<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article
  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.1" specific-use="sps-1.9" xml:lang="en" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
	<front>
		<journal-meta>
			<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">rmfi</journal-id>
			<journal-title-group>
				<journal-title>Revista mexicana de fitopatología</journal-title>
				<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">Rev. mex. fitopatol</abbrev-journal-title>
			</journal-title-group>
			<issn pub-type="ppub">0185-3309</issn>
			<issn pub-type="epub">2007-8080</issn>
			<publisher>
				<publisher-name>Sociedad Mexicana de Fitopatología A.C.</publisher-name>
			</publisher>
		</journal-meta>
		<article-meta>
			<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18781/R. MEX.FIT.2024-14</article-id>
			<article-categories>
				<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
					<subject>Articles</subject>
				</subj-group>
			</article-categories>
			<title-group>
				<article-title>Isolation and characterization of <italic>Exserohilum turcicum</italic>, and its <italic>in vitro</italic> inhibition by volatile organic compounds produced by rhizobacteria</article-title>
			</title-group>
			<contrib-group>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Fonseca-Chávez</surname>
						<given-names>Estefanía</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">¹</xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Molina-Marañón</surname>
						<given-names>Irvin Alonso</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">²</xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Lugo-Zambrano</surname>
						<given-names>Luz Irela</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">³</xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Martínez-Álvarez</surname>
						<given-names>Juan Carlos</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">⁴ </xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Mora-Romero</surname>
						<given-names>Guadalupe Arlene</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">⁵</xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Cordero-Ramírez</surname>
						<given-names>Jesús Damián</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6">⁶ </xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Leyva-Madriga</surname>
						<given-names>Karla Yeriana</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff7">⁷</xref>
				</contrib>
			</contrib-group>
			<aff id="aff1">
				<institution content-type="original">¹ Departamento de Ciencias Naturales y Exactas, Universidad Autónoma de Occidente, Unidad Regional Los Mochis, Blvd. Macario Gaxiola S/N, Col. Conrado Espinoza, C.P. 81223, Los Mochis, Sinaloa, México.</institution>
				<institution content-type="normalized">Universidad Autónoma de Occidente</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Universidad Autónoma de Occidente</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<postal-code>81223</postal-code>
					<city>Los Mochis</city>
					<state>Sinaloa</state>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="MX">Mexico</country>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff2">
				<institution content-type="original">² Departamento de Ciencias Naturales y Exactas, Universidad Autónoma de Occidente, Unidad Regional Los Mochis, Blvd. Macario Gaxiola S/N, Col. Conrado Espinoza, C.P. 81223, Los Mochis, Sinaloa, México.</institution>
				<institution content-type="normalized">Universidad Autónoma de Occidente</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Universidad Autónoma de Occidente</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<postal-code>81223</postal-code>
					<city>Los Mochis</city>
					<state>Sinaloa</state>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="MX">Mexico</country>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff3">
				<institution content-type="original">³ Departamento de Ciencias Naturales y Exactas, Universidad Autónoma de Occidente, Unidad Regional Los Mochis, Blvd. Macario Gaxiola S/N, Col. Conrado Espinoza, C.P. 81223, Los Mochis, Sinaloa, México.</institution>
				<institution content-type="normalized">Universidad Autónoma de Occidente</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Universidad Autónoma de Occidente</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<postal-code>81223</postal-code>
					<city>Los Mochis</city>
					<state>Sinaloa</state>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="MX">Mexico</country>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff4">
				<institution content-type="original">⁴ Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigación para el Desarrollo Integral Regional, Unidad Sinaloa, Departamento de Biotecnología Agrícola, Boulevard Juan de Dios Bátiz Paredes No. 250, Col. San Joachin, Guasave, Sinaloa, C.P. 81101, México.</institution>
				<institution content-type="normalized">Instituto Politécnico Nacional</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Instituto Politécnico Nacional</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<city>Guasave</city>
					<state>Sinaloa</state>
					<postal-code>81101</postal-code>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="MX">Mexico</country>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff5">
				<institution content-type="original">⁵ Unidad de Investigación en Ambiente y Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Occidente, Unidad Regional Los Mochis, Blvd. Macario Gaxiola S/N, Col. Conrado Espinoza, C.P. 81223, Los Mochis, Sinaloa, México.</institution>
				<institution content-type="normalized">Universidad Autónoma de Occidente</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Universidad Autónoma de Occidente</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<postal-code>81223</postal-code>
					<city>Los Mochis</city>
					<state>Sinaloa</state>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="MX">Mexico</country>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff6">
				<institution content-type="original">⁶ Universidad Autónoma de Occidente, Unidad Regional Guasave, Avenida Universidad S/N, C.P. 81048, Guasave, Sinaloa, México.</institution>
				<institution content-type="normalized">Universidad Autónoma de Occidente</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Universidad Autónoma de Occidente</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<postal-code>81048</postal-code>
					<city>Guasave</city>
					<state>Sinaloa</state>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="MX">Mexico</country>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff7">
				<institution content-type="original">⁷ Unidad de Investigación en Ambiente y Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Occidente, Unidad Regional Los Mochis, Blvd. Macario Gaxiola S/N, Col. Conrado Espinoza, C.P. 81223, Los Mochis, Sinaloa, México.</institution>
				<institution content-type="normalized">Universidad Autónoma de Occidente</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Universidad Autónoma de Occidente</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<postal-code>81223</postal-code>
					<city>Los Mochis</city>
					<state>Sinaloa</state>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="MX">Mexico</country>
			</aff>
			<pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic">
				<day>04</day>
				<month>12</month>
				<year>2024</year>
			</pub-date>
			<pub-date date-type="collection" publication-format="electronic">
				<year>2024</year>
			</pub-date>
			<volume>42</volume>
			<issue>4</issue>
			<elocation-id>RMEXFIT202414</elocation-id>
			<history>
				<date date-type="received">
					<day>01</day>
					<month>07</month>
					<year>2024</year>
				</date>
				<date date-type="accepted">
					<day>13</day>
					<month>11</month>
					<year>2024</year>
				</date>
			</history>
			<permissions>
				<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/" xml:lang="en">
					<license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License</license-p>
				</license>
			</permissions>
			<abstract>
				<title>Abstract:</title>
				<sec>
					<title>Background/Objective. </title>
					<p>Biological control offers new strategies for disease management in agriculture. In the present study, the antifungal activity of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted by rhizobacteria, was evaluated in the growth and infective capacity of four isolates of <italic>E. turcicum</italic> obtained from symptomatic corn plants, in northern Sinaloa.</p>
					<p> </p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<title>Materials y methods. </title>
					<p>The fungal isolates were characterized morphologically and molecularly, and their pathogenicity was corroborated in a detached leaf assay. The ability of VOCs to inhibit mycelial growth and infection of maize leaves by</p>
					<p><italic>E. turcicum</italic> was evaluated in <italic>in vitro</italic> assays, in divided Petri dishes. Bacterial hydrogen cyanide production was qualitatively determined.</p>
					<p> </p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<title>Results. </title>
					<p>The mycelial growth of <italic>E. turcicum</italic> was reduced by VOCs of at least one rhizobacteria, registering inhibitions between 22% and 63%. Leaves infection was reduced between 63% and 98% in the presence of rhizobacterial VOCs. Hydrogen cyanide production was detected in strains B3 and B9.</p>
					<p> </p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<title>Conclusion. </title>
					<p>Strain B95 was more effective in reducing mycelial growth and infection by <italic>E. turcicum.</italic> The production of hydrogen cyanide could be involved in its antagonistic effect. In-plant tests are required to corroborate its effectiveness, as well as characterize its volatile profile.</p>
				</sec>
			</abstract>
			<kwd-group xml:lang="en">
				<title>Keywords:</title>
				<kwd>Biocontrol</kwd>
				<kwd>Bacillus</kwd>
				<kwd>Pseudomonas</kwd>
				<kwd>leaf blight</kwd>
				<kwd>volatile compounds<italic>.</italic></kwd>
			</kwd-group>
			<counts>
				<fig-count count="10"/>
				<table-count count="4"/>
				<equation-count count="0"/>
				<ref-count count="27"/>
				<page-count count="0"/>
			</counts>
		</article-meta>
	</front>
	<body>
		<sec sec-type="intro">
			<title>Introduction</title>
			<p>Maize leaf blight, caused by <italic>Exserohilum turcicum,</italic> is one of the most important leaf diseases in the world. The development of the disease is favored by high relative humidity (&gt; 90%) and a mean daily temperature of 18-26 °C. Typical symptoms are long lesions (2.5 and 15 cm in length), elliptical, and grayish green in color. As the disease spreads, lesions become tan with dark areas and coalesce to form the blight. The reduction of the photosynthetic area may reach up to 65%, leading to losses between 15 and 75% in yield (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Félix-Gastélum <italic>et al.,</italic> 2018</xref>).</p>
			<p>The current management of maize blight implies the use of synthetic fungicides of the dithiocarbamate, nitrile, triazole and strobilurin chemical groups (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">De Rossi <italic>et al.,</italic> 2020</xref>). However, the ordinary use of synthetic fungicides increases the selection pressure on the population of the pathogen, leading to the development of resistance to fungicides and inconsistencies in chemical control (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Wise and Mueller, 2011</xref>).</p>
			<p>In recent years, bioprotection has arisen as an alternative to the chemical control of multiple plant diseases. Some rhizobacteria have a great potential for the suppression of phytopathogens, due to their capacity to produce a wide range of lytic enzymes and diffusible and volatile antimicrobial compounds, that limit the growth and infection of phytopathogens, as well as stimulating the growth of plants with the production and modulation of phytohormones (Sartori <italic>et al.,</italic> 2015, 2017; Sehrawat <italic>et al.,</italic> 2022).</p>
			<p>Volatile organic compounds (VOC) are secondary metabolites of low molecular weights and low polarity, making them easily diffusible in the soil and the atmo- sphere (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Zhao <italic>et al</italic>., 2023</xref>). Several VOCs emitted by rhizobacteria are able to inhib- it the growth of phytopathogenic fungi, hence their potential to be used to control diseases <italic>in planta</italic> and post-harvest (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Poulaki and Tjamos, 2023</xref>; Zhao <italic>et al</italic>., 2023). This antifungal effect is attributed to the alteration of the cell wall integrity, the cell membrane fluidity, the disruption of the redox balance, and even to the alteration of the transcriptome of the pathogen, reducing the expression of the virulence and energetic metabolism genes.</p>
			<p>Some of the main VOCs-producing rhizobacteria genera with antifungal ac- tivity include <italic>Bacillus</italic>, <italic>Pseudomonas</italic>, <italic>Paenibacillus</italic>, <italic>Brevibacillus</italic> and <italic>Ralstonia</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Zhao <italic>et al</italic>., 2023</xref>). Alongside its antifungal activity, some bacterial VOCs promote growth and induce systemic resistance in plants, which allows them to defend fast- er and more effectively against pathogens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Poulaki and Tjamos, 2023</xref>).</p>
			<p>Hydrocyanic acid, or hydrogen cyanide (HCN), is a VOC with antimicrobial activity that joins cytochrome c oxidase and interferes with cell respiration (Anand <italic>et al</italic>., 2023). Some rhizobacteria such as <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> use this molecule as one of its main mechanisms to fight pathogens in plants (Anand <italic>et al</italic>., 2020).</p>
			<p>Due to this, the aims of this study were to: 1) obtain and characterize maize <italic>Exserohilum turcicum</italic> isolates; 2) evaluate the effect of the VOCs produced by rhizobacteria on mycelial growth and the <italic>in vitro</italic> infection of <italic>E. turcicum</italic>; and 3) determine the production of hydrocyanic acid or hydrogen cyanide (HCN), an im- portant VOC with antifungal effect, produced by rhizobacteria.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="materials|methods">
			<title>Materials and Methods</title>
			<p><bold>Obtaining and purifying fungal isolates<italic>.</italic> 
</bold> In February and March, 2020, maize leaves with typical symptoms of leaf blight were gathered from the municipal areas of Ahome, El Fuerte and Guasave, in Sinaloa, Mexico. The leaves were cut into small pieces (25 mm<sup>2</sup>) from the edge of the lesion, disinfested for 3 min in a 0.5% sodium hypochlorite solution and washed three times with sterile distilled water. The pieces of disinfested tissue were placed in Petri dishes with Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA; MCD LAB, Tlalnepantla, State of Mexico), supplemented with neomycin (0.1125 mg/mL) and streptomycin sulphate (0.5 mg/mL), and incubated at 25 °C for 3 days. The fungal cultures were transferred to dishes with PDA and incubated at 25 °C for 14 days. Monosporic cultures were obtained and stored in filter paper at 4 °C (Hiruma and Saijo, 2016).</p>
			<p>Morphological characterization of fungal isolates. In order to evaluate the morphological characteristics of the isolates, they were cultivated on PDA and V8- agar and incubated at 25 °C for 10 and 15 días, respectively. The mycelial growth rate and the macroscopic characteristics of the cultures (texture, type of edge and pigmentation of front and back) were evaluated on PDA. The shape, number of septa, length and width of 30 conidia of each isolate, cultivated on V8, was evaluated under an Axio Imager M2 microscope (Carl Zeiss).</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<title>Molecular identification of fungal isolates</title>
			<p>DNA extraction, PCR and sequencing. The genomic DNA was extracted from 50 mg of fresh mycelia, of PDA cultures grown for 10 days, using the YeaStarTM Genomic DNA kit (N. cat D2002, Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA), following the manufacturer’s protocol. The amplification of the ITS region, the actin (<italic>act</italic>) and the second largest subunit of the polymerase RNA II (<italic>rpb2</italic>) genes, was carried out using the primers ITS1/ ITS4 (White <italic>et al.,</italic> 1990), Ex-actF/Ex-actR (5’ - CCCCGAGCAGTCTTCCGTA - 3’/5’ - GTACGTCCAGAGGCGTACAG - 3’; 480 pb) y Ex-rpb2F/Ex-rpb2R (5’ - CTTCGTCGAACAAAYACWCCTG - 3’/5’ - CRCAGTGRGTRTAGGCATGG - 3’; 760 pb), respectively. The primers for <italic>act</italic> and <italic>rpb2</italic> were designed for this study, using the program Primer3 (Untergasser <italic>et al</italic>., 2012). The PCR was carried out in an Apollo ATC-201 thermocycler (Nyx Technik, San Diego, CA, USA) with 1 ng of DNA, 1.5 mM of MgCl<sub>2</sub>, 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 0.5 mM of each primer and 1 U of polymerase DNA (Invitrogen, Brazil, Cat. Nº 11615-050) in a final volume of 25 mL. The PCR program consisted of 5 min of initial denaturation at 94 °C, followed by 35 denaturation cycles at 95°C for 40 s, annealing at 55 °C for ITS and 60 °C for <italic>act</italic> and <italic>rpb2</italic> for 40 s, a 1 min extension at 72 °C and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. The PCR products were sequenced at Macrogen Inc. (Seoul, South Korea).</p>
			<p>Multigene phylogenetic analysis. The sequences were edited in BioEdit v 7.0.5.3 (Hall, 1999) and compared in the NCBI data base using the BLASTn algorithm. A concatenated alignment <italic>act+ITS+rpb2</italic> was generated with MUSCLE (Edgar, 2004), implemented in MEGA X (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Kumar <italic>et al.,</italic> 2018</xref>). The partition scheme was evaluated in PartitionFinder v 1.1.1 (Lanfear <italic>et al.,</italic> 2012), based on Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC). Phylogenetic reconstruction was performed with the Maximum Likelihood (ML) method in RAXML v 7.2.8 (Stamatakis, 2006), using the model GTRGAMMAI and 1000 bootstrap replicates. The phylogram was edited using iTOL (Letunic and Bork, 2021; https://itol.embl.de/).</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<title>Pathogenicity test</title>
			<p>Detached leaf assay. The pathogenicity of four <italic>E. turcicum</italic> isolates was evaluated following the methodology by Perochon and Doohan (2016), with modifications. Leaf fragments of 6 cm in length, were taken from the second true leaf of 20- day old maize plants, grown under controlled conditions in the laboratory. The leaf fragments were disinfested superficially with a 0.75% sodium hypochlorite solution for 1 min, followed by four washes with sterile distilled water. After being disinfected, they were placed in squared Petri dishes (100 mm × 100 mm), adaxial side up. The tips of the leaves were placed between two layers of water agar supplemented with 50 μg/mL of 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP; Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany), as in a “sandwich” (Aregbesola <italic>et al.,</italic> 2020).</p>
			<p>The leaves were inoculated with three 5-mL drops (~ 120 conidia) of a conidial suspension at 2.4 × 10<sup>4</sup> conidia/mL, obtained from a 15-day old culture on V8 agar. Leaves inoculated with a sterile 1% Tween 80 solution were used as a control. The plates were incubated at 25 °C, with a 12 h light/12 h dark photoperiod for 6 days in a completely randomized design, with three repetitions per treatment. The assay was carried out twice.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<title><bold>Antifungal effect of the bacterial VOCs on <italic>E. turcicum</italic>
</bold></title>
			<p>Bacterial strains. The antagonistic effect of six rhizobacteria, previously isolated and characterized by Morales-Ruíz (2022), was evaluated. Strains B2 (<italic>Staphylococcus warneri</italic>), B3 (<italic>Bacillus aryabhattai</italic>), B9 (<italic>Staphylococcus saccharolyticus</italic>), B11 (<italic>Acinetobacter radioresistens</italic>) and B15 (<italic>Bacillus velezensis</italic>) were isolated from the rhizosphere of <italic>Arundo donax</italic> (carrizo), and strain B95 (<italic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic>) was taken from the rhizosphere of maize.</p>
			<p>Divided Petri dish assay. The assay of antagonism by VOC was carried out in Petri dishes with two divisions (90 mm in diameter), containing Nutrient Agar (NA) and PDA, respectively. The bacterial strains were streak-inoculated on the NA side of the dish and incubated at 25 °C for 12 h. A PDA disk with mycelial growth of the fungal isolate (5 mm in diameter) was then inoculated in the side of the Petri dish containing PDA. Immediately afterwards, the dishes were sealed and incubated at 25 °C for 10 days, in a completely randomized arrangement, with 5 repetitions for each bacteria/fungus combination. Petri dishes with PDA inoculated with the fungal isolate in the absence of bacteria were used as controls. The diameter of the fungal cultures was measured and the percentage of inhibition was calculated using the formula proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Vincent (1947</xref>). The assay was carried out twice, independently, in different times.</p>
			<p>Detached leaf assay. The bacteria that displayed inhibition percentages ≥40%, with at least two <italic>E. turcicum</italic> isolates in the divided dish assay, were selected to evaluate their effect in the reduction of maize leaves infection by four <italic>E. turcicum</italic> isolates. The assay was performed in divided Petri dishes (100 mm × 15 mm); on one side, the maize leaf was placed and inoculated with a suspension of fungal conidia, following the methodology previously described for the pathogenicity test. A 35 mm diameter Petri dish, containing AN medium with the bacterial strain streak-inoculated, was placed on the other side of the plate. Pathogenicity controls with no bacteria inoculated on the 35 mm Petri dish containing sterile AN medium, were used for each fungal isolate. Additionally, non-inoculated leaves, exposed to bacterial VOCs were used as bacterial controls to rule out a possible phytotoxic effect of the bacterial VOCs on the maize leaf, which could interfere with the estimation of the damage caused by the fungus. The plates were tightly sealed to prevent VOC leakage. Four replicates were performed per treatment. The plates were distributed in a completely randomized design and incubated at 25 ºC, with a photoperiod of 16 h light/ 8 h darkness, for six days. The percentage of leaf area affected (%LAA) was estimated using the Image J software, version 1.8.0 (Schindelin <italic>et al.,</italic> 2012). The assay was carried out twice, independently and at different times.</p>
			<p>Hydrocyanic acid (HCN) production test. The production of HCN in four bacterial strains was evaluated following the methodology reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Anand <italic>et al.</italic> (2020</xref>). Filter paper squares (1 cm<sup>2</sup>) were dipped in the Feigl and Anger reagent, which consists of 10 mL of chloroform (CTR Scientific, Mexico City, Mexico), 50 mg of copper ethyl acetoacetate (II) (Thermo scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) and 50 mg of 4,4-methylene bis (N, N-dimethylaniline) (Sigma Aldrich, San Luis, Missouri, USA), until saturation. The filter paper was removed from the reagent and left to dry all night at room temperature (25 °C). The bacteria were streaked on AN medium in Petri dishes (60 mm in diameter), the filter paper was placed on the inner side of the Petri dish lid. Three replicates were performed per treatment. The plates were sealed and incubated at 25 °C for 48 h. Strains were considered positive for HCN production if the filter paper turned blue.</p>
			<p>Statistical analysis. The statistical analyses were carried out in R Studio version 1.4.1106 (RStudio Team 2020), using the “<italic>agricolae</italic>” package (de Mendiburu, 2020). The diameter of the fungal culture and the %LAA were analyzed with an analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s post hoc means separation test (a = 0.05). The %LAA was transformed with the arcsine formula before the statistical analysis. The normality of the residuals was corroborated using the Shapiro Wilks test and with a Normal QQ plot.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="results">
			<title>Results</title>
			<p>Morphological characterization of fungal isolates. Four monosporic isolates were obtained, with morphological characteristics that varied slightly (Table S1, S2). Growth rates fluctuated between 7.56 and 19.89 mm/day. The cultures were cottony, olive-green color in the front, and fimbriate margin (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">Figure 1</xref>A). On the opposite side, they were olivaceous black in color, with white- or cream-colored edges (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">Figure 1</xref>B). The conidia of the four isolates were tapered, slightly curved to straight, elongated, olive colored, with a prominent hilum (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">Figure 1</xref>C), a length of 54.49 to 124.34 µm (91.77 µm ± 16.75), a width of 11.81 to 29.86 µm (21.01 µm ± 3.24), and an average of six septa (Table S2).</p>
			<p>Molecular identification of fungal isolates. The sequences comparison of the <italic>act</italic> and <italic>rpb2</italic> genes, as well as the ITS region, displayed percentages identity of 96.63 </p>
			<p>
				<fig id="f1">
					<label>Figure 1</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Characterization of <italic>Exserohilum turcicum</italic> isolates. <bold>A-C)</bold> Morphological characteristics of representative isolate Bac7-2. <bold>A)</bold> Frontal view of the culture in PDA; <bold>B)</bold> Reverse view of the culture in PDA; <bold>C)</bold> Conidium; <bold>D)</bold> Maximum Likelihood phylogram inferred from the combined matrix of the markers <italic>act</italic>+ITS+<italic>rpb2</italic> from <italic>Exserohilum</italic>.</title>
					</caption>
					<graphic xlink:href="2007-8080-rmfi-42-04-RMEXFIT202414-gf1.gif"/>
				</fig>
			</p>
			<p>to 100% with the species <italic>Exserohilum turcicum</italic>. The sequences of the isolates were deposited in the GenBank data base and the accession numbers are shown in Table S1.</p>
			<p>
				<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">Figure 1</xref>D shows the phylogram inferred from the concatenated alignment <italic>act</italic>+ITS+<italic>rpb</italic>2, where isolates Bac7-2, Por14-1, Moc2-1 and Moc2-11 are shown to belong to <italic>Exserohilum turcicum,</italic> since they group into the same clade as the <italic>E. turcicum</italic> CBS 330.64 type isolate (bootstrap of 100%).</p>
			<p>Pathogenicty tests. The four <italic>E. turcicum</italic> isolates produced typical lesions on the leaves, in the detached leaf assay (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">Figure 2</xref>). The first lesions, such as chlorotic spots in the inoculated area, were observed four days after the inoculation and progressed to necrotic lesions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">Figure 2</xref>). The leaves of the control treatment remained free of lesions during the assay (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">Figure 2</xref>A).</p>
			<p>
				<fig id="f2">
					<label>Figure 2</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Pathogenicity test. <bold>A)</bold> Detached leaf system used to confirm the pathogenicity; <bold>B)</bold> Symptoms caused by the <italic>Exserohilum turcicum</italic> isolates in the detached maize leaves.</title>
					</caption>
					<graphic xlink:href="2007-8080-rmfi-42-04-RMEXFIT202414-gf2.gif"/>
				</fig>
			</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<title><bold>Antifungal effect of the bacterial VOCs on <italic>E. turcicum</italic>
</bold></title>
			<p>Divided Petri dish assay. The mycelial growth of the <italic>E. turcicum</italic> isolates, except for isolate Moc2-11, was reduced by the VOCs of at least one rhizobacteria (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">Figure 3</xref>; <xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>). The VOCs of strains B3 and B95 inhibited fungal isolates in a greater proportion. Strains B9 and B15 only inhibited the growth of isolates Bac7-2 and Moc2-1, and favored the growth of isolate Por14-1. Strain B15 showed greater inhibition of the isolate Bac7-2 (63.29%). Strains B2 and B11 only reduced the growth of isolate Bac7-2 and favored the growth of isolate Por14-1 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>).</p>
			<p><bold>Detached leaf assay<italic>.</italic> 
</bold> Based on the results of the divided plate assay, strains B3, B9, B15 and B95 were chosen to evaluate the protective effect of their VOCs against infections caused by the <italic>E. turcicum</italic> isolates on detached maize leaves. The %LAA exposed to the bacterial VOCs was statistically lower (p &lt; 0.05) to the one recorded</p>
			<p>
				<fig id="f3">
					<label>Figure 3</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Effect of the bacterial volatile organic compounds on the mycelial growth of <italic>Exserohilum turcicum</italic> in divided Petri dishes.</title>
					</caption>
					<graphic xlink:href="2007-8080-rmfi-42-04-RMEXFIT202414-gf3.jpg"/>
				</fig>
			</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t1">
					<label>Table 1</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Effect of the bacterial volatile organic compounds (VOCs) on the mycelial growth of <italic>Exserohilum turcicum</italic> in divided plates.</title>
					</caption>
					<table border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" style="border-collapse: collapse; width: 100%; text-align: center;">
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th rowspan="2">Strain</th>
								<th colspan="2">Bac7-2</th>
								<th colspan="2">Moc2-1</th>
								<th colspan="2">Moc2-11</th>
								<th colspan="2">Por14-1</th>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<th>Colony diameter</th>
								<th>%MGI</th>
								<th>Colony diameter</th>
								<th>%MGI</th>
								<th>Colony diameter</th>
								<th>%MGI</th>
								<th>Colony diameter</th>
								<th>%MGI</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td style="font-weight:bold">B2</td>
								<td>35.21<sup>*,b</sup></td>
								<td>26.13 ± 9.41</td>
								<td>52.95<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td>-</td>
								<td>32.38<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td>-</td>
								<td>49.48<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td>-</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td style="font-weight:bold">B3</td>
								<td>20.86<sup>cd</sup></td>
								<td>56.22 ± 3.08</td>
								<td>31.35<sup>bc</sup></td>
								<td>37.52 ± 8.38</td>
								<td>15.08<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td>39.48 ± 13.81</td>
								<td>19.56<sup>c</sup></td>
								<td>33.83 ± 5.40</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td style="font-weight:bold">B9</td>
								<td>19.91<sup>cd</sup></td>
								<td>58.22 ± 2.19</td>
								<td>25.10<sup>c</sup></td>
								<td>49.99 ± 2.08</td>
								<td>18.02<sup>ab</sup></td>
								<td>27.68 ± 7.70</td>
								<td>48.75<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td>-</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td style="font-weight:bold">B11</td>
								<td>37.14<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td>22.09 ± 3.33</td>
								<td>42.40<sup>ab</sup></td>
								<td>15.52 ± 10.47</td>
								<td>25.42<sup>ab</sup></td>
								<td>-</td>
								<td>47.39<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td>-</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td style="font-weight:bold">B15</td>
								<td>17.50<sup>d</sup></td>
								<td>63.29 ± 1.46</td>
								<td>23.96<sup>c</sup></td>
								<td>52.26 ± 2.19</td>
								<td>21.66<sup>ab</sup></td>
								<td>13.10 ± 4.84</td>
								<td>52.04<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td>-</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td style="font-weight:bold">B95</td>
								<td>28.14<sup>bc</sup></td>
								<td>40.96 ± 5.70</td>
								<td>23.25<sup>c</sup></td>
								<td>53.67 ± 2.34</td>
								<td>15.87<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td>36.33 ± 3.63</td>
								<td>19.12<sup>c</sup></td>
								<td>35.32 ± 8.74</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td style="font-weight:bold">CTRL</td>
								<td>47.67<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td>-</td>
								<td>50.19<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td>-</td>
								<td>24.92<sup>ab</sup></td>
								<td>-</td>
								<td>29.57<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td>-</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN1">
							<label><sup>*</sup></label>
							<p> Means are shown.</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN2">
							<p>%MGI Percentage of mycelial growth inhibition.</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN3">
							<p>- Indicates no inhibition.</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN4">
							<p>Data followed by different letters in the same column are statistically different, according to Tukey’s test (p &lt; 0.05).</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>in the leaves of the control group (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">Figure 4</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>). The lowest %LAA values were recorded in the treatments with the B95 strain, with reductions of the infection that ranged between 95.58 and 98.63% in the leaves infected with isolates Por14-1 and Moc2-1, respectively. The VOCs of strain B15 reduced the infection (&gt;80%) in the maize leaves after being inoculated with the fungal isolates. No phytotoxic effects by the bacterial VOCs were observed in the maize leaves (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">Figure 4</xref>).</p>
			<p>Production of hydrocyanic acid (HCN). HCN production was found in strains B3 and B95. After 24 h of incubation of the rhizobacteria, a color change was observed (from white to blue) in the filter paper on the culture of the B95 strain, which intensified after 48 h of incubation. In strain B3, a slight blue color was observed in the filter paper after 48 h. The intensity of the blue color in strain B95 suggests that it produces a higher concentration of this VOC than strain B3 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">Figure 5</xref>).</p>
			<p>
				<fig id="f4">
					<label>Figure 4</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Effect of the bacterial volatile organic compounds on the infective capacity of <italic>Exserohilum turcicum</italic> on detached maize leaves.</title>
					</caption>
					<graphic xlink:href="2007-8080-rmfi-42-04-RMEXFIT202414-gf4.jpg"/>
				</fig>
			</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t2">
					<label>Table 2</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Effect of the bacterial volatile organic compounds (VOCs), in the infective capacity of <italic>Exserohilum turcicum</italic> in detached maize leaves.</title>
					</caption>
					<table border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" style="border-collapse: collapse; width: 100%; text-align: center;">
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th rowspan="2">Strain</th>
								<th colspan="2">Bac7-2</th>
								<th colspan="2">Moc2-1</th>
								<th colspan="2">Moc2-11</th>
								<th colspan="2">Por14-1</th>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<th>%LAA</th>
								<th>%RI</th>
								<th>%LAA</th>
								<th>%RI</th>
								<th>%LAA</th>
								<th>%RI</th>
								<th>%LAA</th>
								<th>%RI</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td style="font-weight:bold">B3</td>
								<td>4.23<sup>*,c</sup></td>
								<td>92.82 ± 1.92</td>
								<td>8.93<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td>84.17 ± 4.79</td>
								<td>4.47<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td>89.98 ± 4.74</td>
								<td>16.63<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td>63.74 ± 12.08</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td style="font-weight:bold">B9</td>
								<td>18.41<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td>68.82 ± 7.24</td>
								<td>4.44<sup>bc</sup></td>
								<td>92.12 ± 2.80</td>
								<td>5.48<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td>87.71 ± 3.98</td>
								<td>11.47<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td>74.97 ± 7.59</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td style="font-weight:bold">B15</td>
								<td>7.12<sup>bc</sup></td>
								<td>87.92 ± 4.22</td>
								<td>7.59<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td>86.55 ± 4.17</td>
								<td>8.48<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td>80.98 ± 4.88</td>
								<td>4.85<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td>89.40 ± 5.26</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td style="font-weight:bold">B95</td>
								<td>1.54<sup>c</sup></td>
								<td>97.37 ± 1.32</td>
								<td>0.76<sup>c</sup></td>
								<td>98.63 ± 0.28</td>
								<td>1.23<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td>97.24 ± 1.04</td>
								<td>2.02<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td>95.58 ± 1.85</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td style="font-weight:bold">CTRL</td>
								<td>59.06<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td>-</td>
								<td>56.48<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td>-</td>
								<td>44.65<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td>-</td>
								<td>45.87<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td>-</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN5">
							<p>%LAA Percentage of leaf area affected.</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN6">
							<p>%RI Percentage reduction of the infection.</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN7">
							<label><sup>*</sup></label>
							<p> Means are shown.</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN8">
							<p>Data followed by different letters in the same column are statistically different, according to Tukey’s test (p &lt; 0.05).</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>
				<fig id="f5">
					<label>Figure 5</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Detection of volatile hydrocyanic acid emitted by rhizobacteria.</title>
					</caption>
					<graphic xlink:href="2007-8080-rmfi-42-04-RMEXFIT202414-gf5.jpg"/>
				</fig>
			</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="discussion">
			<title>Discussion</title>
			<p>The morphometric and microscopic characteristics of fungal isolates were similar to those reported for other <italic>E. turcicum</italic> isolates in the region (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Félix-Gastélum <italic>et al</italic>., 2018</xref>) and worldwide (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Hernández-Rastrepo <italic>et al</italic>., 2018</xref>). The phylogenetic multigene analysis verified the identity of the four pathogenic fungal isolates.</p>
			<p>The observed variation of the diseased severity induced by the isolates, has been reported in other studies and it has been attributed to the high genetic diversity in the populations of this fungal species, along with the susceptibility of the maize varieties and/or the combination of both (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ahangar <italic>et al</italic>., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Nieuwoudt <italic>et al</italic>., 2018</xref>; Cui <italic>et al</italic>., 2022; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Bankole <italic>et al</italic>., 2023</xref>).</p>
			<p>Strains of bacterial genera such as <italic>Pseudomonas</italic>, <italic>Bacillus</italic>, <italic>Pantoea</italic>, <italic>Paenibacillus</italic> and <italic>Sinomonas</italic> have been proven to inhibit the mycelial growth of <italic>E. turcicum</italic> by producing diffusible compounds and hydrolytic enzymes (Sartori <italic>et al</italic>., 2020; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Chen <italic>et al.,</italic> 2022</xref>). However, the effect of the bacterial VOCs on this phytopathogen has been scarcely explored.</p>
			<p>This study shows the capacity of VOCs of bacterial strains (B3, B9, B15 and B95), to inhibit the mycelial growth of <italic>E. turcicum</italic> and protect maize leaves against the attack of this fungus by reducing the leaf area affected. The antifungal activity of these bacterial strains was previously evaluated against <italic>Rhizoctonia zeae</italic> and recorded inhibitions of the mycelial growth between 40% and 50% via diffusible compounds (Morales-Ruiz <italic>et al</italic>., 2022). The same authors reported that strain B95 was inefficient in the inhibition of <italic>R. zeae</italic>, which contrasts with the results of this study, since this strain displayed high inhibition values by VOCs and diffusible compounds (Data not shown), against all <italic>E. turcicum</italic> isolates. In addition, the VOCs of strain B95 reduced the %LAA in maize leaves inoculated with the fungal isolates by more than 90%.</p>
			<p>Sartori <italic>et al</italic>. (2020) reported mycelial growth inhibition of <italic>E. turcicum</italic> by VOCs emitted by <italic>Curtobacterium</italic>, <italic>Pantoea</italic> and <italic>Bacillus</italic> strains, the latter genus displaying the greatest fungal inhibition. Among the VOCs produced by these bacteria we can mention <italic>2-</italic>Nonadecanone, indole, D-limonene, 2-Tridecanone and dimethyl trisulfide, whose fungal antifungal activity has already been shown (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Wu <italic>et al</italic>., 2019</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Gao <italic>et al</italic>. (2017</xref>) reported inhibitions between 83 and 91% of <italic>Alternaria alternata</italic> and <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic>, respectively, using VOCs from <italic>B. velezensis,</italic> ZSY-1 strain. This antifungal effect was attributed to the VOCs pyrazine, benzothiazole, phenol and 1,1-dimethylethyl<italic>.</italic> The mycelial growth inhibition of the <italic>E. turcicum</italic> isolates by <italic>B. velezensis</italic> strain B15 VOCs, is similar to the values reported by Gao <italic>et al.</italic> (2017).</p>
			<p><italic>Pseudomonas</italic> species such as <italic>P. aureaginosa</italic> and <italic>P. fluorescens</italic> produce VOCs such as <italic>2,</italic>5<italic>-</italic>Dimethyl<italic>-</italic>3(2H)-furanone, silanediol, 2,4,4<italic>-</italic>Trimethyl<italic>-</italic>1<italic>-</italic>pentene<italic>,</italic> HCN, dimethyl disulfide (DMDS), dimethyl trisulfide (DMTS), with proven anti- fungal activity against <italic>Botryosphaeria rhodina</italic>, <italic>R. solani</italic>, <italic>Pythium aphaniderma- tum</italic>, <italic>Penicillium italicum,</italic> and others (Michelsen and Stougaard, 2012; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Wang <italic>et al.,</italic> 2020</xref>: Morales <italic>et al</italic>., 2023)<italic>.</italic> The variations regarding the percentages of inhibition (4 and 80%) reported by these authors for <italic>P. aureaginosa</italic> and <italic>P. fluorescens</italic> were attributed to the bacterial (antagonist) and fungal strains (pathogen). The inhibition values of <italic>E. turcicum</italic> isolates by <italic>P. aureaginosa</italic> B95 were high, especially against isolate Moc2-1, which was inhibited by 98%. This value is greater to those docu- mented by the authors mentioned above.</p>
			<p>The use of members of the <italic>Staphyloccocus</italic> genus as a biological control agent is not frequent. However, some species that produce VOCs with antifungal ac- tivity have been identified. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Alijani <italic>et al.</italic> (2019</xref>) documented a 34.52% mycelial growth inhibition and 82.81% inhibition in the conidia germination of <italic>Colletotri- chum nymphaeae,</italic> due to the effect of the VOCs emitted by <italic>Staphylococcus sciuri</italic>. Mesityl oxide, acetic acid, toluene, o-xylene, 4-methtldecane and 2-methylpropyl ester were the most commonly produced VOCs by S. <italic>sciuri</italic>, all with verified anti- microbial activity (Nakkeeran <italic>et al.</italic> 2020).</p>
			<p>The inhibition values of the B2 (<italic>S. warneri</italic>) and B9 (<italic>S. saccharolyticus</italic>) strains in this study are different to those reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Alijani <italic>et al</italic>. (2019</xref>). Strain B9 in- hibited isolates Bac7-2 and Moc2-1 to greater extents, whereas strain B2 only in- hibited isolate Bac7-2 by 26.13%. The reduced %LAA observed in maize leaves inoculated with the <italic>E. turcicum</italic> isolates and then exposed to the VOCs of strain B9, may be due to an inhibition of the conidial germination of the <italic>E. turcicum</italic> isolates, since these were used as inoculants to infect the maize leaves.</p>
			<p>HCN is a VOC with an antifungal effect, which interferes with cell respiration by inhibiting the cytochrome c oxidase. It is produces by rhizobacteria, especially by <italic>Pseudomonas</italic>, although cyanogenic strains of <italic>Aeromonas</italic>, <italic>Chromobacterium</italic>, <italic>Burkholderia</italic> and <italic>Bacillus</italic> have also been reported (Sehrawat <italic>et al.,</italic> 2022)<italic>.</italic> Antifungal species <italic>P. aeruginosa, P. fluorescens</italic>, <italic>P. chlororaphis, P. putida</italic>, <italic>B. cereus</italic>, <italic>B. subtilis</italic>, <italic>B. paramycoides</italic> and <italic>B. aryabhattai</italic> have been reported as HCN producers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Anand <italic>et al</italic>., 2020</xref>; Shastri <italic>et al</italic>., 2020; Sehrawat <italic>et al.,</italic> 2022; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Riera <italic>et al</italic>., 2023</xref>). Based on the ability of strains B95 and B3 to produce HCN, it could be suggested that their antagonistic effect can be attributed to this VOC, especially in strain B95. However, it is possible that other VOCs are involved. On the other hand, the antifungal effect of strains B9 and B15 is caused by VOCs other than HCN, such as those reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Alijani <italic>et al</italic>. (2019</xref>) for <italic>Staphyloccocus</italic> (mesityl oxide, acetic acid, toluene, o-xylene, 4-methyldecane, 2-methylpropyl ester), or those reported by Sartori <italic>et al</italic>. (2020) for <italic>Bacillus</italic> (<italic>2-</italic>Nonadecanone, indole, D-limonene, 2-Tridecanone and dimethyl trisulfide). However, the involvement of non-previously reported VOCs cannot be ruled out.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="conclusions">
			<title>Conclusions</title>
			<p>The fungal isolates recovered from maize leaves with leaf blight symptoms were identified as <italic>E. turcicum</italic>, and their pathogenicity was verified. The mycelial growth and infective ability of <italic>E. turcicum</italic> were affected by the VOCs emitted by the evaluated rhizobacteria. Strains B3 (<italic>Bacillus aryabhattai</italic>), B15 (<italic>Bacillus velezensis</italic>) and B95 (<italic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic>) were the most efficient in the mycelial growth inhibition of the fungal isolates and in the reduction of the %LAA. Strain B95 has a higher potential as a biocontrol agent against <italic>E. turcicum,</italic> and its further study is needed to verify its effectiveness <italic>in planta</italic>. The HCN produced by strains B3 and B95 may be involved in the antifungal effect on <italic>E. turcicum</italic>. Strains B9 and B15 produced no HCN, suggesting that the antagonism against <italic>E. turcicum</italic> may be due to other antifungal VOCs. It is necessary to study the volatile profile of the four bacterial strains and their individual and collective (mixed) effects on <italic>E. turcicum,</italic> in order to explore a possible synergic effect between VOCs and between bacterial strains.</p>
		</sec>
	</body>
	<back>
		<ack>
			<title>Acknowledgments</title>
			<p> </p>
			<p> </p>
			<p>The authors wish to thank the Dirección General de Educación Superior Universitaria e Intercultural (<italic>DGESUI</italic>) for funding this project through the call for Support for the Incorporation of NPTC (Project UDO-PTC-071). IAMM acknowledges the Consejo Nacional de Humanidades Ciencias y Tecnologías (CONAHCYT) master’s scholarship granted la beca de maestría otorgada. All authors thank Dr. Ignacio Maldonado Mendoza and Dr. Damián Cordero Ramírez for kindly providing the bacterial strains evaluated in this study<bold>.</bold></p>
		</ack>
		<ref-list>
			<title>Literatura citada</title>
			<ref id="B1">
				<mixed-citation> Ahangar, MA Bhat, ZA Sheikh, F Dar, ZA Lone, AA Hooda, KS Reyaz, MA (2016). Pathogenic variability in<italic>Exserohilum turcicum</italic>and identification of resistant sources to<italic>turcicum</italic>leaf blight of maize (<italic>Zea mays</italic>L.). Journal of Applied and Natural Science 8:1523-1529. 10.31018/jans.v8i3.994. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Ahangar</surname>
							<given-names>MA</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bhat</surname>
							<given-names>ZA</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sheikh</surname>
							<given-names>F</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Dar</surname>
							<given-names>ZA</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lone</surname>
							<given-names>AA</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hooda</surname>
							<given-names>KS</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Reyaz</surname>
							<given-names>MA</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2016</year>
					<article-title>Pathogenic variability in Exserohilum turcicum and identification of resistant sources to turcicum leaf blight of maize (Zea mays L.)</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Applied and Natural Science</source>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31018/jans.v8i3.994</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B2">
				<mixed-citation> Alijani, Z Amini, J Ashengroph, M Bahramnejad, B (2019). Antifungal activity of volatile compounds produced by<italic>Staphylococcus sciuri</italic>strain MarR44 and its potential for the biocontrol of<italic>Colletotrichum nymphaeae</italic>, causal agent strawberry anthracnose. International Journal of Food Microbiology 307:108276. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2019.108276. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Alijani</surname>
							<given-names>Z</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Amini</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ashengroph</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bahramnejad</surname>
							<given-names>B</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2019</year>
					<article-title>Antifungal activity of volatile compounds produced by Staphylococcus sciuri strain MarR44 and its potential for the biocontrol of Colletotrichum nymphaeae, causal agent strawberry anthracnose</article-title>
					<source>International Journal of Food Microbiology</source>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2019.108276</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B3">
				<mixed-citation> Anand, A Chinchilla, D Tan, C Mène-Saffrané, L L’Haridon, F Weisskopf, L (2020). Contribution of hydrogen cyanide to the antagonistic activity of<italic>Pseudomonas</italic>strains against<italic>Phytophthora infestans</italic>. Microorganisms 28(8):1144. 10.3390/microorganisms8081144. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Anand</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Chinchilla</surname>
							<given-names>D</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Tan</surname>
							<given-names>C</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mène-Saffrané</surname>
							<given-names>L</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>L’Haridon</surname>
							<given-names>F</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Weisskopf</surname>
							<given-names>L</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2020</year>
					<article-title>Contribution of hydrogen cyanide to the antagonistic activity of Pseudomonas strains against Phytophthora infestans</article-title>
					<source>Microorganisms</source>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/microorganisms8081144</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B4">
				<mixed-citation> Bankole, FA Badu, AB Salami, AO (2023). Variation in the morphology and effector profiles of<italic>Exserohilum turcicum</italic>isolates associated with the Northern Corn Leaf Blight of maize in Nigeria. BMC Plant Biology 23:386. 10.1186/s12870-023-04385-7. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Bankole</surname>
							<given-names>FA</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Badu</surname>
							<given-names>AB</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Salami</surname>
							<given-names>AO</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2023</year>
					<article-title>Variation in the morphology and effector profiles of Exserohilum turcicum isolates associated with the Northern Corn Leaf Blight of maize in Nigeria</article-title>
					<source>BMC Plant Biology</source>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12870-023-04385-7</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B5">
				<mixed-citation> Cañedo, V Ames, T (2004). Manual de laboratorio para el manejo de hongos entomopatógenos. Centro Internacional de la Papa (CIP). Lima, Perú. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Cañedo</surname>
							<given-names>V</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ames</surname>
							<given-names>T</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2004</year>
					<chapter-title>Manual de laboratorio para el manejo de hongos entomopatógenos</chapter-title>
					<source>Centro Internacional de la Papa (CIP)</source>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B6">
				<mixed-citation> Chen, B Han, H Hou, J Bao, F Tan, H Lou, X Wang, G Zhao, F (2022). Control of Maize Sheath Blight and Elicit Induced Systemic Resistance Using<italic>Paenibacillus polymyxa</italic>Strain SF05. Microorganisms 10(7):1318. 10.3390/microorganisms10071318. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Chen</surname>
							<given-names>B</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Han</surname>
							<given-names>H</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hou</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bao</surname>
							<given-names>F</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Tan</surname>
							<given-names>H</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lou</surname>
							<given-names>X</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>G</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zhao</surname>
							<given-names>F</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2022</year>
					<article-title>Control of Maize Sheath Blight and Elicit Induced Systemic Resistance Using Paenibacillus polymyxa Strain SF05</article-title>
					<source>Microorganisms</source>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/microorganisms10071318</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B7">
				<mixed-citation> De Mendiburu, F Yaseen, M (2020). Agricolae: Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. R package version 1.4.0. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://cran.r-project.org/package=agricolae">https://cran.r-project.org/package=agricolae</ext-link>. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>De Mendiburu</surname>
							<given-names>F</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Yaseen</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2020</year>
					<article-title>Agricolae: Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research</article-title>
					<source>R package version 1.4.0</source>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://cran.r-project.org/package=agricolae">https://cran.r-project.org/package=agricolae</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B8">
				<mixed-citation> De Rossi, RL (2020). Aportes epidemiológicos para la generación de herramientas de manejo del tizón foliar común del maíz (<italic>Exserohilum turcicum</italic>(Pass.) Leonard &amp; Suggs). Dissertation, Universidad Católica de Córdoba. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>De Rossi</surname>
							<given-names>RL</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2020</year>
					<article-title>Aportes epidemiológicos para la generación de herramientas de manejo del tizón foliar común del maíz (Exserohilum turcicum (Pass.) Leonard &amp; Suggs)</article-title>
					<source>Dissertation, Universidad Católica de Córdoba</source>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B9">
				<mixed-citation> Félix-Gastélum, R Lizárraga-Sánchez, GJ Maldonado-Mendoza, IE Leyva-Madrigal, KY Herrera-Rodríguez, G Espinoza, SM (2018). Confirmation of the identity of<italic>Exserohilum turcicum</italic>, causal agent of maize leaf blight in Sinaloa. Revista Mexicana de Fitopatología 36(3):468-478. 10.18781/R.MEX.FIT.1803-1. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Félix-Gastélum</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lizárraga-Sánchez</surname>
							<given-names>GJ</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Maldonado-Mendoza</surname>
							<given-names>IE</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Leyva-Madrigal</surname>
							<given-names>KY</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Herrera-Rodríguez</surname>
							<given-names>G</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Espinoza</surname>
							<given-names>SM</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2018</year>
					<article-title>Confirmation of the identity of Exserohilum turcicum, causal agent of maize leaf blight in Sinaloa</article-title>
					<source>Revista Mexicana de Fitopatología</source>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18781/R.MEX.FIT.1803-1</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B10">
				<mixed-citation> Fu, Y Yan, R Liu, D Zhao, J Song, J Wang, X Cui, L Zhang, J Xiang, W (2019). Characterization of<italic>Sinomonas gamaensis</italic>sp. nov., a novel soil bacterium with antifungal activity against<italic>Exserohilum turcicum</italic>. Microorganisms 7(6):170. 10.3390/microorganisms7060170. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Fu</surname>
							<given-names>Y</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Yan</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Liu</surname>
							<given-names>D</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zhao</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Song</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>X</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Cui</surname>
							<given-names>L</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zhang</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Xiang</surname>
							<given-names>W</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2019</year>
					<article-title>Characterization of Sinomonas gamaensis sp. nov., a novel soil bacterium with antifungal activity against Exserohilum turcicum</article-title>
					<source>Microorganisms</source>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/microorganisms7060170</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B11">
				<mixed-citation> Gao, Z Zhang, B Liu, H Jucai, H Zhang, Y (2017). Identification of endophytic<italic>Bacillus velezensis</italic>ZSY-1 strain and antifungal activity of its volatile compounds against<italic>Alternaria solani</italic>and<italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic>. Biological Control 105:27-39. 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2016.11.007. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Gao</surname>
							<given-names>Z</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zhang</surname>
							<given-names>B</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Liu</surname>
							<given-names>H</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Jucai</surname>
							<given-names>H</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zhang</surname>
							<given-names>Y</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2017</year>
					<article-title>Identification of endophytic Bacillus velezensis ZSY-1 strain and antifungal activity of its volatile compounds against Alternaria solani and Botrytis cinerea</article-title>
					<source>Biological Control</source>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biocontrol.2016.11.007</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B12">
				<mixed-citation> Hernández, RM Madrid, H Tan, YP da Cunha, KC Gené, J Guarro, J Crous, PW (2018). Multi-locus phylogeny and taxonomy of<italic>Exserohilum</italic>. Persoonia 41:71-108. 10.3767/persoonia.2018.41.05. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Hernández</surname>
							<given-names>RM</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Madrid</surname>
							<given-names>H</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Tan</surname>
							<given-names>YP</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>da Cunha</surname>
							<given-names>KC</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gené</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Guarro</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Crous</surname>
							<given-names>PW</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2018</year>
					<article-title>Multi-locus phylogeny and taxonomy of Exserohilum</article-title>
					<source>Persoonia</source>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3767/persoonia.2018.41.05</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B13">
				<mixed-citation> Kumar, S Stecher, G Li, M Knyaz, C Tamura, K (2018). MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35(6):1547-1549. 10.1093/molbev/msy096. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Kumar</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Stecher</surname>
							<given-names>G</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Li</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Knyaz</surname>
							<given-names>C</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Tamura</surname>
							<given-names>K</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2018</year>
					<article-title>MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms</article-title>
					<source>Molecular Biology and Evolution</source>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/molbev/msy096</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B14">
				<mixed-citation> Nieuwoudt, A Human, MP Craven, M Crampton, BG (2018). Genetic differentiation in populations of<italic>Exserohilum turcicum</italic>from maize and sorghum in South Africa. Plant Pathology 67:1483-1491. 10.1111/ppa.12858. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Nieuwoudt</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Human</surname>
							<given-names>MP</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Craven</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Crampton</surname>
							<given-names>BG</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2018</year>
					<article-title>Genetic differentiation in populations of Exserohilum turcicum from maize and sorghum in South Africa</article-title>
					<source>Plant Pathology</source>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ppa.12858</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B15">
				<mixed-citation> Poulaki, EG Tjamos, SE (2023). <italic>Bacillus</italic>species: factories of plant protective volatile organic compounds. Journal of Applied Microbiology 134(3):lxad037. 10.1093/jambio/lxad037. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Poulaki</surname>
							<given-names>EG</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Tjamos</surname>
							<given-names>SE</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2023</year>
					<article-title>Bacillus species: factories of plant protective volatile organic compounds</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Applied Microbiology</source>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jambio/lxad037</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B16">
				<mixed-citation> Riera, N Davyt, D Durán, R Iraola, G Lemanceau, P Bajsa, N (2023). An antibiotic produced by<italic>Pseudomonas fluorescens</italic>CFBP2392 with antifungal activity against<italic>Rhizoctonia solani</italic>. Frontiers in Microbiology 14:1286926. 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1286926. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Riera</surname>
							<given-names>N</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Davyt</surname>
							<given-names>D</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Durán</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Iraola</surname>
							<given-names>G</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lemanceau</surname>
							<given-names>P</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bajsa</surname>
							<given-names>N</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2023</year>
					<article-title>An antibiotic produced by Pseudomonas fluorescens CFBP2392 with antifungal activity against Rhizoctonia solani</article-title>
					<source>Frontiers in Microbiology</source>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2023.1286926</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B17">
				<mixed-citation> Vincent, JM (1947). Distortion of fungal hyphae in the presence of certain inhibitors. Nature 159(4051):850. 10.1038/159850b0. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Vincent</surname>
							<given-names>JM</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1947</year>
					<article-title>Distortion of fungal hyphae in the presence of certain inhibitors</article-title>
					<source>Nature</source>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/159850b0</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B18">
				<mixed-citation> Wang, Z Zhong, T Chen, K Du, M (2020). Antifungal activity of volatile organic compounds produced by<italic>Pseudomonas fluorescens</italic>ZX and potential biocontrol of blue mold decay on postharvest citrus. Food Control. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107499. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>Z</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zhong</surname>
							<given-names>T</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Chen</surname>
							<given-names>K</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Du</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2020</year>
					<article-title>Antifungal activity of volatile organic compounds produced by Pseudomonas fluorescens ZX and potential biocontrol of blue mold decay on postharvest citrus</article-title>
					<source>Food Control</source>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107499</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B19">
				<mixed-citation> White, TJ Bruns, T Lee, S Taylor, J (1990). Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications. Academic Press, New York, 315-322. 10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>White</surname>
							<given-names>TJ</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bruns</surname>
							<given-names>T</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lee</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Taylor</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1990</year>
					<article-title>Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics</article-title>
					<source>PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications</source>
					<publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B20">
				<mixed-citation> Wise, K Mueller, D (2011). Are fungicides no longer just for fungi? An analysis of foliar fungicide use in corn. APSnet Features. 10.1094/APSnetFeature-2011-0531. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Wise</surname>
							<given-names>K</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mueller</surname>
							<given-names>D</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2011</year>
					<article-title>Are fungicides no longer just for fungi? An analysis of foliar fungicide use in corn</article-title>
					<source>APSnet Features</source>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/APSnetFeature-2011-0531</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B21">
				<mixed-citation> Wu, Y Zhou, J Li, C Ma, Y (2019). Antifungal and plant growth promotion activity of volatile organic compounds produced by<italic>Bacillus amyloliquefaciens</italic>. Microbiologyopen 8(8):e00813. 10.1002/mbo3.813. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Wu</surname>
							<given-names>Y</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zhou</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Li</surname>
							<given-names>C</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ma</surname>
							<given-names>Y</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2019</year>
					<article-title>Antifungal and plant growth promotion activity of volatile organic compounds produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens</article-title>
					<source>Microbiologyopen</source>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/mbo3.813</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B22">
				<mixed-citation> Zhao, X Zhou, J Tian, R Liu, Y (2023). Microbial volatile organic compounds: Antifungal mechanisms, applications, and challenges. Frontiers in Microbiology 13:922450. 10.3389/fmicb.2022.922450. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Zhao</surname>
							<given-names>X</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zhou</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Tian</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Liu</surname>
							<given-names>Y</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2023</year>
					<article-title>Microbial volatile organic compounds: Antifungal mechanisms, applications, and challenges</article-title>
					<source>Frontiers in Microbiology</source>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2022.922450</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B23">
				<mixed-citation> Takhtajan, A (2009). Class Magnoliopsida (Dicotyledons). Flowering Plants. Springer Science, Amsterdam, Netherlands. 7-588. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://books.google.es/books?id=oumyfO-NHuUC">https://books.google.es/books?id=oumyfO-NHuUC</ext-link>. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Takhtajan</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2009</year>
					<chapter-title>Class Magnoliopsida (Dicotyledons)</chapter-title>
					<source>Flowering Plants</source>
					<publisher-name>Springer Science</publisher-name>
					<fpage>7</fpage>
					<lpage>588</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://books.google.es/books?id=oumyfO-NHuUC">https://books.google.es/books?id=oumyfO-NHuUC</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B24">
				<mixed-citation> Singleton, V Rossi, J (1965). Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagent. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 16:144-158. 10.5344/ajev.1965.16.3.144. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Singleton</surname>
							<given-names>V</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Rossi</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1965</year>
					<article-title>Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagent</article-title>
					<source>American Journal of Enology and Viticulture</source>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5344/ajev.1965.16.3.144</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B25">
				<mixed-citation> Salih, EY Julkunen-Titto, R Luukkanen, O Fyhrqvist, P (2022). Anti-Candida Activity of Extracts Containing Ellagitannins, Triterpenes and Flavonoids of<italic>Terminalia brownii</italic>, a Medicinal Plant Growing in Semi-Arid and Savannah Woodland in Sudan. Pharmaceutics 14(11):2469. 10.3390/pharmaceutics14112469. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Salih</surname>
							<given-names>EY</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Julkunen-Titto</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Luukkanen</surname>
							<given-names>O</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Fyhrqvist</surname>
							<given-names>P</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2022</year>
					<article-title>Anti-Candida Activity of Extracts Containing Ellagitannins, Triterpenes and Flavonoids of Terminalia brownii, a Medicinal Plant Growing in Semi-Arid and Savannah Woodland in Sudan</article-title>
					<source>Pharmaceutics</source>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/pharmaceutics14112469</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B26">
				<mixed-citation> Peng, L Yang, S Cheng, YJ Chen, F Pan, S Fan, G (2012). Antifungal activity and action mode of pinocembrin from propolis against<italic>Penicillium italicum</italic>. Food Science and Biotechnology 21:1533-1539. 10.1007/s10068-012-0204-0. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Peng</surname>
							<given-names>L</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Yang</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Cheng</surname>
							<given-names>YJ</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Chen</surname>
							<given-names>F</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pan</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Fan</surname>
							<given-names>G</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2012</year>
					<article-title>Antifungal activity and action mode of pinocembrin from propolis against Penicillium italicum</article-title>
					<source>Food Science and Biotechnology</source>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10068-012-0204-0</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B27">
				<mixed-citation> Yordanov, M Dimitrova, P Patkar, S Saso, L Ivanovska, N (2008). Inhibition of<italic>Candida albicans</italic>extracellular enzyme activity by selected natural substances and their application in Candida infection. Journal of Microbiology 54:435-440. 10.1139/w08-029. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Yordanov</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Dimitrova</surname>
							<given-names>P</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Patkar</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Saso</surname>
							<given-names>L</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ivanovska</surname>
							<given-names>N</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2008</year>
					<article-title>Inhibition of Candida albicans extracellular enzyme activity by selected natural substances and their application in Candida infection</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Microbiology</source>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/w08-029</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
		</ref-list>
	</back>
	<sub-article article-type="translation" id="s1" xml:lang="es">
		<front-stub>
			<article-categories>
				<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
					<subject>Articles</subject>
				</subj-group>
			</article-categories>
			<title-group>
				<article-title>Aislamiento y caracterización de <italic>Exserohilum turcicum,</italic> y su inhibición <italic>in vitro</italic> por compuestos orgánicos volátiles producidos por rizobacterias</article-title>
			</title-group>
			<abstract>
				<title>Resumen:</title>
				<sec>
					<title>Antecedentes/Objetivo. </title>
					<p>El control biológico es una estrategia promisoria para el manejo de enfermedades en la agricultura. En el presente estudio, se evaluó el potencial antifúngico de los compuestos orgánicos volátiles emitidos por rizobacterias, en el crecimiento y capacidad infectiva de cuatro aislamientos de <italic>E. turcicum</italic> obtenidos de plantas de maíz sintomáticas, en Sinaloa<italic>.</italic> 
 <bold>Materiales y Métodos.</bold> Los aislamientos fúngicos fueron caracterizados morfo- lógica y molecularmente, y su patogenicidad se corroboró en un ensayo de hoja desprendida. La capacidad de los COV para inhibir el crecimiento micelial y la infección de hojas de maíz por <italic>E. turcicum</italic>, se evaluó en ensayos <italic>in vitro</italic> en placas Petri divididas. Se determinó cualitativamente la producción de ácido cianhídrico bacteriano. <bold>Resultados.</bold> El crecimiento micelial de <italic>E. turcicum,</italic> se redujo por los COV de al menos una rizobacteria<italic>,</italic> con inhibiciones entre 22 y 63%. La infección de hojas de maíz se redujo entre 63 y 98% en presencia de los COV de las rizobacterias. Se detectó la producción de ácido cianhídrico en las cepas B3 y B9. <bold>Conclusión.</bold> La cepa B95 fue más efectiva en la reducción del crecimiento mice- lial e infección por <italic>E. turcicum</italic>. La producción de ácido cianhídrico podría estar implicada en su efecto antagónico. Se requieren ensayos <italic>in planta</italic>, para corroborar su efectividad, así como caracterizar su perfil de volátiles.</p>
				</sec>
			</abstract>
			<kwd-group xml:lang="es">
				<title>Palabras clave:</title>
				<kwd>Biocontrol</kwd>
				<kwd>Bacillus</kwd>
				<kwd>Pseudomonas</kwd>
				<kwd>tizón foliar</kwd>
				<kwd>compuestos volátiles<italic>.</italic></kwd>
			</kwd-group>
		</front-stub>
		<body>
			<sec sec-type="intro">
				<title>Introducción</title>
				<p>El tizón foliar del maíz, causado por <italic>Exserohilum turcicum,</italic> es una de las enfer- medades foliares del maíz más importantes en todo el mundo. El desarrollo de la enfermedad se ve favorecido por la alta humedad relativa (&gt; 90%) y temperatura media diaria de 18-26 °C. Los síntomas típicos son lesiones largas (2.5 y 15 cm de longitud), elípticas, y de color verde grisáceo. A medida que la enfermedad se extiende, las lesiones se vuelven bronceadas con zonas oscuras, y coalescen para formar el tizón. La reducción del área fotosintética foliar puede llegar hasta el 65%, ocasionando pérdidas del 15 al 75% en rendimiento (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Félix-Gastélum <italic>et al.,</italic> 2018</xref>). El manejo actual del tizón de maíz, implica el uso de fungicidas sintéticos de los grupos químicos ditiocarbamato, nitrilo, triazol y estrobirulina (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">De Rossi <italic>et al.,</italic> 2020</xref>). Sin embargo, el uso ordinario de fungicidas sintéticos aumenta la presión de selección sobre la población del patógeno, lo que lleva al desarrollo de resistencia a los fungicidas e inconsistencias en el control químico (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Wise y Mueller, 2011</xref>).</p>
				<p>En los últimos años, la bioprotección ha surgido como una alternativa al control químico de múltiples enfermedades de las plantas. Algunas rizobacterias tienen gran potencial para la supresión de fitopatógenos, debido a su capacidad para pro- ducir una amplia gama de enzimas líticas, y compuestos antimicrobianos difusibles y volátiles, que limitan el crecimiento y la infección de fitopatógenos, además de estimular el crecimiento de las plantas, mediante la producción y modulación de fitohormonas (Sartori <italic>et al.,</italic> 2015, 2017; Sehrawat <italic>et al.,</italic> 2022).</p>
				<p>Los compuestos orgánicos volátiles (COV) son metabolitos secundarios de bajo peso molecular y baja polaridad, por lo que, pueden difundirse fácilmente en el suelo y la atmósfera (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Zhao <italic>et al</italic>., 2023</xref>). Diversos COV emitidos por rizobacterias son capaces de inhibir el crecimiento de hongos fitopatógenos, por lo que, tienen potencial para emplearse en el control de enfermedades <italic>in planta</italic> y post cosecha (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Poulaki y Tjamos, 2023</xref>; Zhao <italic>et al</italic>., 2023). Este efecto antifúngico se atribuye a la alteración de la integridad de la pared celular, la fluidez de la membrana celular, disrupción del balance redox, e incluso a la alteración del transcriptoma del patógeno, disminuyendo la expresión de genes de virulencia y genes de metabolismo energético.</p>
				<p>Entre los principales géneros de rizobacterias productoras de COV con activi- dad antifúngica, encontramos a <italic>Bacillus</italic>, <italic>Pseudomonas</italic>, <italic>Paenibacillus</italic>, <italic>Brevibaci- llus</italic> y <italic>Ralstonia</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Zhao <italic>et al</italic>., 2023</xref>). Además de su actividad antifúngica, algunos COV bacterianos promueven el crecimiento e inducen resistencia sistémica en las plantas, lo que les permite una defensa más rápida y eficaz contra los patógenos (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Poulaki y Tjamos, 2023</xref>).</p>
				<p>El ácido cianhídrico o cianuro de hidrógeno (HCN), es un COV con actividad antimicrobiana, que se une al citocromo c oxidasa, e interfiere con la respiración celular (Anand <italic>et al</italic>., 2023). Algunas rizobacterias como <italic>Pseudomonas</italic>, utilizan esta molécula como uno de sus principales mecanismos para combatir patógenos en las plantas (Anand <italic>et al</italic>., 2020).</p>
				<p>Por lo anterior, los objetivos de este estudio fueron: 1) obtener y caracterizar aisla- mientos de <italic>Exserohilum turcicum</italic> de maíz; 2) evaluar el efecto de los COV produ- cidos por rizobacterias, sobre el crecimiento micelial y la infección <italic>in vitro</italic> de <italic>E. turcicum</italic>; y 3) determinar la producción de ácido cianhídrico o cianuro de hidró- geno (HCN), importante COV con efecto antifúngico, producido por rizobacterias.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec sec-type="materials|methods">
				<title>Materiales y métodos</title>
				<p><bold>Obtención y purificación de los aislamientos fúngicos<italic>.</italic> 
</bold> Durante febrero y marzo de 2020, se colectaron hojas de maíz con síntomas típicos de tizón foliar, de los municipios Ahome, El Fuerte y Guasave, en Sinaloa, México. Las hojas se cortaron en trozos pequeños (25 mm<sup>2</sup>) a partir del borde de la lesión, se desinfestaron por 3 min en una solución de hipoclorito de sodio al 0.5%, y se lavaron tres veces con agua destilada estéril. Los trozos de tejido desinfestados se colocaron en placas de Petri con Agar Papa Dextrosa (PDA; MCD LAB, Tlalnepantla, Estado de México), suplementado con neomicina (0.1125 mg/mL) y sulfato de estreptomicina (0.5 mg/ mL), y se incubaron a 25 °C por 3 días. Las colonias fúngicas se transfirieron a placas con PDA y se incubaron a 25 °C por 14 días. Se obtuvieron cultivos monospóricos y se preservaron en papel filtro a 4 °C (Hiruma y Saijo, 2016).</p>
				<p>Caracterización morfológica de los aislamientos fúngicos. Para evaluar las ca- racterísticas morfológicas de los aislamientos, se cultivaron en PDA y agar-V8, y se incubaron a 25 °C por 10 y 15 días, respectivamente. La tasa de crecimiento micelial y las características macroscópicas de las colonias (textura, tipo de borde, y pigmentación frontal e inversa) se evaluaron en PDA. En un microscopio Axio Imager M2 (Carl Zeiss), se evaluó la forma, número de septos, longitud y ancho de 30 conidios de cada aislado cultivado en V8</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>Identificación molecular de los aislamientos fúngicos</title>
				<p>Extracción de ADN, PCR y secuenciación. El ADN genómico se extrajo a partir de 50 mg de micelio fresco, cultivado en medio PDA por 10 días, utilizando el kit de ADN genómico YeaStarTM (N. cat D2002, Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, EUA), de acuerdo con el protocolo del fabricante. La amplificación de la región ITS, los genes de la actina (<italic>act</italic>) y la segunda subunidad más grande de la ARN polimerasa II (<italic>rpb2</italic>), se realizó con los cebadores ITS1/ ITS4 (White <italic>et al.,</italic> 1990), Ex-actF/Ex-actR (5’ - CCCCGAGCAGTCTTCCGTA - 3’/5’ - GTACGTCCAGA- GGCGTACAG - 3’; 480 pb) y Ex-rpb2F/Ex-rpb2R (5’ - CTTCGTCGAACAAA- YACWCCTG - 3’/5’ - CRCAGTGRGTRTAGGCATGG - 3’; 760 pb), respectivamente. Los cebadores para <italic>act</italic> y <italic>rpb2</italic> se diseñaron para este estudio, utilizando el programa Primer3 (Untergasser <italic>et al</italic>., 2012). La PCR se realizó en un termocicla- dor Apollo ATC-201 (Nyx Technik, San Diego, CA, EUA) con 1 ng de ADN, 1.5 mM de MgCl<sub>2</sub>, 0.2 mM de cada dNTP, 0.5 mM de cada cebador y 1 U de ADN polimerasa (Invitrogen, Brasil, Cat. Nº 11615-050) en un volumen final de 25 mL. El programa de PCR consistió en 5 min de desnaturalización inicial a 94 °C, se- guido de 35 ciclos de desnaturalización a 95 °C por 40 s, anillamiento a 55 °C para ITS y 60 °C para <italic>act</italic> y <italic>rpb2</italic> por 40 s, 1 min de extensión a 72 °C y una extensión final a 72 °C por 5 min. Los productos de PCR se secuenciaron en Macrogen Inc. (Seúl, Corea del Sur).</p>
				<p>Análisis filogenético multigen. Las secuencias se editaron en BioEdit v 7.0.5.3 (Hall, 1999) y se compararon en la base de datos del NCBI utilizando el algoritmo BLASTn. Se generó un alineamiento concatenado <italic>act+ITS+rpb2</italic> con MUSCLE (Edgar, 2004), implementado en MEGA X (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Kumar <italic>et al.,</italic> 2018</xref>). El esquema de particiones se evaluó en PartitionFinder v 1.1.1 (Lanfear <italic>et al.,</italic> 2012), con base al criterio de información de Akaike (AIC). La reconstrucción filogenética se realizó con el método de Máxima Verosimilitud (ML) en RAXML v 7.2.8 (Stamatakis, 2006), utilizando el modelo GTRGAMMAI y 1000 réplicas bootstrap. El filograma se editó utilizando iTOL (Letunic y Bork, 2021; https://itol.embl.de/).</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>Prueba de patogenicidad</title>
				<p>Ensayo en hoja desprendida. La patogenicidad de cuatro aislamientos de <italic>E. tur- cicum</italic> se evaluó siguiendo la metodología de Perochon y Doohan (2016), con mo- dificaciones. Se emplearon fragmentos de hoja de 6 cm de largo, de la segunda hoja verdadera de plantas de maíz de 20 días de edad, cultivadas en condiciones controladas en laboratorio. Los fragmentos de hoja fueron previamente desin- festados superficialmente con una solución de hipoclorito de sodio al 0.75% por</p>
				<p>1 min, seguido de cuatro lavados con agua destilada estéril. Una vez desinfectados, se colocaron en cajas de Petri cuadradas (100 mm × 100 mm), con el lado adaxial hacia arriba. Los extremos de las hojas se colocaron entre dos capas de agua agar, a modo de “sándwich”, adicionado con 50 μg/mL de 6-bencilamino purina (BAP; Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Alemania) (Aregbesola <italic>et al.,</italic> 2020).</p>
				<p>Las hojas se inocularon con tres gotas de 5 mL (~ 120 conidios) de una sus- pensión de conidios a 2.4 × 10<sup>4</sup> conidios/mL, obtenidos de un cultivo en agar V8 solidificado de 15 días de edad. Como testigos, se utilizaron hojas inoculadas con una solución estéril de Tween 80 al 1%. Las placas se incubaron a 25 °C, con un fotoperiodo de 12 h luz/12 h oscuridad, por 6 días, en un diseño completamente aleatorizado, con tres repeticiones por tratamiento. El ensayo se realizó dos veces.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title><bold>Efecto antifúngico de los COV bacterianos sobre <italic>E. turcicum</italic>
</bold></title>
				<p>Cepas bacterianas. Se evaluó el efecto antagónico de seis rizobacterias previa- mente aisladas y caracterizadas por Morales-Ruíz (2022). Las cepas B2 (<italic>Staphylo- coccus warneri</italic>), B3 (<italic>Bacillus aryabhattai</italic>), B9 (<italic>Staphylococcus saccharolyticus</italic>), B11 (<italic>Acinetobacter radioresistens</italic>) y B15 (<italic>Bacillus velezensis</italic>) fueron aisladas de la rizosfera de <italic>Arundo donax</italic> (carrizo), y la cepa B95 (<italic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic>) se obtuvo de la rizosfera de maíz.</p>
				<p>Ensayo en placa dividida. El ensayo de antagonismo por COV se realizó en pla- cas de Petri con dos divisiones (90 mm de diámetro), que contenían Agar Nutritivo (AN) y PDA, respectivamente. Las cepas bacterianas se inocularon por estría en el lado de la placa con AN, y se incubaron a 25 °C por 12 h. Luego, se inoculó un dis- co de PDA con crecimiento micelial (5 mm de diámetro) del aislado fúngico, en el lado de la placa de Petri que contenía PDA. Inmediatamente, las placas se sellaron e incubaron a 25 °C por 10 días, en un arreglo completamente aleatorizado, con cinco repeticiones para cada combinación bacteria/hongo. Como testigos, se utilizaron placas de Petri con PDA inoculadas con el aislamiento fúngico en ausencia de las bacterias. Se midió el diámetro de las colonias fúngicas y se calculó el porcentaje de inhibición con la fórmula propuesta por <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Vincent (1947</xref>). El ensayo se realizó dos veces, de forma independiente, en diferentes tiempos.</p>
				<p><bold>Ensayo en hoja desprendida<italic>.</italic> 
</bold> Las bacterias que mostraron porcentajes de inhibi- ción ≥40%, con al menos dos aislamientos de <italic>E. turcicum</italic> en el ensayo de placas di- vididas, fueron seleccionadas para evaluar su efecto en la reducción de la infección de hojas de maíz por cuatro aislamientos de <italic>E. turcicum</italic>. El ensayo se realizó en placas de Petri divididas (100 mm × 15 mm); de un lado se colocó la hoja de maíz, y se inoculó con una suspensión de conidios fúngicos, siguiendo la metodología previamente descrita para la prueba de patogenicidad. Del otro lado de la placa, se colocó una caja de Petri de 35 mm de diámetro, con la cepa bacteriana inoculada por estría, en medio AN. Se usaron testigos de patogenicidad para cada aislamiento fúngico, en el que se colocó la placa Petri (35 mm) con AN estéril, sin bacteria inoculada. Además, se usaron testigos bacterianos en los que las hojas no se inocularon con los hongos, para descartar un posible efecto fitotóxico de los COV bacterianos en la hoja de maíz, que pudiera interferir con la estimación del daño ocasionado por el hongo. Las placas se sellaron herméticamente para evitar la fuga de los COV. Se realizaron cuatro réplicas por tratamiento. Las placas se distribuyeron en un diseño completamente al azar, y se incubaron a 25 ºC, con un fotoperiodo de 16 h luz/ 8 h oscuridad, por seis días. El porcentaje de área foliar afectada (%AFA) se estimó utilizando el software Image J versión 1.8.0 (Schindelin <italic>et al.,</italic> 2012). El ensayo se realizó dos veces de forma independiente, en diferentes tiempos.</p>
				<sec>
					<title>Prueba de producción de ácido cianhídrico (HCN).</title>
					<p>Se evaluó la producción de HCN en cuatro cepas bacterianas, siguiendo la metodología reportada por <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Anand <italic>et al.</italic> (2020</xref>). Cuadros (1 cm<sup>2</sup>) de papel filtro, se sumergieron hasta saturación en el reactivo Feigl y Anger, el cual consta de 10 mL de cloroformo (CTR Scientific, Ciudad de México, México), 50 mg de acetoacetato de etilo de cobre (II) (Thermo scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, EUA) y 50 mg de 4,4-metilen bis (N, N-dime- tilanilina) (Sigma Aldrich, San Luis, Misuri, EUA). El papel filtro se retiró y se dejó secar toda la noche a temperatura ambiente (25 °C). Las bacterias se sembraron por estría sobre el AN contenido en placas de Petri (60 mm de diámetro), luego se colocó un papel filtro en el lado interno de la tapa de la caja de Petri. Se realizaron tres réplicas por tratamiento. Las placas se sellaron y se incubaron a 25 °C por 48h. Se consideraron cepas positivas a la producción de HCN si el papel filtro viraba a color azul.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<title>Análisis estadístico.</title>
					<p>Los análisis estadísticos se realizaron en R Studio versión 1.4.1106 (RStudio Team 2020), utilizando el paquete “<italic>agricolae</italic>” (de Mendiburu, 2020). El diámetro de la colonia fúngica y el %AFA se analizaron con un análisis de varianza (ANOVA) y la prueba de separación de medias post hoc de Tukey (a = 0.05). El %AFA se transformó con la fórmula del arcoseno previo al análisis estadístico. La normalidad de los residuales se corroboró con la prueba de Shapiro Wilks y mediante un gráfico QQ Normal.</p>
				</sec>
			</sec>
			<sec sec-type="results">
				<title>Resultados</title>
				<p>Caracterización morfológica de los aislamientos fúngicos. Se obtuvieron cuatro aislamientos monospóricos, cuyas características morfológicas variaron ligeramente (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Cuadro S1</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">S2</xref>). Las tasas de crecimiento oscilaron entre 7.56 a 19.89 mm/día. Las colonias presentaron una coloración verde olivo en el anverso, con textura algodonosa y borde fimbriado (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">Figura 1</xref>A). Por el reverso presentaron un color negro oliváceo, con márgenes color crema o blanco (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">Figura 1</xref>B). Los conidios de los cuatro aislamientos eran ahusados, ligeramente curvos a rectos, y alargados, de color olivo, con hilium prominente (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">Figura 1</xref>C), longitud de 54.49 a 124.34 µm (91.77 µm ± 16.75), ancho de 11.81 a 29.86 µm (21.01 µm ± 3.24), y seis septos en promedio (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">Cuadro S2</xref>).</p>
				<p>
					<fig id="f6">
						<label>Figura 1</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Caracterización de los aislamientos de <italic>Exserohilum turcicum</italic>. <bold>A-C</bold> Características morfológicas del aislado re- presentativo Bac7-2. <bold>A)</bold> Vista frontal del cultivo en PDA; <bold>B)</bold> Vista trasera del cultivo en PDA; <bold>C)</bold> conidio; <bold>D</bold> Filograma de Máxima Verosimilitud inferido a partir de la matriz combinada de los marcadores <italic>act</italic>+ITS+<italic>rpb2</italic> de <italic>Exserohilum</italic>.</title>
						</caption>
						<graphic xlink:href="2007-8080-rmfi-42-04-RMEXFIT202414-gf6.gif"/>
					</fig>
				</p>
				<sec>
					<title>Identificación molecular de los aislamientos fúngicos.</title>
					<p>La comparación de se- cuencias de los genes <italic>act</italic> y <italic>rpb2</italic>, así como de la región ITS, mostraron porcentajes de identidad de 96.63 a 100%, con la especie <italic>Exserohilum turcicum</italic>. Las secuencias de los aislamientos se depositaron en la base de datos GenBank, y los números de acceso se presentan en la <xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Cuadro S1</xref>. En la <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">figura 1D</xref>, se presenta el filograma inferido a partir del alineamiento con- catenado <italic>act</italic>+ITS+<italic>rpb</italic>2, donde se muestra que los aislamientos Bac7-2, Por14-1, Moc2-1 y Moc2-11 pertenecen a <italic>Exserohilum turcicum,</italic> puesto que se agrupan en un mismo clado con el aislado tipo <italic>E. turcicum</italic> CBS 330.64 (bootstrap de 100%).</p>
					<p>Pruebas de patogenicidad. Los cuatro aislamientos de <italic>E. turcicum</italic> produjeron lesiones típicas en las hojas, evidenciadas en el ensayo de hoja desprendida (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">Figura 2</xref>). Las primeras lesiones tales como manchas cloróticas en el área inoculada, se ob- servaron cuatro días después de la inoculación y progresaron a lesiones necróticas (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">Figura 2</xref>B). Las hojas del tratamiento testigo permanecieron sin lesiones durante el ensayo (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">Figura 2</xref>A).</p>
					<p>
						<fig id="f7">
							<label>Figura 2</label>
							<caption>
								<title>Prueba de patogenicidad. <bold>A</bold> Sistema de hoja desprendida empleado para la confirmación de patogenicidad. <bold>B</bold> Síntomas ocasionados por los aislamientos de <italic>Exserohilum turcicum</italic> en hojas desprendidas de maíz.</title>
							</caption>
							<graphic xlink:href="2007-8080-rmfi-42-04-RMEXFIT202414-gf7.gif"/>
						</fig>
					</p>
				</sec>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title><bold>Efecto antifúngico de los COV bacterianos sobre <italic>E. turcicum</italic>
</bold></title>
				<p>Ensayo en placa dividida. El crecimiento micelial de los aislamientos de <italic>E. turcicum,</italic> excepto el aislamiento Moc2-11, se redujo por los COV de al menos una rizo- bacteria (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f8">Figura 3</xref>; <xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Cuadro 1</xref>). Los COV de las cepas B3 y B95 inhibieron en mayor proporción a los aislamientos fúngicos. Las cepas B9 y B15 solo inhibieron el cre- cimiento de los aislamientos Bac7-2 y Moc2-1, y favorecieron el crecimiento del aislamiento Por14-1. La cepa B15 inhibió mayormente (63.29%), el crecimiento</p>
				<p>
					<fig id="f8">
						<label>Figura 3</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Efecto de los compuestos orgánicos volátiles bacterianos, sobre el crecimiento micelial de <italic>Exserohilum turcicum,</italic> en placas de Petri divididas.</title>
						</caption>
						<graphic xlink:href="2007-8080-rmfi-42-04-RMEXFIT202414-gf8.jpg"/>
					</fig>
				</p>
				<p>
					<table-wrap id="t3">
						<label>Cuadro 1</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Efecto de los compuestos orgánicos volátiles (COV) bacterianos, en el crecimiento micelial de <italic>Exserohilum turci- cum</italic>, en placas divididas.</title>
						</caption>
						<table border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" style="border-collapse: collapse; width: 100%; text-align: center;">
							<thead>
								<tr>
									<th rowspan="2">Cepa</th>
									<th colspan="2">Bac7-2</th>
									<th colspan="2">Moc2-1</th>
									<th colspan="2">Moc2-11</th>
									<th colspan="2">Por14-1</th>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<th>Diámetro colonial</th>
									<th>%ICM</th>
									<th>Diámetro colonial</th>
									<th>%ICM</th>
									<th>Diámetro colonial</th>
									<th>%ICM</th>
									<th>Diámetro colonial</th>
									<th>%ICM</th>
								</tr>
							</thead>
							<tbody>
								<tr>
									<td style="font-weight:bold">B2</td>
									<td>35.21<sup>*,b</sup></td>
									<td>26.13 ± 9.41</td>
									<td>52.95<sup>a</sup></td>
									<td>-</td>
									<td>32.38<sup>a</sup></td>
									<td>-</td>
									<td>49.48<sup>a</sup></td>
									<td>-</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td style="font-weight:bold">B3</td>
									<td>20.86<sup>cd</sup></td>
									<td>56.22 ± 3.08</td>
									<td>31.35<sup>bc</sup></td>
									<td>37.52 ± 8.38</td>
									<td>15.08<sup>b</sup></td>
									<td>39.48 ± 13.81</td>
									<td>19.56<sup>c</sup></td>
									<td>33.83 ± 5.40</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td style="font-weight:bold">B9</td>
									<td>19.91<sup>cd</sup></td>
									<td>58.22 ± 2.19</td>
									<td>25.10<sup>c</sup></td>
									<td>49.99 ± 2.08</td>
									<td>18.02<sup>ab</sup></td>
									<td>27.68 ± 7.70</td>
									<td>48.75<sup>a</sup></td>
									<td>-</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td style="font-weight:bold">B11</td>
									<td>37.14<sup>b</sup></td>
									<td>22.09 ± 3.33</td>
									<td>42.40<sup>ab</sup></td>
									<td>15.52 ± 10.47</td>
									<td>25.42<sup>ab</sup></td>
									<td>-</td>
									<td>47.39<sup>a</sup></td>
									<td>-</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td style="font-weight:bold">B15</td>
									<td>17.50<sup>d</sup></td>
									<td>63.29 ± 1.46</td>
									<td>23.96<sup>c</sup></td>
									<td>52.26 ± 2.19</td>
									<td>21.66<sup>ab</sup></td>
									<td>13.10 ± 4.84</td>
									<td>52.04<sup>a</sup></td>
									<td>-</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td style="font-weight:bold">B95</td>
									<td>28.14<sup>bc</sup></td>
									<td>40.96 ± 5.70</td>
									<td>23.25<sup>c</sup></td>
									<td>53.67 ± 2.34</td>
									<td>15.87<sup>b</sup></td>
									<td>36.33 ± 3.63</td>
									<td>19.12<sup>c</sup></td>
									<td>35.32 ± 8.74</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td style="font-weight:bold">CTRL</td>
									<td>47.67<sup>a</sup></td>
									<td>-</td>
									<td>50.19<sup>a</sup></td>
									<td>-</td>
									<td>24.92<sup>ab</sup></td>
									<td>-</td>
									<td>29.57<sup>b</sup></td>
									<td>-</td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>
						<table-wrap-foot>
							<fn id="TFN9">
								<label><sup>*</sup></label>
								<p> Se muestra la media.</p>
							</fn>
							<fn id="TFN10">
								<p>%ICM Porcentaje de inhibición del crecimiento micelial.</p>
							</fn>
							<fn id="TFN11">
								<p>- Indica que no hubo inhibición.</p>
							</fn>
							<fn id="TFN12">
								<p>Datos seguidos de letras distintas en la misma columna son estadísticamente diferentes de acuerdo con la prueba de Tukey (p &lt; 0.05).</p>
							</fn>
						</table-wrap-foot>
					</table-wrap>
				</p>
				<p>del aislamiento Bac7-2. Las cepas B2 y B11 solo redujeron el crecimiento del ais- lamiento Bac7-2, y favorecieron el crecimiento del aislamiento Por14-1 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Cuadro1</xref>).</p>
				<sec>
					<title><bold>Ensayo en hoja desprendida<italic>.</italic>
</bold></title>
					<p>Derivado de los resultados del ensayo en placa di- vidida, se seleccionaron las cepas B3, B9, B15 y B95, para evaluar el efecto de protección de sus COV ante la infección ocasionada por aislamientos de <italic>E. turci- cum</italic>, en hojas desprendidas de maíz. El %AFA en las hojas expuestas a los COV bacterianos fue estadísticamente menor (p &lt; 0.05) a la registrada en las hojas del grupo testigo (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f9">Figura 4</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">Cuadro 2</xref>). Los valores más bajos del %AFA se registraron en los tratamientos con la cepa B95, con reducciones de la infección que oscilaron entre 95.58 y 98.63% en las hojas infectadas con los aislamientos Por14-1 y Moc2- 1, respectivamente. Los COV de la cepa B15 redujeron la infección (&gt;80%) en las hojas de maíz después de ser inoculadas con los aislamientos fúngicos. No se observó efecto fitotóxico en las hojas de maíz por los COV bacterianos (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f9">Figura 4</xref>).</p>
					<p>Producción de ácido cianhídrico (HCN). Se detectó producción de HCN en las cepas B3 y B95. A las 24 h de incubación de las rizobacterias, se observó viraje de color (de blanco a azul) en el papel filtro sobre el cultivo de la cepa B95, el cual se intensificó a las 48 h de incubación. En la cepa B3, se observó una coloración azul tenue, en el papel filtro a las 48 h. La intensidad del color azul en la cepa B95 su- giere que produce una mayor concentración de este COV que la cepa B3 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f10">Figura 5</xref>).</p>
					<p>
						<fig id="f9">
							<label>Figura 4</label>
							<caption>
								<title>Efecto de los compuestos orgánicos volátiles bacterianos, sobre la capacidad infectiva de <italic>Exserohilum turcicum,</italic> en hojas desprendidas de maíz.</title>
							</caption>
							<graphic xlink:href="2007-8080-rmfi-42-04-RMEXFIT202414-gf9.jpg"/>
						</fig>
					</p>
					<p>
						<table-wrap id="t4">
							<label>Cuadro 2</label>
							<caption>
								<title>Efecto de los compuestos orgánicos volátiles (COV) bacterianos, en la capacidad infectiva de <italic>Exserohilum turci- cum</italic> en hojas desprendidas de maíz.</title>
							</caption>
							<table border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" style="border-collapse: collapse; width: 100%; text-align: center;">
								<thead>
									<tr>
										<th rowspan="2">Cepa</th>
										<th colspan="2">Bac7-2</th>
										<th colspan="2">Moc2-1</th>
										<th colspan="2">Moc2-11</th>
										<th colspan="2">Por14-1</th>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<th>%AFA</th>
										<th>%RI</th>
										<th>%AFA</th>
										<th>%RI</th>
										<th>%AFA</th>
										<th>%RI</th>
										<th>%AFA</th>
										<th>%RI</th>
									</tr>
								</thead>
								<tbody>
									<tr>
										<td style="font-weight:bold">B3</td>
										<td>4.23<sup>*,c</sup></td>
										<td>92.82 ± 1.92</td>
										<td>8.93<sup>b</sup></td>
										<td>84.17 ± 4.79</td>
										<td>4.47<sup>b</sup></td>
										<td>89.98 ± 4.74</td>
										<td>16.63<sup>b</sup></td>
										<td>63.74 ± 12.08</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td style="font-weight:bold">B9</td>
										<td>18.41<sup>b</sup></td>
										<td>68.82 ± 7.24</td>
										<td>4.44<sup>bc</sup></td>
										<td>92.12 ± 2.80</td>
										<td>5.48<sup>b</sup></td>
										<td>87.71 ± 3.98</td>
										<td>11.47<sup>b</sup></td>
										<td>74.97 ± 7.59</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td style="font-weight:bold">B15</td>
										<td>7.12<sup>bc</sup></td>
										<td>87.92 ± 4.22</td>
										<td>7.59<sup>b</sup></td>
										<td>86.55 ± 4.17</td>
										<td>8.48<sup>b</sup></td>
										<td>80.98 ± 4.88</td>
										<td>4.85<sup>b</sup></td>
										<td>89.40 ± 5.26</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td style="font-weight:bold">B95</td>
										<td>1.54<sup>c</sup></td>
										<td>97.37 ± 1.32</td>
										<td>0.76<sup>c</sup></td>
										<td>98.63 ± 0.28</td>
										<td>1.23<sup>b</sup></td>
										<td>97.24 ± 1.04</td>
										<td>2.02<sup>b</sup></td>
										<td>95.58 ± 1.85</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td style="font-weight:bold">CTRL</td>
										<td>59.06<sup>a</sup></td>
										<td>-</td>
										<td>56.48<sup>a</sup></td>
										<td>-</td>
										<td>44.65<sup>a</sup></td>
										<td>-</td>
										<td>45.87<sup>a</sup></td>
										<td>-</td>
									</tr>
								</tbody>
							</table>
							<table-wrap-foot>
								<fn id="TFN13">
									<p>%AFA Porcentaje de área foliar afectada.</p>
								</fn>
								<fn id="TFN14">
									<p>%RI Porcentaje de reducción de la infección.</p>
								</fn>
								<fn id="TFN15">
									<label><sup>*</sup></label>
									<p> Se muestra la media.</p>
								</fn>
								<fn id="TFN16">
									<p>Datos seguidos de letras distintas en la misma columna son estadísticamente diferentes de acuerdo con la prueba de Tukey (p &lt; 0.05).</p>
								</fn>
							</table-wrap-foot>
						</table-wrap>
					</p>
					<p>
						<fig id="f10">
							<label>Figura 5</label>
							<caption>
								<title>Detección de ácido cianhídrico volátil, emitido por rizobacterias.</title>
							</caption>
							<graphic xlink:href="2007-8080-rmfi-42-04-RMEXFIT202414-gf10.jpg"/>
						</fig>
					</p>
				</sec>
			</sec>
			<sec sec-type="discussion">
				<title>Discusión</title>
				<p>Las características morfométricas y microscópicas de los aislamientos fúngicos, fueron similares a las reportadas para otros aislamientos de <italic>E. turcicum</italic> de la re- gión (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Félix-Gastélum <italic>et al</italic>., 2018</xref>), y del mundo (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Hernández-Rastrepo <italic>et al</italic>., 2018</xref>). El análisis filogenético multigen corroboró la identidad de los cuatro aislamientos fúngicos patogénicos.</p>
				<p>La variación observada en cuanto a la severidad de la enfermedad inducida por los aislamientos, ha sido reportado en otros estudios, y se ha atribuido a la alta diversidad genética en las poblaciones de esta especie fúngica, aunado a la suscep- tibilidad de las variedades de maíz y/o a la combinación de ambos (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ahangar <italic>et al</italic>., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Nieuwoudt <italic>et al</italic>., 2018</xref>; Cui <italic>et al</italic>., 2022; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Bankole <italic>et al</italic>., 2023</xref>).</p>
				<p>Se ha comprobado que cepas de géneros bacterianos como <italic>Pseudomonas</italic>, <italic>Ba- cillus</italic>, <italic>Pantoea</italic>, <italic>Paenibacillus</italic> y <italic>Sinomonas</italic>, inhiben el crecimiento micelial de <italic>E. turcicum</italic>, mediante la producción de compuestos difusibles y enzimas hidrolíticas (Sartori <italic>et al</italic>., 2020; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Chen <italic>et al.,</italic> 2022</xref>). Sin embargo, el efecto de los COV bacte- rianos sobre este fitopatógeno ha sido poco explorado.</p>
				<p>En este estudio se evidencia la capacidad de los COV de las cepas bacterianas (B3, B9, B15 y B95) en la inhibición del crecimiento micelial de <italic>E. turcicum</italic> y de protección de las hojas de maíz ante el ataque de este hongo, al reducir el área foliar afectada. La actividad antifúngica de estas cepas bacterianas fue previamente eva- luada contra <italic>Rhizoctonia zeae</italic>, registrando inhibiciones del crecimiento micelial entre 40% y 50%, mediante compuestos difusibles (Morales-Ruiz <italic>et al</italic>., 2022). Los mismos autores reportaron que la cepa B95 fue ineficiente para inhibir a <italic>R. zeae</italic>, lo que contrasta con los resultados de este estudio, puesto que esta cepa registró altos valores de inhibición por COV y compuestos difusibles (Datos no mostrados), contra todos los aislamientos de <italic>E. turcicum</italic>. Adicionalmente, los COV de la cepa B95, disminuyeron por arriba del 90%, el %AFA en hojas de maíz inoculadas con los aislamientos fúngicos. Sartori <italic>et al</italic>. (2020), reportaron inhibiciones del crecimiento micelial de <italic>E. tur- cicum</italic> por COV emitidos por cepas de <italic>Curtobacterium</italic>, <italic>Pantoea</italic> y <italic>Bacillus</italic>, siendo este último género el que mostró mayor inhibición del hongo. Entre los COV producidos por estas bacterias podemos mencionar <italic>2-</italic>Nonadecanona, indol, D-limone- no, 2-Tridecanon y<italic>,</italic> trisulfuro de dimetilo, cuya actividad antifúngica ya ha sido de- mostrada (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Wu <italic>et al</italic>., 2019</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Gao <italic>et al</italic>. (2017</xref>) reportaron inhibiciones de 83 y 91% en <italic>Alternaria alternata y</italic> en <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic>, respectivamente, mediante COV de <italic>B. velezensis cepa</italic> ZSY-1. Este efecto antifúngico lo atribuyeron a los COV; pira- zina, benzotiazol, fenol y 1,1-dimetiletil<italic>.</italic> Las inhibiciones del crecimiento micelial en los aislados de <italic>E. turcicum</italic> por COV de <italic>B. velezensis</italic> cepa B15, son similares a los valores reportados por Gao <italic>et al.</italic> (2017).</p>
				<p>Especies de <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> como <italic>P. aureaginosa</italic> y <italic>P. fluorescens</italic> producen COV como <italic>2,</italic>5<italic>-</italic>Dimetil<italic>-</italic>3(2H)-furanona, silanediol, 2,4,4<italic>-</italic>Trimetil<italic>-</italic>1<italic>-</italic>penteno<italic>,</italic> HCN, el disulfuro de dimetilo (DMDS), trisulfuro de dimetilo (DMTS), con actividad an- tifúngica demostrada contra <italic>Botryosphaeria rhodina</italic>, <italic>R. solani</italic>, <italic>Pythium aphani- dermatum</italic>, <italic>Penicillium italicum,</italic> entre otros (Michelsen y Stougaard, 2012; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Wang <italic>et al.,</italic> 2020</xref>: Morales <italic>et al</italic>., 2023)<italic>.</italic> Las variaciones en cuanto a los porcentajes de inhibición (4 y 80%) reportados por estos autores para <italic>P. aureaginosa</italic> y <italic>P. fluores- cens</italic>, las atribuyeron a las cepas bacteriana (antagonista) y fúngica (patógeno). Los valores de inhibición en aislados de <italic>E. turcicum</italic> por <italic>P. aureaginosa</italic> B95 fueron altos, especialmente contra el aislado Moc2-1 al inhibirlo en 98%. Este valor es superior a los documentados por los autores arriba descritos.</p>
				<p>El uso de miembros del género <italic>Staphyloccocus</italic> como agente de control biológi- co, no es frecuente. Sin embargo, se han identificado algunas especies, que produ- cen COV con actividad antifúngica. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Alijani <italic>et al.</italic> (2019</xref>), documentaron un 34.52% de inhibición del crecimiento micelial y 82.81% de inhibición en la germinación de conidios de <italic>Colletotrichum nymphaeae</italic> por el efecto de los COV emitidos por <italic>Sta- phylococcus sciuri</italic>. El óxido de mesitil, ácido acético, tolueno, o-xileno, 4-metilde- cano y 2-metilpropil éster, fueron los COV más comunes producidos por S. <italic>sciuri</italic>, todos ellos con actividad antimicrobiana corroborada (Nakkeeran <italic>et al.</italic> 2020).</p>
				<p>Los valores de inhibición de las cepas B2 (<italic>S. warneri</italic>) y B9 (<italic>S. saccharolyticus</italic>) en este estudio, son distintos a los reportados por <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Alijani <italic>et al</italic>. (2019</xref>). La cepa B9 inhibió en mayor medida a los aislamientos Bac7-2 y Moc2-1, mientras que la cepa B2 solo inhibió al aislado Bac7-2 en un 26.13%. El reducido %AFA observado en las hojas de maíz inoculadas con los aislados de <italic>E. turcicum</italic> y luego expuestas a los COV de la cepa B9, podría deberse a una inhibición de la germinación de los conidios de <italic>E. turcicum</italic>, puesto que éstos se utilizaron como inóculo para infectar las hojas de maíz.</p>
				<p>El HCN es un COV con efecto antifúngico, que interfiere con la respiración celular, al inhibir al citocromo oxidasa. Es producido por rizobacterias, especial- mente por <italic>Pseudomonas</italic>, aunque también se han reportado cepas cianogénicas de <italic>Aeromonas</italic>, <italic>Chromobacterium</italic>, <italic>Burkholderia</italic> y <italic>Bacillus</italic> (Sehrawat <italic>et al.,</italic> 2022)<italic>.</italic> Las especies antifúngicas <italic>P. aeruginosa, P. fluorescens</italic>, <italic>P. chlororaphis, P. putida</italic>, <italic>B. cereus</italic>, <italic>B. subtilis</italic>, <italic>B. paramycoides</italic> y <italic>B. aryabhattai</italic>, han sido reportadas como productoras de HCN (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Anand <italic>et al</italic>., 2020</xref>; Shastri <italic>et al</italic>., 2020; Sehrawat <italic>et al.,</italic> 2022; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Riera <italic>et al</italic>., 2023</xref>). Basado en la capacidad de las cepas B95 y B3 para producir HCN, podría sugerirse que su efecto antagónico es atribuible a este COV, especial- mente en la cepa B95. Sin embargo, es posible que otros COV estén involucrados. Por otra parte, el efecto antifúngico de las cepas B9 y B15 es ocasionado por COV distintos al HCN, como los reportados por <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Alijani <italic>et al</italic>. (2019</xref>) para <italic>Staphyloccocus</italic> (óxido de mesitil, ácido acético, tolueno, o-xileno, 4-metildecano, 2-metilpropil éster), o los reportados por Sartori <italic>et al</italic>. (2020) para <italic>Bacillus</italic> (<italic>2-</italic>Nonadecanona, in- dol, D-limoneno, 2-Tridecanon y<italic>,</italic> trisulfuro de dimetilo). Sin embargo, no se puede descartar la participación de COV no identificados previamente.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec sec-type="conclusions">
				<title>Conclusiones</title>
				<p>Los aislamientos fúngicos recuperados de hojas de maíz con síntomas de tizón foliar fueron identificados como <italic>E. turcicum</italic>, y se corroboró su patogenicidad. El crecimiento micelial y capacidad infectiva de <italic>E. turcicum</italic> se vieron afectados por los COV emitidos por las rizobacterias evaluadas. Las cepas B3 (<italic>Bacillus arya- bhattai</italic>), B15 (<italic>Bacillus velezensis</italic>) y B95 (<italic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic>), fueron las más eficientes en la inhibición del crecimiento micelial de los aislamientos fúngi- cos y en la reducción del %AFA. La cepa B95 tiene un mayor potencial como agen- te de biocontrol contra <italic>E. turcicum,</italic> y es necesario continuar su estudio en ensayos <italic>in planta</italic>, para corroborar su efectividad. El HCN producido por las cepas B3 y B95 puede estar implicado en el efecto antifúngico que ejercen sobre <italic>E. turcicum</italic>. Las cepas B9 y B15 no produjeron HCN, sugiriendo que el antagonismo contra <italic>E. turcicum</italic> podía deberse a otros COV antifúngicos. Es necesario estudiar el perfil de volátiles de las cuatro cepas bacterianas y su efecto individual y conjunto (en mezclas) sobre <italic>E. turcicum</italic>, con el fin de explorar un posible efecto sinérgico entre COV y entre cepas bacterianas.</p>
			</sec>
		</body>
		<back>
			<ack>
				<title>Agradecimientos</title>
				<p> </p>
				<p> </p>
				<p>Los autores agradecen a la Dirección General de Educación Superior Universitaria e Intercultural (<italic>DGESUI</italic>), por el financiamiento de este proyecto, a través de la convocatoria de Apoyo a la Incorpo- ración de NPTC (Proyecto UDO-PTC-071). IAMM reconoce al Consejo Nacional de Humanidades Ciencias y Tecnologías (CONAHCYT) por la beca de maestría otorgada. Todos los autores agradecen al Dr. Ignacio Maldonado Mendoza y al Dr. Damián Cordero Ramírez por proporcionar amablemente las cepas bacterianas evaluadas en este estudio<bold>.</bold></p>
			</ack>
		</back>
	</sub-article>
</article>