<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article
  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.1" specific-use="sps-1.9" xml:lang="en" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
	<front>
		<journal-meta>
			<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">rmfi</journal-id>
			<journal-title-group>
				<journal-title>Revista mexicana de fitopatología</journal-title>
				<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">Rev. mex. fitopatol</abbrev-journal-title>
			</journal-title-group>
			<issn pub-type="ppub">0185-3309</issn>
			<issn pub-type="epub">2007-8080</issn>
			<publisher>
				<publisher-name>Sociedad Mexicana de Fitopatología A.C.</publisher-name>
			</publisher>
		</journal-meta>
		<article-meta>
			<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18781/R.MEX.FIT.2024-28</article-id>
			<article-categories>
				<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
					<subject>Scientific Article</subject>
				</subj-group>
			</article-categories>
			<title-group>
				<article-title>Control <italic>in vitro</italic> of <italic>Neopestalotiopsis</italic> sp. isolated from strawberry by <italic>Trichoderma</italic> and commercial fungicides</article-title>
			</title-group>
			<contrib-group>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Olivares-Rodriguez</surname>
						<given-names>Gabriela</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Angeles-Núñez</surname>
						<given-names>Juan Gabriel</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Mondragón-Rojas</surname>
						<given-names>Francisco</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Rivas-Valencia</surname>
						<given-names>Patricia</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Zárate-Castrejón</surname>
						<given-names>José Luis</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Mariscal-Amaro</surname>
						<given-names>Luis Antonio</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6"><sup>6</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Díaz-Espino</surname>
						<given-names>Luis Febronio</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff7"><sup>7</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Martínez-Martínez</surname>
						<given-names>Talina Olivia</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff8"><sup>8</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
			</contrib-group>
			<aff id="aff1">
				<label>1</label>
				<institution content-type="original">Universidad Politécnica de Guanajuato. Ingeniería Agroindustrial. Avenida Universidad Sur # 1001, Comunidad Juan Alonso. C.P. 38496. Cortázar, Guanajuato, México</institution>
				<institution content-type="normalized">Universidad Politécnica de Guanajuato</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Universidad Politécnica de Guanajuato</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<state>Guanajuato</state>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="MX">Mexico</country>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff2">
				<label>2</label>
				<institution content-type="original">Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP), Campo Experimental Bajío. Carretera San Miguel de Allende-Celaya, km. 6.5. C.P. 38110. Celaya, Guanajuato, México</institution>
				<institution content-type="normalized">Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP)</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP)</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<state>Guanajuato</state>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="MX">Mexico</country>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff3">
				<label>3</label>
				<institution content-type="original">Universidad Politécnica de Guanajuato. Ingeniería Agroindustrial. Avenida Universidad Sur # 1001, Comunidad Juan Alonso. C.P. 38496. Cortázar, Guanajuato, México</institution>
				<institution content-type="normalized">Universidad Politécnica de Guanajuato</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Universidad Politécnica de Guanajuato</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<state>Guanajuato</state>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="MX">Mexico</country>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff4">
				<label>4</label>
				<institution content-type="original">INIFAP, Campo Experimental Valle de México. Carretera Los Reyes-Texcoco, km 13.5, C.P. 56120. Coatlinchan, Texcoco, México.</institution>
				<institution content-type="normalized">INIFAP</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgname">INIFAP</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<city>Texcoco</city>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="MX">Mexico</country>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff5">
				<label>5</label>
				<institution content-type="original">Universidad de Guanajuato, Campus Celaya-Salvatierra, Departamento de Ingeniería Agroindustrial, Prolongación Río Lerma s/n, Col. Suiza. C.P. 38060. Celaya, Guanajuato, México</institution>
				<institution content-type="normalized">Universidad de Guanajuato</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Universidad de Guanajuato</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<state>Guanajuato</state>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="MX">Mexico</country>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff6">
				<label>6</label>
				<institution content-type="original">Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP), Campo Experimental Bajío. Carretera San Miguel de Allende-Celaya, km. 6.5. C.P. 38110. Celaya, Guanajuato, México</institution>
				<institution content-type="normalized">Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP)</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP)</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<state>Guanajuato</state>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="MX">Mexico</country>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff7">
				<label>7</label>
				<institution content-type="original">Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP), Campo Experimental Bajío. Carretera San Miguel de Allende-Celaya, km. 6.5. C.P. 38110. Celaya, Guanajuato, México</institution>
				<institution content-type="normalized">Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP)</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP)</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<state>Guanajuato</state>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="MX">Mexico</country>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff8">
				<label>8</label>
				<institution content-type="original">Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP), Campo Experimental Bajío. Carretera San Miguel de Allende-Celaya, km. 6.5. C.P. 38110. Celaya, Guanajuato, México</institution>
				<institution content-type="normalized">Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP)</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP)</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<state>Guanajuato</state>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="MX">Mexico</country>
			</aff>
			<pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic">
				<day>31</day>
				<month>12</month>
				<year>2024</year>
			</pub-date>
			<pub-date date-type="collection" publication-format="electronic">
				<year>2024</year>
			</pub-date>
			<volume>42</volume>
			<issue>4</issue>
			<elocation-id>RMEXFIT202428</elocation-id>
			<history>
				<date date-type="received">
					<day>10</day>
					<month>07</month>
					<year>2024</year>
				</date>
				<date date-type="accepted">
					<day>23</day>
					<month>12</month>
					<year>2024</year>
				</date>
			</history>
			<permissions>
				<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/" xml:lang="en">
					<license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License</license-p>
				</license>
			</permissions>
			<abstract>
				<title>ABSTRACT</title>
				<p> </p>
				<p>
					<inline-graphic xlink:href="2007-8080-rmfi-42-04-RMEXFIT202428-i001.gif"/>Background/Objective. The fungi <italic>Neopestalotiopsis</italic> sp. is an emerging pathogen that can cause losses of more than 70 % of production in strawberry crops. Due to this situation, is necessary to evaluate and implement control methods with low ecological impact. The objective of this work was evaluated the inhibitory growth of <italic>Neopestalotiopsis</italic> sp. using antagonist strains of <italic>Trichoderma</italic> sp. and fungicides used locally in the Bajio of Guanajuato, México.</p>
				<sec>
					<title>Materials and Methods. </title>
					<p>The pathogen was isolated in strawberry symptomatic plants. The morphological and pathogenicity characterization of the isolate was carried out. The <italic>Trichoderma</italic> strains were obtained from the biological collection of the National Forestry, Agricultural and Livestock Institute (INIFAP), Bajio Experimental Field (CEBAJ), and were confront in dual cultures with the pathogen, the percentage of radial growth inhibition (PRGI) was calculated at 120 h. In addition, five commercial fungicides were added to the growth medium and was calculated the growth diameter of the fungus.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<title>Results. </title>
					<p>The PRGI by <italic>Trichoderma</italic> were observed in a range of 63 to 70 %. The mechanisms of parasitism for <italic>Trichoderma</italic> were curling, adhesion and lysis to the pathogen hypha. The T1 strain was the greatest potential for controlling the pathogen, followed by T5 and T7. Three fungicides, Tecobenazole (100 mL 100 L<sup>-1</sup>), Cinnamon and Neem extract (500 mL 100 L<sup>-1</sup>), and Peracetic Acid (25 mL 100 L<sup>-1</sup>) had 100 % inhibited of fungal growth.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<title>Conclusion. </title>
					<p>These results contribute to the knowledge on the control of <italic>Neopestalotiopsi</italic>s sp. with the application of <italic>Trichoderma</italic> and the authorized products in Mexico</p>
				</sec>
			</abstract>
			<kwd-group xml:lang="en">
				<title>Keywords:</title>
				<kwd>Growth inhibition</kwd>
				<kwd>beneficial microorganisms</kwd>
				<kwd>pathogens strawberry</kwd>
				<kwd>Cinnamon-Neem Extract</kwd>
				<kwd>Peracetic Acid</kwd>
			</kwd-group>
			<counts>
				<fig-count count="14"/>
				<table-count count="6"/>
				<equation-count count="0"/>
				<ref-count count="27"/>
				<page-count count="0"/>
			</counts>
		</article-meta>
	</front>
	<body>
		<sec sec-type="intro">
			<title>Introduction</title>
			<p>The strawberry crop (<italic>Fragaria x ananasa</italic>) is of great importance to Mexico, which currently is third in terms of amount of strawberry produced in the world, with a production value of over 15,400 million pesos (SIAP, 2024). Nevertheless, there are pathogens that can reduce production and cause economic losses such as the wilting disease, caused by species of the genus <italic>Neopestalotiopsis</italic>, one of which was recently introduced and can result in production losses of over 70 %. Symptomatology includes rotting of the root, crown and foliar spots (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Rebollar-Alviter <italic>et al.</italic>, 2020</xref>), and fruits can present lesions of approximately 2-4 mm that extend to the point where they cause rotting and mummification (Goldenhar and Pate, 2021). Due to the shortness of information on the pathogen, control strategies on the field have been studied, such as cultural practices and chemical and biological control (Rebollar-Alviter <italic>et al.,</italic> 2020). It has been pointed out that for the control of this pathogen, antagonistic agents can be used of the genera <italic>Trichoderma, Bacillus</italic> and <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Zhang <italic>et al</italic>., 2024</xref><italic>;</italic><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Amrutha and Vijayaraghavan, 2018</xref>). In particular, the antagonistic effect of <italic>Trichoderma</italic> is due to the action of enzymes, which can degrade the cell wall, chitin, proteins and lipids (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Pandey <italic>et al.</italic> 2022</xref>). In addition, it produces secondary metabolites such as polyketides, non- ribosomal peptides, pyrones, antibiotic and others, which function as growth inhibitors, and can also act as a mycoparasite, and compete for space and nutrients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Mukherjee <italic>et al</italic>., 2012</xref>). In the case of control with agrochemicals, although there are products authorized for use on strawberry (COFEPRIS, 2024), whether as a synthetic molecule or plant extracts, the information on the control of <italic>Neopestalotiopsis</italic> is not precise. In this sense, the goal of this work was to evaluate the inhibiting effect of <italic>Trichoderma</italic> sp. strains on the growth of this <italic>Neopestalotiopsis</italic> sp. strain isolated from strawberry and the control with commercial fungicides used in some parts of the Guanajuato Bajio. The information generated displays the importance of the use of <italic>Trichoderma</italic> and commercial fungicides effective in the reduction of growth of this pathogen on the production of strawberry.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="materials|methods">
			<title>Materials and Methods</title>
			<sec>
				<title><bold>Reactivation of the <italic>Trichoderma</italic> sp. strains</bold></title>
				<p>The <italic>Trichoderma</italic> sp. strains were provided by the Agricultural Microbiology Laboratory of the Transformation Area of the Bajio Experimental Field (CEBAJ) of the National Forestry, Agricultural and Livestock Institute (INIFAP) and previously isolated from different substrates and places in Mexico (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>). The reactivation was performed in Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) at 26±2 °C.</p>
				<p>
					<table-wrap id="t1">
						<label>Table 1</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Identification data, isolation substrate and origin of the <italic>Trichoderma</italic> sp. strains used in the biological control of</title>
						</caption>
						<table border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" style="border-collapse: collapse; width: 100%; text-align: center;">
							<thead>
								<tr>
									<th>Identification of strains</th>
									<th>Substratum</th>
									<th>Origin </th>
								</tr>
							</thead>
							<tbody>
								<tr>
									<td>8L9</td>
									<td>Leachate</td>
									<td>Talea de Castro, Oaxaca, México</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>1752</td>
									<td>Agricultural soil</td>
									<td>Santiago Coltzingo, Puebla, México</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>1S1</td>
									<td>Compost</td>
									<td>Palma Sola, Veracruz</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>THP</td>
									<td>Agricultural soil</td>
									<td>San José de Pantoja, Valle de Santiago, Guanajuato, México</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>675, T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, T6, T7</td>
									<td>Agricultural soil, banana growing soils</td>
									<td>Piedra Parada, Veracruz</td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>
					</table-wrap>
				</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>Isolation of Neopestalotiopsis sp. in strawberry and morphological characterization</title>
				<p>In July, 2022, <italic>Neopestalotiopsis</italic> sp. was isolated from symptomatic strawberry plants, var. San Andres, from the CEBAJ orchard greenhouse. Leaves, fruits and stems were gathered and placed in plastic bags for transportation to the laboratory. Pieces of tissue measuring approximately 1 cm<sup>2</sup> were cut and disinfected with NaClO 5 % for 60 seconds. They were washed three times with sterile water and the plant material was left to dry on a sterile paper towel. They were later planted in discardable Petri dishes containing PDA and amoxicillin (30 mg 1000 µL<sup>-1</sup>) and incubated at 26±2 °C. Once the pathogen sporulated, an acervulus was taken using a dissection needle and suspended in 1000 µL of sterile water. Later, the solution was homogenized in a vortex and 100 µL were taken for plating by spread technique. The incubation was carried out at 26±2 °C for 24 h. After this time and under a stereoscopic microscope, germinated conidia were placed in a PDA medium to obtain monosporic cultures, which were incubated at 26±2 °C. The morphological characterization of <italic>Neopestalotiopsis</italic> sp. was performed based on the description at a genus level with the characteristics described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Maharachchikumbura <italic>et al</italic>. (2012</xref>) and Maharachchikumbura <italic>et al</italic>. (2014).</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>Pathogenicity tests</title>
				<p>To verify the pathogenicity of the isolation, the fungus was planted and left to grow for five days. Using a hole puncher, five discs, 5 mm in diameter, were taken from the invaded medium and placed on the crown of the strawberry. This procedure was carried out in 15 pots with healthy strawberry plants of the San Andres variety. Additionally, two discs were placed on leaves and stem to verify the pathogenicity of the fungus. The plants were watered every 48 h and covered with a polyethylene bag to reach a relative humidity</p>
				<p>&gt; 90 %. The symptomatology that arose after inoculation was observed (ai).</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title><bold>Antagonistic activity of <italic>Trichoderma</italic> on <italic>Neopestalotiopsis</italic> sp.</bold></title>
				<p>To determine the antagonistic activity, the dual culture method described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Correa <italic>et al</italic>. (2007</xref>) was used, which indicates a pathogen disc and another of the antagonistic fungus on opposite sides, 1 cm from the edge of the Petri dish (90 x 15 mm). The test was performed with eight repetitions in an antibiotic-free PDA medium. Discs measuring 5 mm in diameter were used, containing mycelium from the pathogen and strains of <italic>Trichoderma</italic> sp. previously grown on PDA for five days. The pathogen was given a growth advantage of three days. The incubation was carried out at 26±2 °C. The radial growth of the pathogen was measured every eight hours until 120 h. The percentage of radial growth inhibition (PRGI) was obtained from the growth of each pathogen in the dual culture, along with their respective controls, using the formula used by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Suárez <italic>et al</italic>. (2008</xref>):</p>
				<p>where PRGI=percentage of radial growth inhibition; R1= radial growth (mm) of the pathogen without Trichoderma, R2= radial growth (mm) of the pathogen with Trichoderma.</p>
				<p>Additionally, the antagonistic ability of the chosen isolates selected was evaluated according to the scale by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bell et al. (1982</xref>), where Class 1: the antagonistic agent completely colonizes the phytopathogen and completely covers the surface of the medium; Class 2: the antagonistic agent colonizes two thirds of the culture medium, limiting the growth of the phytopathogen; Class 3: the antagonistic agent and the pathogen each colonize half of the surface, with the growth of each one being similar; Class 4: the phytopathogen colonizes two thirds of the surface of the culture medium and limits the growth of the antagonistic agent; Class 5: the phytopathogen completely colonizes the culture medium and grows on the antagonistic agent. The PRGI was analyzed with an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a totally randomized design. The means comparison was performed using Tukey’s test (p&lt; 0.05). The data were analyzed using the R Program, version 4.4.0.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>Mycoparasitism</title>
				<p>The presence of parasitism of the Trichoderma strains towards Neopestalotiopsis was observed to the dual microculture technique was used. In the trials, 15 Trichoderma strains were evaluated, in opposition to the pathogen Neopestalotiopsisis and three repetitions were carried out. The microcultures were prepared on slides on which a layer of medium (16 g bacteriological agar + 10 g PDA for 1 L), free of antibiotics, was applied. For the confrontations, discs 5 mm in diameter of the pathogen’s mycelium and Trichoderma previously grown on PDA for five days were used. On one end of the slide was a pathogen disc with a difference of 24 h, since the growth of the pathogen displayed a slower growth in comparison with Trichoderma. In the equidistant end, a disc of Trichoderma was placed. The preparations were incubated at 26±2 °C. When both fungi came into contact (approximately 24 h), the slide was removed from the Petri dish and using transparent scotch tape, a sample of mycelium was taken and a drop of cotton blue was added to be able to observe under the microscope and determine the type of parasitism of the Trichoderma strains.</p>
				<p><italic>Growth inhibition test Neopestalotiopsis with commercial fungicides</italic></p>
				<p>The effect of inhibition of the growth of pathogens was determined in five commercial products: the contact fungicide Captan (Captan 50®), the systemic fungicide Tebuconazole (Folicur®), the systemic fungicide Carbendazim (Agrosys®), the Cinnamon and Neem Extract (Nymeria®), peracetic acid (Microclean®) and a citrus- based organic fungicide for sale locally<bold>.</bold> Each fungicide was evaluated in three concentration (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>), which were chosen considering the recommendations by the manufacturer in the technical details; a minimal concentration was used, along with an intermediate one and the highest one recommended. Five repetitions were carried out for every concentration plus one control. The tests were carried out in Petri dishes with PDA free of antibiotics. The fungicides were incorporated into the medium when it reached a temperature of 45-50 °C. At the center of each dish, a 5 mm disc of the Neopestalotiopsis growth, previously grown for 5 days in PDA medium was placed. Every 8 h, the diameter of growth was determined for 120 h. The control was established in PDA without fungicide. The tests were carried out in five repetitions. For the statistical analysis, the data were arranged in a totally randomized design. These data were analyzed in an ANOVA using the R program, version 4.4.0. The multiple means comparison was carried out using Tukey’s method (p≤0.05).</p>
				<p>
					<table-wrap id="t2">
						<label>Table 2</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Fungicides evaluated in Neopestalotiopsis sp. growth inhibition.</title>
						</caption>
						<table border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" style="border-collapse: collapse; width: 100%; text-align: center;">
							<thead>
								<tr>
									<th>Fungicide</th>
									<th>Dosis (L<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
								</tr>
							</thead>
							<tbody>
								<tr>
									<td>Captan</td>
									<td>2 g (A), 3 g (B), 4 g (C)</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Tebuconazol</td>
									<td>1 mL (D), 2.5 mL (E), 3.75 mL (F)</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Carbendazim</td>
									<td>4 mL (G), 5 mL (H), 6 mL (I)</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Cinnamon and Neem Extract </td>
									<td>5 mL (J), 10 mL (K), 15 mL (L)</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Peracetic acid</td>
									<td>0.25 mL (M), 0.50 mL (N), 0.75 mL (O)</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Citrus-based organic fungicide</td>
									<td>5 mL (P), 7.5 mL (Q), 10 mL (R)</td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>
						<table-wrap-foot>
							<fn id="TFN1">
								<p>Note: Letters in parentheses will be used to refer to the treatment applied.</p>
							</fn>
						</table-wrap-foot>
					</table-wrap>
				</p>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="results|discussion">
			<title>Results and Discussion</title>
			<sec>
				<title>Identification of symptoms in strawberry plants</title>
				<p>Symptoms were found in plants according to reports by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Rebollar-Alviter et al. (2020</xref>): blight in leaves, regressive death of sprouts, rotting and deformation of fruits, stunting of plants, as well as rotting of the root and crown (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">Figure 1</xref>). These symptoms are similar among Neopestalotiopsis species. In this regard, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Baggio et al. (2021</xref>) mention that the tissues most affected by N. rosae are those of the root and neck of the root, although there is a low incidence on fruits and leaves. Likewise, authors such as <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Obregón et al. (2018</xref>) indicated that N. clavispora shows symptoms on leaves, which consist of reddish necrotic interveinal areas that begin at the edges and progress as the tissue becomes senescent. According to the authors, the root and crown are also affected, ultimately leading to the death of the plant. The species N. clavispora causes blight on the calyx and the receptacle of strawberries (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Shi et al., 2022</xref>).</p>
				<p>
					<fig id="f1">
						<label>Figure 1</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Symptoms in strawberry plants infected by Neopestaloptiosis sp. A) Stunting of plants, B) Blight in leaves, C and D) Deformation in mature and immature fruits.</title>
						</caption>
						<graphic xlink:href="2007-8080-rmfi-42-04-RMEXFIT202428-gf1.gif"/>
					</fig>
				</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>Identifying the causal agent</title>
				<p>After growing for eight days, the colonies in PDA medium presented a cottonlike structure, a white mycelium which slowly turned to a salmon color and concentric edges. When the culture was six days old, black spore masses formed (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">Figure 2</xref>). After 12 days, black globose acervuli were produced on the growth medium and on the tissues the stromata presented an irregular shape (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">Figure 2</xref>). The conidia presented three dark central cells and two basal hyalines with three apical appendices (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">Figure 2</xref>). The morphology of the pathogen coincided with the characteristics of the genus described by Maharachchikumbura et al. (2014). However, according to some characteristics pointed out by Maharachchikumbura et al. (2012), the Neopestaloptiopsis isolate in this study could be from N. rosae, a species that was confirmed to be present in strawberry crops in Mexico (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Rebollar-Alviter et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
				<p>
					<fig id="f2">
						<label>Figure 2</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Growth of Neopestalotiopsis sp. in a PDA medium after two weeks of inoculation. A) Development of colonies in a culture medium with black acervuli, B and C) Fungal conidia.</title>
						</caption>
						<graphic xlink:href="2007-8080-rmfi-42-04-RMEXFIT202428-gf2.gif"/>
					</fig>
				</p>
				<p><italic>Patogenicity of Neopestaloptiosis sp.</italic></p>
				<p>The plants inoculated with the isolate presented symptoms 24 h ai (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">Figure 3</xref>) in which small, maroon spots sized 2 mm were initially observed. After 56 h ai, leaf blight was observed, along with stem necrosis and weakening of the plant (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">Figure 3</xref>). On the 168th hour after inoculation, the damage was highly advanced, approximately 70 % of the stem presented necrosis and total softening. The spots present in the leaves covered over 80 % of the foliar surface (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">Figure 3</xref>). The symptomatology coincided with the one documented by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Rebollar Alviter et al. (2020</xref>) and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Gilardi et al. (2019</xref>) in strawberry crops, both in leaves and fruits.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>Antagonistic activity of Trichoderma on Neopestalotiopsis</title>
				<p>The statistical analysis indicated significant differences (p &lt; 0.05) in the growth inhibition between the evaluated strains. According to the means comparison, three inhibition groups were found, strain T1 displayed the greatest PRGI (70 %), while strains T675, T2 and T10 displayed the least inhibition (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">Figure 4</xref>). In general, the PRGI remained between 60 and 70 %, so the strains can be considered to have the potential to control the pathogen. Regarding this, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Yao et al. (2023</xref>), after an analysis of different studies, indicate that a strain of Trichoderma can be considered to have the potential in the effective control of the disease when growth inhibition surpasses 50 %.</p>
				<p>
					<fig id="f3">
						<label>Figure 3</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Symptoms on strawberry plants caused by Neopestalotiopsis sp. A) Blight on leaves, B) Necrosis on the stem and C) Necrosis in neck and leaves.</title>
						</caption>
						<graphic xlink:href="2007-8080-rmfi-42-04-RMEXFIT202428-gf3.gif"/>
					</fig>
				</p>
				<p>Some authors have evaluated the effect of Trichoderma for the control of Neopestalotiopsis. One of the first studies was the one by Mora-Morales et al. (2020), who evaluated the antagonistic in vitro effect of T. harzianum on Pestalotiopsis (Neopestalotiopsis sp.), and their results showed a PRGI of 71.11 %. Other authors such as <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Amrutha and Vijayaraghavan (2018</xref>) evaluated the antagonistic effect of T. asperellum against Neopestalotiopsis clavispora isolated from strawberry, and determined an average inhibition of 66 % in the growth of the pathogen in in vitro tests, as well as a reduction of 74 % of the disease. The authors indicated that, in order to manage the disease with biological and chemical products, it is necessary to consider the agroclimatic conditions for a greater efficiency in the control. In another study carried out by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Liu et al. (2024</xref>), in which they evaluated the antagonistic effect of volatile metabolites and fermentation metabolites produced by T. asperellum on the growth of N. clavispora, they determined inhibitions of 79.67 and 69.84 %, respectively. They also identified that the antagonistic effect was due to the competition for the substrate, the production of antimycotics and parasitism. Additionally, they indicated that the use of T. asperellum promoted the growth in the strawberry plant, its height, the root length, the total fresh weight, the root weight, the fresh weight of the stem and the dry weight of the root. On the other hand, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Pandey et al. (2022</xref>) determined that T. reesei influenced the in vitro growth of Pseudopestalotiopsis theae. Their results displayed an inhibition of 81.2 %. When they took the experiment to plants in greenhouse conditions, the severity of the disease was between 67.5 and 75 %. In this sense, the authors indicated that T. reesei was able to produce volatile and non- volatile metabolites with an inhibiting effect. In addition, in plants inoculated with the antagonist, they found an accumulation of defense enzymes such as polyphenol oxidase, peroxidase, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, β-1, 3-glucanase, and chitinase. Likewise, at 45 days, these plants displayed an increase in height, stem diameter, and the weight of shoots and roots.<inline-graphic xlink:href="2007-8080-rmfi-42-04-RMEXFIT202428-i007.gif"/>
					<inline-graphic xlink:href="2007-8080-rmfi-42-04-RMEXFIT202428-i008.gif"/>
					<inline-graphic xlink:href="2007-8080-rmfi-42-04-RMEXFIT202428-i009.gif"/>
					<inline-graphic xlink:href="2007-8080-rmfi-42-04-RMEXFIT202428-i010.gif"/>
					<inline-graphic xlink:href="2007-8080-rmfi-42-04-RMEXFIT202428-i011.gif"/>
					<inline-graphic xlink:href="2007-8080-rmfi-42-04-RMEXFIT202428-i012.gif"/>
				</p>
				<p>
					<fig id="f4">
						<label>Figure 4</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Percentage of inhibition of root growth for Neopestalotiopsis sp. obtained from the confrontation with Trichoderma strains (p≤0.05).</title>
						</caption>
						<graphic xlink:href="2007-8080-rmfi-42-04-RMEXFIT202428-gf4.gif"/>
					</fig>
				</p>
				<p><italic>Antagonism of the Trichoderma strains</italic></p>
				<p>According to the scale by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bell et al. (1982</xref>), antagonism levels II and III were found (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">Figure 5</xref>), i.e., in type II, the Trichoderma strains colonized two thirds of the culture medium, limiting the growth of the phytopathogen; in type III, Trichoderma and the pathogen each colonized half of the surface; growth was similar among strains (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>). Diverse authors have indicated that Trichoderma has different antagonism mechanisms, highlighting mycoparasitism, competition over space and food and antibiosis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Álvarez et al., 2022</xref>). One of the main mechanisms is mycoparasitism, in which structures may take the shapes of hooks, curl or an appressorium around the host, allowing it to penetrate into the pathogen and degrade it (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Mukherjee et al., 2022</xref>; Álvarez et al., 2022). This mechanism comes with the secretion of enzymes such as chitin to degrade the cell wall of the pathogen (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Yao et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Companioni-González et al., 2019</xref>).</p>
				<p>This study found the mycoparasitism mechanisms: adhesion and curling of the Trichoderma strains to the hypha of the pathogen, as well as the hyphal lysis, the formation of hooks and penetration of the antagonist into the pathogen (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">Figure 6</xref>).</p>
				<p>
					<fig id="f5">
						<label>Figure 5</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Confrontations of Trichoderma strains against Neopestalotiopsis sp. where T = Trichoderma and P = pathogen. The number found on the top right corner corresponds to the identification of the Trichoderma strain. T1, T5 and T7 are observed to maintain a level II antagonism, while T4, T8 and T10 maintain a level III.</title>
						</caption>
						<graphic xlink:href="2007-8080-rmfi-42-04-RMEXFIT202428-gf5.gif"/>
					</fig>
				</p>
				<p>
					<fig id="f6">
						<label>Figure 6</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Mechanisms of parasitism in Trichoderma sp against Neopestaloptiopsis sp. A) Curling, B) Formation of hooks and C) Adhesion and lysis.</title>
						</caption>
						<graphic xlink:href="2007-8080-rmfi-42-04-RMEXFIT202428-gf6.gif"/>
					</fig>
				</p>
				<p>
					<table-wrap id="t3">
						<label>Table 3</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Level of antagonism according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bell et al. (1982</xref>) and mycoparasitim mechanisms.</title>
						</caption>
						<table border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" style="border-collapse: collapse; width: 100%; text-align: center;">
							<thead>
								<tr>
									<th>Nivel de antagonismo</th>
									<th>Cepa</th>
									<th>Mecanismo del micoparasitismo</th>
								</tr>
							</thead>
							<tbody>
								<tr>
									<td>II</td>
									<td>1S1, T175, T675, T5</td>
									<td>Adhesion, curling</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>II</td>
									<td>8L9, T3</td>
									<td>Curling, formation of hooks </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>II</td>
									<td>THP</td>
									<td>Lysis, curling</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>II</td>
									<td>T1, T2</td>
									<td>Adhesion </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>II</td>
									<td>T3</td>
									<td>Curling, formation of hooks</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>II</td>
									<td>T6</td>
									<td>Adhesion, curling, formation of hooks</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>II</td>
									<td>T7</td>
									<td>Adhesion, penetration hyphal</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>III</td>
									<td>T4, T8</td>
									<td>Curling</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>III</td>
									<td>T9, T10</td>
									<td>Curling, formation of hooks</td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>
					</table-wrap>
				</p>
				<p><italic>Evaluation of control of Neopestalotiopsis sp. using commercial fungicides</italic></p>
				<p>According to the statistical analysis, significant differences were found between treatments. The means comparison indicated that the systemic fungicide Tebuconazole, the cinnamon and neem extract and peracetic acid, in all concentrations used, inhibited the growth of Neopestalotiopsis sp. by 100 % (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">Figure 7</xref>). Captan, the contact fungicide, inhibited the growth of the pathogen by 81, 83 and 86 %, followed by the citrus-based organic fungicide with 52, 60 and 63 %; and the systemic fungicide Carbendazim inhibited it by 28, 42 and 52 % in regard to the control.</p>
				<p>
					<fig id="f7">
						<label>Figure 7</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Growth of Neopestalotiopsis sp in a PDA medium with commercial fungicides. Test: control with no product; A-C: Captan 200, 300 and 400 g 100 L<sup>-1</sup>; D-F: Tebuconazole 100, 250 and 375 mL 100 L<sup>-1</sup>; G-I: Carbendazim 400, 500 and 600 mL 100 L<sup>-1</sup>; J-L: Extract of Cinnamon and Neem 500, 1000 and 1500 mL 100 L<sup>-1</sup>; M-O: Peracetic Acid 25, 50 and 75 mL 100 L<sup>-1</sup>; P-R: Citrus-based organic fungicide 500, 750 and 1000 mL 100 L<sup>-</sup> 1. 400 g and 600 mL 100 L<sup>-1</sup> (p≤0.05).</title>
						</caption>
						<graphic xlink:href="2007-8080-rmfi-42-04-RMEXFIT202428-gf7.gif"/>
					</fig>
				</p>
				<p>Due to the large economic losses caused by Neopestaloptiopsis, studies have been performed to determine the management of the disease. In this regard, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Rebollar-Alviter et al. (2020</xref>) evaluated the in vitro control of Neopestaloptiosis rosae using Captan and other products such as Azoxystrobin, Fluxapyroxad + Pyraclostrobin, Pyraclostrobin + Boscalid, Iprodion, Difenoconazole, Prochloraz, Cyprodinil + Fludioxonil. The results in terms of inhibition in the growth of the pathogens suggested that Captan, Fludioxonil + Cyprodinil, Difenoconazole and Iprodione had the greatest effect for the control of Neopestaloptiopsis. Likewise, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Baggio et al. (2023</xref>) held studies to determine the sensitivity of the pathogen to commercial fungicides, and their results indicated that Captan, Azoxystrobin, Fluxapyroxad + Pyraclostrobin, Pyraclostrobin + Boscalid, Iprodiona, Difenoconazole, Prochloraz, Cyprodinil + Fludioxonil.were more effective. Authors such as Acosta-González et al. (2024) pointed out that, when applying fungicide, particularly Pidiflumetofen + Fludioxonil, Ciprodinil + Fludioxonil and Procloraz preventively, they were able to reduce the incidence and severity of the disease, as well as the mortality of plants. The authors indicated that when the fungicides were applied preventively, they obtained an efficiency of 99 to 100 %, although when using them curatively, that is, after the symptoms were expressed, the efficiency was between 0 and 37 %.</p>
				<p>On the other hand, products based on the extracts of plants such as garlic, chamomile, rue, cinnamon, marigold, acacia, chili pepper, pepper, agave, rue, castor, prickly poppy, pine, citrus, creosote and others are authorized in Mexico as pesticides for strawberry crops (COFEPRIS, 2024). Therefore, they are an important alternative for the organic management of this crop. The results of this study with the extract of cinnamon and neem showed that they can be applied to inhibit the growth of the pathogen without causing long-term environmental harm. Other authors such as <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Darapanit et al. (2021</xref>) showed that ethanolic extracts based on turmeric (Curcuma longa), ginger (Zingiber officinale), lemongrass (Cymbopogon citratus), hibiscus (Hibiscus sabdariffa) and clove (Syzygium aromaticum) inhibited the growth of Neopestalotiopsis and Pseudopestalotiopsis strains, particularly the turmeric and clove extracts at concentrations of 10,000 mg L<sup>-1</sup>. In general, plant-based extracts produce secondary metabolites such as steroids, alkaloids, tannins, terpenes, phenols, flavonoids and resins, which exhibit antimicrobial properties (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Lengai et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="conclusions">
			<title>Conclusions</title>
			<p>The in vitro control obtained with the 15 Trichoderma strains evaluated was determined by the PRGI in an interval of 63 to 70 %. Strain T1 displayed the greatest percentage of inhibition in the radial growth of the pathogen. The level of antagonism found was types II and III, with parasitism mechanisms of curling, adhesion to the hypha of the pathogen and lysis. In the case of the pathogen growth control with the fungicides, an inhibition of 100 % was determined with Tebuconazole, Cinnamon Extract and Neem and Peracetic Acid. The active ingredients Captan and Carbendazim displayed a growth inhibition of 86 and 52 % with the doses 400 g and 600 mL 100 L<sup>-1</sup>, respectively. The results of this study serve as a reference for the development of an integrated management approach with preventive and control applications using Trichoderma sp. and organic products as an alternative to chemical molecules, which contributes towards the reduction of primary inoculum and provides protection to plants once established in the field.</p>
		</sec>
	</body>
	<back>
		<ref-list>
			<title>References</title>
			<ref id="B1">
				<mixed-citation> Acosta-González, U. Leyva-Mir, S.G. Silva-Rojas, H.V. Rebollar-Alviter, A. 2022 Preventive and Curative Effects of Treatments to Manage Strawberry Root and Crown Rot Caused by Neopestalotiopsis rosae Plant Disease 108 1278-1288 10.1094/PDIS-05-23-0958-RE </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Acosta-González</surname>
							<given-names>U.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Leyva-Mir</surname>
							<given-names>S.G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Silva-Rojas</surname>
							<given-names>H.V.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Rebollar-Alviter</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2022</year>
					<article-title>Preventive and Curative Effects of Treatments to Manage Strawberry Root and Crown Rot Caused by Neopestalotiopsis rosae</article-title>
					<source>Plant Disease</source>
					<volume>108</volume>
					<fpage>1278</fpage>
					<lpage>1288</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-05-23-0958-RE</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B2">
				<mixed-citation> Álvarez, P. Román, A. Tamayo, L. Guerra, L. Tuburcia, A. 2022 Efeito de Trichoderma harzianum e Trichoderma longibrachiaum no crescimento de Chionanthus pubescens, Eucalyptus cinerea e Cupressus macrocarpa em viveiro Revista Agraria Acadêmica 5 5 62-71 10.32406/v5n5/2022/62-71/agrariacad </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Álvarez</surname>
							<given-names>P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Román</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Tamayo</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Guerra</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Tuburcia</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2022</year>
					<article-title>Efeito de Trichoderma harzianum e Trichoderma longibrachiaum no crescimento de Chionanthus pubescens, Eucalyptus cinerea e Cupressus macrocarpa em viveiro</article-title>
					<source>Revista Agraria Acadêmica</source>
					<volume>5</volume>
					<issue>5</issue>
					<fpage>62</fpage>
					<lpage>71</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.32406/v5n5/2022/62-71/agrariacad</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B3">
				<mixed-citation> Amrutha, P. Vijayaraghavan, R. 2018 Evaluation of Fungicides and Biocontrol Agents against Neopestalotiopsis clavispora causing leaf blight of strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 7 8 622-628 10.20546/ijcmas.2018.708.067 </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Amrutha</surname>
							<given-names>P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Vijayaraghavan</surname>
							<given-names>R.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2018</year>
					<article-title>Evaluation of Fungicides and Biocontrol Agents against Neopestalotiopsis clavispora causing leaf blight of strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.)</article-title>
					<source>International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences</source>
					<volume>7</volume>
					<issue>8</issue>
					<fpage>622</fpage>
					<lpage>628</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.20546/ijcmas.2018.708.067</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B4">
				<mixed-citation> Baggio, J.S. Forcelini, B.B. Wang, N.Y. Ruschel, R.G. Mertely, J.C. Peres, N.A. 2021 Outbreak of leaf spot and fruit rot in Florida strawberry caused by Neopestalotiopsis spp. Plant Disease 105 2 305-315 10.1094/PDIS-06-20-1290-RE </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Baggio</surname>
							<given-names>J.S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Forcelini</surname>
							<given-names>B.B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>N.Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ruschel</surname>
							<given-names>R.G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mertely</surname>
							<given-names>J.C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Peres</surname>
							<given-names>N.A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2021</year>
					<article-title>Outbreak of leaf spot and fruit rot in Florida strawberry caused by Neopestalotiopsis spp.</article-title>
					<source>Plant Disease</source>
					<volume>105</volume>
					<issue>2</issue>
					<fpage>305</fpage>
					<lpage>315</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-06-20-1290-RE</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B5">
				<mixed-citation> Baggio, S.J. Rebello, S.C. de Morais, B.M. Marin, V.M. Gama, B.A. Forcelini, B.B. Mertely, C.J. Peres, A.N. 2023 Efficacy of Single- and Multi-Site Fungicides Against Neopestalotiopsis spp. of strawberry Plant Disease 107 7 10.1094/PDIS-08-22-1929-RE </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Baggio</surname>
							<given-names>S.J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Rebello</surname>
							<given-names>S.C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>de Morais</surname>
							<given-names>B.M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Marin</surname>
							<given-names>V.M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gama</surname>
							<given-names>B.A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Forcelini</surname>
							<given-names>B.B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mertely</surname>
							<given-names>C.J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Peres</surname>
							<given-names>A.N.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2023</year>
					<article-title>Efficacy of Single- and Multi-Site Fungicides Against Neopestalotiopsis spp. of strawberry</article-title>
					<source>Plant Disease</source>
					<volume>107</volume>
					<issue>7</issue>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-08-22-1929-RE</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B6">
				<mixed-citation> Bell, D. Well, H. Markham, C. 1982 In vitro antagonism of Trichoderma species against six fungal plant pathogens Phytopathology 72 379-382 10.1094/Phyto-72-379 </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Bell</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Well</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Markham</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1982</year>
					<article-title>In vitro antagonism of Trichoderma species against six fungal plant pathogens</article-title>
					<source>Phytopathology</source>
					<volume>72</volume>
					<fpage>379</fpage>
					<lpage>382</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/Phyto-72-379</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B7">
				<mixed-citation> COFEPRIS, Comisión Federal para la Protección contra Riesgos Sanitarios 2024 Consulta de Registros Sanitarios de Plaguicidas, Nutrientes Vegetales y LMR <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://siipris03.cofepris.gob.mx/Resoluciones/Consultas/ConWebRegPlaguicida.asp">https://siipris03.cofepris.gob.mx/Resoluciones/Consultas/ConWebRegPlaguicida.asp</ext-link> (consulta, enero 2024) </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="webpage">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<collab>COFEPRIS, Comisión Federal para la Protección contra Riesgos Sanitarios</collab>
					</person-group>
					<year>2024</year>
					<source>Consulta de Registros Sanitarios de Plaguicidas, Nutrientes Vegetales y LMR</source>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://siipris03.cofepris.gob.mx/Resoluciones/Consultas/ConWebRegPlaguicida.asp">https://siipris03.cofepris.gob.mx/Resoluciones/Consultas/ConWebRegPlaguicida.asp</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B8">
				<mixed-citation> Companioni-González, B. Domínguez-Arizmendi, G. García-Velasco, R. 2019 Trichoderma: su potencial en el desarrollo sostenible de la agricultura Biotecnología Vegetal 19 4 237-248 </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Companioni-González</surname>
							<given-names>B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Domínguez-Arizmendi</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>García-Velasco</surname>
							<given-names>R.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2019</year>
					<article-title>Trichoderma: su potencial en el desarrollo sostenible de la agricultura</article-title>
					<source>Biotecnología Vegetal</source>
					<volume>19</volume>
					<issue>4</issue>
					<fpage>237</fpage>
					<lpage>248</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B9">
				<mixed-citation> Correa, S. Mello, M. Ávila, Z. Minare, L. Pádua, R. Gomes, D. 2017 Cepas de Trichoderma spp. para el control biológico de Sclerotium rolfsii SAAC Fitosanidad 11 1 3-9 </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Correa</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mello</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ávila</surname>
							<given-names>Z.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Minare</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pádua</surname>
							<given-names>R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gomes</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2007</year>
					<article-title>Cepas de Trichoderma spp. para el control biológico de Sclerotium rolfsii SAAC</article-title>
					<source>Fitosanidad</source>
					<volume>11</volume>
					<issue>1</issue>
					<fpage>3</fpage>
					<lpage>9</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B10">
				<mixed-citation> Darapanit, A. Boonyuen, N. Leesutthiphonchai, W. Nuankaew, S. Piasai, O. 2021 Identification, pathogenicity and effects of plant extracts on Neopestalotiopsis and Pseudopestalotiopsis causing fruit diseases Scientific Reports 11 1 22606 10.1038/s41598-021-02113-5 </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Darapanit</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Boonyuen</surname>
							<given-names>N.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Leesutthiphonchai</surname>
							<given-names>W.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Nuankaew</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Piasai</surname>
							<given-names>O.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2021</year>
					<article-title>Identification, pathogenicity and effects of plant extracts on Neopestalotiopsis and Pseudopestalotiopsis causing fruit diseases</article-title>
					<source>Scientific Reports</source>
					<volume>11</volume>
					<issue>1</issue>
					<fpage>22606</fpage>
					<lpage>22606</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-021-02113-5</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B11">
				<mixed-citation> Gilardi, G. Bergeretti, F. Gullino, M.L. Garibaldi, A. 2019 First report of Neopestalotiopsis clavispora causing root and crown rot on strawberry in Italy Plant Disease 103 2959 10.1094/PDIS-03-19-0673-PDN </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Gilardi</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bergeretti</surname>
							<given-names>F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gullino</surname>
							<given-names>M.L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Garibaldi</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2019</year>
					<article-title>First report of Neopestalotiopsis clavispora causing root and crown rot on strawberry in Italy</article-title>
					<source>Plant Disease</source>
					<volume>103</volume>
					<fpage>2959</fpage>
					<lpage>2959</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-03-19-0673-PDN</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B12">
				<mixed-citation> Goldenhar K Pate E 2021 Pest Alert: Neopestalotiopsis - an emerging strawberry disease in North America <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://onfruit.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Pest-Alert-Neopestalotiopsis-.pdf">https://onfruit.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Pest-Alert-Neopestalotiopsis-.pdf</ext-link> (consulta, agosto 2023) </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="webpage">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<collab>Goldenhar K</collab>
						<collab>Pate E</collab>
					</person-group>
					<year>2021</year>
					<article-title>Pest Alert: Neopestalotiopsis - an emerging strawberry disease in North America</article-title>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://onfruit.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Pest-Alert-Neopestalotiopsis-.pdf">https://onfruit.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Pest-Alert-Neopestalotiopsis-.pdf</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B13">
				<mixed-citation> Lengai, G.M.W. Muthomi, J.W. Mbega, E.R. 2020 Phytochemical activity and role of botanical pesticides in pest management for sustainable agricultural crop production Scientific African 7 e00239 10.1016/j.sciaf.2019.e00239 </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Lengai</surname>
							<given-names>G.M.W.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Muthomi</surname>
							<given-names>J.W.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mbega</surname>
							<given-names>E.R.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2020</year>
					<article-title>Phytochemical activity and role of botanical pesticides in pest management for sustainable agricultural crop production</article-title>
					<source>Scientific African</source>
					<volume>7</volume>
					<elocation-id>e00239</elocation-id>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.sciaf.2019.e00239</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B14">
				<mixed-citation> Liu, P. Yang, R. Wang, Z. Ma, Y. Ren, W. Wei, D. Ye, W. 2024 Biocontrol Potential of Trichoderma asperellum CMT10 against Strawberry Root Rot Disease Horticulturae 10 246 10.3390/horticulturae10030246 </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Liu</surname>
							<given-names>P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Yang</surname>
							<given-names>R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>Z.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ma</surname>
							<given-names>Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ren</surname>
							<given-names>W.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wei</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ye</surname>
							<given-names>W.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2024</year>
					<article-title>Biocontrol Potential of Trichoderma asperellum CMT10 against Strawberry Root Rot Disease</article-title>
					<source>Horticulturae</source>
					<volume>10</volume>
					<fpage>246</fpage>
					<lpage>246</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/horticulturae10030246</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B15">
				<mixed-citation> Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N. Guo, L.D. Cai, L. Chukeatirote, E. Wu, W.P. Sun, X. Crous, P.W. Bhat, D.J. McKenzie, E.H.C. Bahkali, A.H. Hyde, K.D. 2012 A multi-locus backbone tree for Pestalotiopsis, with a polyphasic characterization of 14 new species Fungal Diversity 56 95-129 10.1007/s13225-012-0198-1 </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Maharachchikumbura</surname>
							<given-names>S.S.N.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Guo</surname>
							<given-names>L.D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Cai</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Chukeatirote</surname>
							<given-names>E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wu</surname>
							<given-names>W.P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sun</surname>
							<given-names>X.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Crous</surname>
							<given-names>P.W.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bhat</surname>
							<given-names>D.J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>McKenzie</surname>
							<given-names>E.H.C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bahkali</surname>
							<given-names>A.H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hyde</surname>
							<given-names>K.D.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2012</year>
					<article-title>A multi-locus backbone tree for Pestalotiopsis, with a polyphasic characterization of 14 new species</article-title>
					<source>Fungal Diversity</source>
					<volume>56</volume>
					<fpage>95</fpage>
					<lpage>129</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13225-012-0198-1</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B16">
				<mixed-citation> Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N. Hyde, K.D. Groenewald, J.Z. Xu, J. Crous, P.W. Pestalotiopsis revisited Studies in Mycology 79 121-186 10.1016/j.simyco.2014.09.005 </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Maharachchikumbura</surname>
							<given-names>S.S.N.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hyde</surname>
							<given-names>K.D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Groenewald</surname>
							<given-names>J.Z.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Xu</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Crous</surname>
							<given-names>P.W.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2014</year>
					<article-title>Pestalotiopsis revisited</article-title>
					<source>Studies in Mycology</source>
					<volume>79</volume>
					<fpage>121</fpage>
					<lpage>186</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.simyco.2014.09.005</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B17">
				<mixed-citation> Morales-Mora, L.A. Andrade-Hoyos, P. Valencia-de Ita, M.A. Romero-Arenas, O. Silva-Rojas, H.V. Contreras-Paredes, C.A. 2020 Characterization of strawberry associated fungi and in vitro antagonistic effect of Trichoderma harzianum Revista Mexicana de Fitopatología 38 3 434-449 10.18781/r.mex.fit.2005-7 </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Morales-Mora</surname>
							<given-names>L.A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Andrade-Hoyos</surname>
							<given-names>P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Valencia-de Ita</surname>
							<given-names>M.A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Romero-Arenas</surname>
							<given-names>O.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Silva-Rojas</surname>
							<given-names>H.V.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Contreras-Paredes</surname>
							<given-names>C.A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2020</year>
					<article-title>Characterization of strawberry associated fungi and in vitro antagonistic effect of Trichoderma harzianum</article-title>
					<source>Revista Mexicana de Fitopatología</source>
					<volume>38</volume>
					<issue>3</issue>
					<fpage>434</fpage>
					<lpage>449</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18781/r.mex.fit.2005-7</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B18">
				<mixed-citation> Mukherjee, M. Mukherjee, P.K. Horwitz, B.A. Zachow, C. Berg, G. Zeilinger, S. 2012 Trichoderma-plant-pathogen interactions: advances in genetics of biological control Indian Journal of Microbiology 52 4 522-529 10.1007/s12088-012-0308-5 </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Mukherjee</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mukherjee</surname>
							<given-names>P.K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Horwitz</surname>
							<given-names>B.A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zachow</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Berg</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zeilinger</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2012</year>
					<article-title>Trichoderma-plant-pathogen interactions: advances in genetics of biological control</article-title>
					<source>Indian Journal of Microbiology</source>
					<volume>52</volume>
					<issue>4</issue>
					<fpage>522</fpage>
					<lpage>529</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12088-012-0308-5</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B19">
				<mixed-citation> Mukherjee, P.K. Mendoza-Mendoza, A. Zeilinger, S. Horwitz, B.A. 2022 Mycoparasitism as a mechanism of Trichoderma-mediated suppression of plant diseases Fungal Biology Reviews 39 15-33 10.1016/j.fbr.2021.11.00 </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Mukherjee</surname>
							<given-names>P.K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mendoza-Mendoza</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zeilinger</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Horwitz</surname>
							<given-names>B.A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2022</year>
					<article-title>Mycoparasitism as a mechanism of Trichoderma-mediated suppression of plant diseases</article-title>
					<source>Fungal Biology Reviews</source>
					<volume>39</volume>
					<fpage>15</fpage>
					<lpage>33</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fbr.2021.11.00</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B20">
				<mixed-citation> Obregón, V.F. Meneguzzi, N.G. Ibañez, J.M. Lattar, T.E. Kirschbaum, D.S. 2018 First report of Neopestalotiopsis clavispora causing root and crown rot on strawberry plants in Argentina Plant Disease 102 9 1856 10.1094/PDIS-02-18-0330-PDN </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Obregón</surname>
							<given-names>V.F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Meneguzzi</surname>
							<given-names>N.G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ibañez</surname>
							<given-names>J.M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lattar</surname>
							<given-names>T.E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kirschbaum</surname>
							<given-names>D.S.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2018</year>
					<article-title>First report of Neopestalotiopsis clavispora causing root and crown rot on strawberry plants in Argentina</article-title>
					<source>Plant Disease</source>
					<volume>102</volume>
					<issue>9</issue>
					<fpage>1856</fpage>
					<lpage>1856</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-02-18-0330-PDN</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B21">
				<mixed-citation> Pandey, A.K. Kumar, A. Samota, M.K. Tanti, A. 2022 Trichoderma reesei as an elicitor triggers defense responses in tea plant and delays gray blight symptoms Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 188 105279 10.1016/j.pestbp.2022.105279 </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Pandey</surname>
							<given-names>A.K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kumar</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Samota</surname>
							<given-names>M.K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Tanti</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2022</year>
					<article-title>Trichoderma reesei as an elicitor triggers defense responses in tea plant and delays gray blight symptoms</article-title>
					<source>Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology</source>
					<volume>188</volume>
					<fpage>105279</fpage>
					<lpage>105279</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pestbp.2022.105279</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B22">
				<mixed-citation> Rebollar-Alviter, A. Silva-Rojas, H.V. Fuentes-Aragón, D. Acosta-González, U. Martínez-Ruiz, M. Parra-Robles, B.E. 2020 An emerging strawberry fungal disease associated with root rot, crown rot and leaf spot caused by Neopestalotiopsis rosae in Mexico Plant Disease 104 8 2054-2059 10.1094/PDIS-11-19-2493-SC </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Rebollar-Alviter</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Silva-Rojas</surname>
							<given-names>H.V.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Fuentes-Aragón</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Acosta-González</surname>
							<given-names>U.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Martínez-Ruiz</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Parra-Robles</surname>
							<given-names>B.E.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2020</year>
					<article-title>An emerging strawberry fungal disease associated with root rot, crown rot and leaf spot caused by Neopestalotiopsis rosae in Mexico</article-title>
					<source>Plant Disease</source>
					<volume>104</volume>
					<issue>8</issue>
					<fpage>2054</fpage>
					<lpage>2059</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-11-19-2493-SC</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B23">
				<mixed-citation> Shi, J. Zhang, X. Liu, Y. Zhang, Z. Wang, Z. Xue, C. Ma, Y. Wang, F. 2022 First Report of Neopestalotiopsis clavispora Causing Calyx and Receptacle Blight on Strawberry in China Plant Disease 106 4 1307 10.1094/PDIS-07-21-1376-PDN </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Shi</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zhang</surname>
							<given-names>X.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Liu</surname>
							<given-names>Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zhang</surname>
							<given-names>Z.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>Z.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Xue</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ma</surname>
							<given-names>Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>F.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2022</year>
					<article-title>First Report of Neopestalotiopsis clavispora Causing Calyx and Receptacle Blight on Strawberry in China</article-title>
					<source>Plant Disease</source>
					<volume>106</volume>
					<issue>4</issue>
					<fpage>1307</fpage>
					<lpage>1307</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-07-21-1376-PDN</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B24">
				<mixed-citation> SIAP, Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera 2024 Anuario Estadístico de la Producción Agrícola <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://nube.siap.gob.mx/cierreagricola/">https://nube.siap.gob.mx/cierreagricola/</ext-link> Consulta, enero 2024 </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="webpage">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<collab>SIAP, Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera</collab>
					</person-group>
					<year>2024</year>
					<article-title>Anuario Estadístico de la Producción Agrícola</article-title>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://nube.siap.gob.mx/cierreagricola/">https://nube.siap.gob.mx/cierreagricola/</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B25">
				<mixed-citation> Suárez, C. Fernández, R. Valero, N. Gámez, R. Páez, A. 2008 Antagonismo in vitro de Trichoderma harzianum Rifai sobre Fusarium solani (Mart.) Sacc. asociado a la marchitez en maracuyá Revista Colombiana de Biotecnología 10 3 35-43 </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Suárez</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Fernández</surname>
							<given-names>R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Valero</surname>
							<given-names>N.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gámez</surname>
							<given-names>R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Páez</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2008</year>
					<article-title>Antagonismo in vitro de Trichoderma harzianum Rifai sobre Fusarium solani (Mart.) Sacc. asociado a la marchitez en maracuyá</article-title>
					<source>Revista Colombiana de Biotecnología</source>
					<volume>10</volume>
					<issue>3</issue>
					<fpage>35</fpage>
					<lpage>43</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B26">
				<mixed-citation> Yao, X. Guo, H. Zhang, K. Zhao, M. Ruan, J. Chen, J. 2023 Trichoderma and its role in biological control of plant fungal and nematode disease Frontiers in Microbiology 14 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1160551 </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Yao</surname>
							<given-names>X.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Guo</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zhang</surname>
							<given-names>K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zhao</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ruan</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Chen</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2023</year>
					<article-title>Trichoderma and its role in biological control of plant fungal and nematode disease</article-title>
					<source>Frontiers in Microbiology</source>
					<volume>14</volume>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2023.1160551</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B27">
				<mixed-citation> Zhang, S. Wu, J. Chen, J. Jun, S. Yuan, Y. Dai, X. Wang, F. Ma, Y. 2024 The biological control effect of Bacillus cereus on strawberry leaf spot disease caused by Neopestalotiopsis clavispora Scientia Horticulturae 327 1 112841 10.1016/j.scienta.2024.112841 </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Zhang</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wu</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Chen</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Jun</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Yuan</surname>
							<given-names>Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Dai</surname>
							<given-names>X.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ma</surname>
							<given-names>Y.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2024</year>
					<article-title>The biological control effect of Bacillus cereus on strawberry leaf spot disease caused by Neopestalotiopsis clavispora</article-title>
					<source>Scientia Horticulturae</source>
					<volume>327</volume>
					<issue>1</issue>
					<fpage>112841</fpage>
					<lpage>112841</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scienta.2024.112841</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
		</ref-list>
	</back>
	<sub-article article-type="translation" id="s1" xml:lang="es">
		<front-stub>
			<article-categories>
				<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
					<subject>Articles</subject>
				</subj-group>
			</article-categories>
			<title-group>
				<article-title>Control in vitro de Neopestalotiopsis sp. aislada de fresa empleando Trichoderma y fungicidas comerciales</article-title>
			</title-group>
			<abstract>
				<title>Resumen:</title>
				<sec>
					<title>Antecedentes/Objetivo. </title>
					<p>El hongo Neopestalotiopsis sp. es un patógeno emergente que puede ocasionar pérdidas superiores al 70 % en el cultivo de fresa. Debido a esta situación, se busca implementar métodos de control de bajo impacto ecológico. El objetivo de este trabajo fue evaluar el efecto inhibitorio de cepas de Trichoderma sp. y de fungicidas empleados en el Bajío de Guanajuato, México, sobre el crecimiento de Neopestalotiopsis sp. <bold>Materiales y Métodos.</bold> El patógeno se aisló de plantas de fresa sintomáticas. Se realizó la caracterización morfológica y de patogenicidad del aislado. Las cepas de Trichoderma se obtuvieron de la colección biológica del Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias Campo Experimental Bajío (CEBAJ) y se confrontaron en cultivos duales con el patógeno, se determinó el porcentaje de inhibición del crecimiento radial (PICR) a las 120 h. Además, se evaluó el efecto de cinco fungicidas comerciales, que se agregaron al medio de crecimiento, sobre el diámetro de crecimiento del hongo.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<title>Resultados. </title>
					<p>Se obtuvo PICR en un intervalo de 63 al 70 %. El mecanismo de parasitismo de Trichoderma fue por enrollamiento, adhesión y lisis a las hifas del patógeno. La cepa T1 fue la que presentó mayor potencial para el control del patógeno, seguido de T5 y T7. Tres fungicidas comerciales, Tebuconazol (100 mL 100 L<sup>-1</sup>), Extracto de Canela y Neem (500 mL 100 L<sup>-1</sup>), y el Ácido Peracético (25 mL 100 L<sup>-1</sup>) inhibieron completamente el crecimiento del hongo.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<title>Conclusión. </title>
					<p>Estos resultados contribuyen al conocimiento sobre el control de Neopestalotiopsis sp. con la aplicación de Trichoderma y los productos autorizados en México.</p>
				</sec>
			</abstract>
			<kwd-group xml:lang="es">
				<title>Palabras Clave:</title>
				<kwd>Inhibición de crecimiento fúngico</kwd>
				<kwd>microorganismos benéficos</kwd>
				<kwd>patógenos de fresa</kwd>
				<kwd>Extracto de Canela-Neem</kwd>
				<kwd>Ácido Peracético</kwd>
			</kwd-group>
		</front-stub>
		<body>
			<sec sec-type="intro">
				<title>Introducción</title>
				<p>El cultivo de fresa (Fragaria x ananasa) tiene gran importancia económica para México y actualmente ocupa el tercer lugar como proveedor de fresa en el mundo, con un valor de la producción mayor de 15,400 millones de pesos (SIAP, 2024). No obstante, existen patógenos que pueden disminuir la producción y ocasionar pérdidas económicas como la enfermedad de la secadera ocasionada por especies del género Neopestalotiopsis, una de ellas de reciente introducción y que puede ocasionar mermas superiores al 70 % de la producción. La sintomatología incluye pudrición de raíz, corona y manchas foliares (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Rebollar-Alviter et al., 2020</xref>), y en los frutos se presentan lesiones de aproximadamente 2-4 mm que se extienden hasta causar pudrición y momificación (Goldenhar y Pate, 2021). Debido a la escasa información del patógeno, se han estudiado estrategias de control en campo como prácticas culturales, control químico y biológico (Rebollar- Alviter et al., 2020). Se ha indicado que para el control de este patógeno se pueden emplear agentes antagónicos de los géneros Trichoderma, Bacillus y Pseudomonas (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Zhang et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Amrutha y Vijayaraghavan, 2018</xref>). En particular el efecto antagónico de Trichoderma se debe a la acción de enzimas, que pueden degradar la pared celular, quitina, proteínas y lípidos (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Pandey et al. 2022</xref>). Además, produce metabolitos secundarios como policétidos, péptidos no ribosomales, terpenoides, pironas, antibiótico entre otros, los cuales funcionan como inhibidores del crecimiento; además, puede actuar como micoparásito, competir por espacio o por nutrientes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Mukherjee et al., 2012</xref>). En el caso del control con agroquímicos, aunque existen productos autorizados para emplearse en fresa (COFEPRIS, 2024), ya sea como molécula sintética o extractos vegetales, no es precisa la información para el control de Neopestalotiopsis. En este sentido, el objetivo de este trabajo fue evaluar el efecto inhibitorio de cepas de Trichoderma sp. sobre el crecimiento de este Neopestalotiopsis sp. aislada de fresa, y el control con fungicidas comerciales que se emplean en algunas localidades del Bajío de Guanajuato. La información que se generó muestra la importancia del uso de Trichoderma y fungicidas comerciales efectivos para reducir el crecimiento de este patógeno en la producción de fresa.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec sec-type="materials|methods">
				<title>Materiales y métodos</title>
				<p>Las cepas de Trichoderma sp. fueron proporcionadas por el Laboratorio de Microbiología Agrícola del Área de Transformación del Campo Experimental Bajío (CEBAJ) del Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias y previamente aisladas de diferentes sustratos y lugares de México (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">Cuadro 1</xref>). La reactivación se realizó en Papa Dextrosa Agar (PDA) a 26±2 °C.</p>
				<p>
					<table-wrap id="t4">
						<label>Cuadro 1</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Datos de identificación, sustrato de aislamiento y procedencia de cepas de Trichoderma sp. empleadas en el control biológico de Neopestalotiopsis sp.</title>
						</caption>
						<table border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" style="border-collapse: collapse; width: 100%; text-align: center;">
							<thead>
								<tr>
									<th>Nombre de la cepa</th>
									<th>Sustrato</th>
									<th>Lugar de procedencia</th>
								</tr>
							</thead>
							<tbody>
								<tr>
									<td>8L9</td>
									<td>Lixiviado</td>
									<td>Talea de Castro, Oaxaca, México</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>1752</td>
									<td>Suelo agrícola</td>
									<td>Santiago Coltzingo, Puebla, México</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>1S1</td>
									<td>Composta</td>
									<td>Palma Sola, Veracruz</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>THP</td>
									<td>Suelo agrícola</td>
									<td>San José de Pantoja, Valle de Santiago, Guanajuato, México</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>675, T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, T6, T7</td>
									<td>Suelo agrícola, cultivo de plátano</td>
									<td>Piedra Parada, Veracruz</td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>
					</table-wrap>
				</p>
				<sec>
					<title><italic>Aislamiento de Neopestalotiopsis sp. en fresa y caracterización morfológica</italic></title>
					<p>En julio de 2022 se aisló Neopestalotiopsis sp. de plantas sintomáticas de fresa var. San Andrés del invernadero de hortalizas del CEBAJ. Se colectaron hojas, frutos y tallos que se depositaron en bolsas de plástico para su traslado al laboratorio. Se cortaron trozos de tejido de aproximadamente 1 cm<sup>2</sup> y se desinfestaron con NaClO 5% durante 60 segundos. Se lavaron tres veces con agua estéril, el material vegetal se dejó secar sobre una toalla de papel estéril. Posteriormente se sembró en cajas Petri desechables que contenían PDA y amoxicilina (30 mg 1000 µL<sup>-1</sup>), se incubaron a 26±2°C. Una vez que el patógeno esporuló, se tomó un acérvulo con una aguja de disección y se suspendió en 1000 µL de agua estéril, a continuación, la solución se homogenizó en vórtex y se tomaron 100 µL para sembrar por extensión en placa. La incubación se realizó a 26±2 °C por 24 h. Pasado este tiempo y bajo el microscopio estereoscópico se tomaron conidios germinados y se llevaron a medio PDA para la obtención de colonias monospóricas, las que se incubaron a 26±2 °C. La caracterización morfológica de Neopestalotiopsis sp. se realizó basándose en la descripción a nivel género con las características descritas por <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Maharachchikumbura et al. (2012</xref>) y Maharachchikumbura et al. (2014).</p>
				</sec>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>Pruebas de patogenicidad</title>
				<p>Para comprobar la patogenicidad del aislado, se sembró el hongo y se dejó crecer por cinco días. Con ayuda de un sacabocado se tomaron cinco discos de 5 mm de medio invadido y se colocaron en la corona de la fresa. Este procedimiento se realizó en 15 macetas con plantas sanas de fresa var. San Andrés. Adicionalmente, se colocaron dos discos en hojas y tallos para corroborar la patogenicidad del hongo. Las plantas se regaron cada 48 h y se cubrieron con una bolsa de polietileno para alcanzar una humedad relativa &gt; 90 %. Se observó la sintomatología que se presentó después de la inoculación (di).</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title><italic>Actividad antagónica de Trichoderma sobre Neopestalotiopsis sp.</italic></title>
				<p>Para determinar la actividad antagónica se empleó la metodología de cultivo dual descrita por <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Correa et al. (2007</xref>), que indica colocar un disco del patógeno y otro del hongo antagonista en lados opuestos, a 1 cm del borde de la caja Petri (90 x 15 mm). La prueba se realizó con ocho repeticiones en medio PDA libre de antibiótico. Se emplearon discos de 5 mm de diámetro de cultivo con micelio del patógeno y de las cepas de Trichoderma sp. previamente crecidos en PDA por cinco días, al patógeno se le dio ventaja de crecimiento de tres días. La incubación se realizó a 26±2 °C. Cada ocho horas se midió el crecimiento radial del patógeno hasta llegar a las 120 h. El porcentaje de inhibición del crecimiento radial (PICR) se obtuvo a partir del crecimiento de cada patógeno en el cultivo dual, junto con sus respectivos testigos, empleando la fórmula utilizada por <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Suárez et al. (2008</xref>):</p>
				<p>𝑃𝐼𝐶𝑅 =</p>
				<p> 𝑅1 − 𝑅2</p>
				<p>
					<inline-graphic xlink:href="2007-8080-rmfi-42-04-RMEXFIT202428-i017.gif"/>
				</p>
				<p>𝑅1</p>
				<p>𝑋100</p>
				<p>Donde PICR=porcentaje de inhibición de crecimiento radial; R1=crecimiento radial (mm) del patógeno sin Trichoderma, R2=crecimiento radial (mm) del patógeno con Trichoderma.</p>
				<p>Adicionalmente, se evaluó la capacidad antagónica de los aislados seleccionados según la escala de <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bell et al. (1982</xref>), donde Clase 1: el agente antagónico coloniza completamente al fitopatógeno y cubre totalmente la superficie del medio; Clase 2: el agente antagónico coloniza las dos terceras partes de medio de cultivo, limitando el crecimiento del fitopatógeno; Clase 3: el agente antagónico y el patógeno colonizan cada uno la mitad de la superficie, el crecimiento es similar, Clase 4: el fitopatógeno coloniza las dos terceras partes de la superficie del medio de cultivo y limita el crecimiento del agente antagónico, y Clase 5: el fitopatógeno coloniza completamente el medio del cultivo y crece sobre el agente antagónico. Se analizó el PICR mediante un análisis de varianza (ANOVA) con un diseño completamente al azar. La comparación múltiple de medias se realizó con el método de Tukey (p&lt; 0.05). Los datos se analizaron con el Programa R versión 4.4.0.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>Micoparasitismo</title>
				<p>Para observar la presencia de parasitismo de las cepas de Trichoderma hacia Neopestalotiopsis se usó la técnica de microcultivos duales. En los ensayos se evaluaron 15 cepas de Trichoderma contrapuestas con el patógeno Neopestalotiopsisis, se realizaron tres repeticiones. Los microcultivos se prepararon con un portaobjetos a los que se les aplicó una capa de medio (16 g agar bacteriológico + 10 g PDA para 1 L), libre de antibiótico, para las confrontaciones se emplearon discos de 5 mm de diámetro del micelio del patógeno y de Trichoderma previamente crecidos en PDA por cinco días. En un extremo del portaobjetos se colocó un disco del patógeno, con una diferencia de 24 h, esto debido a que el crecimiento del patógeno presentó un crecimiento más lento en comparación con Trichoderma. En el extremo equidistante se colocó un disco de Trichoderma. Las preparaciones se incubaron a 26±2 °C. Cuando ambos hongos entraron en contacto (aproximadamente 24 h), se retiró el portaobjetos de la caja Petri y con ayuda de una tira de cinta adhesiva transparente se tomó una muestra de micelio, se agregó una gota de azul de algodón para poder observar bajo el microscopio y determinar el tipo de parasitismo de las cepas de Trichoderma.</p>
				<sec>
					<title><italic>Pruebas de inhibición de crecimiento de Neopestalotiopsis con fungicidas comerciales</italic></title>
					<p>Se determinó el efecto de inhibición sobre crecimiento del patógeno de cinco productos comerciales: el fungicida de contacto Captan (Captan 50®), el fungicida sistémico Tebuconazol (Folicur®), el fungicida sistémico Carbendazim (Agrosys®), Extracto de Canela y Neem (Nymeria®), Ácido Peracético (Microclean®) y un fungicida orgánico a base de cítricos de venta local. Cada fungicida se evaluó en tres concentraciones (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t5">Cuadro 2</xref>), que se eligieron considerando las recomendaciones de fabricante en la ficha técnica, se utilizó en una concentración mínima, una intermedia y la máxima recomendada. Se realizaron cinco repeticiones por cada concentración más un control. Las pruebas se realizaron en cajas Petri con PDA libre de antibióticos. Los fungicidas se incorporaron al medio cuando presentó una temperatura de 45-50 °C. Al centro de cada caja se colocó un disco de 5 mm del medio de crecimiento de Neopestalotiopsis, crecido previamente por cinco días en PDA. Cada 8 h se determinó el diámetro de crecimiento hasta llegar a las 120 h. El control se estableció en PDA sin fungicida. Las pruebas se realizaron con cinco repeticiones. Para el análisis estadístico los datos se acomodaron en un diseño completamente al azar. Estos datos se analizaron en un ANOVA utilizando el Programa de R versión 4.4.0. Se realizó la comparación múltiple de medias con el método de Tukey (p≤0.05).</p>
					<p>
						<table-wrap id="t5">
							<label>Cuadro 2</label>
							<caption>
								<title>Fungicidas evaluados en la inhibición del crecimiento de Neopestalotiopsis sp.</title>
							</caption>
							<table border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" style="border-collapse: collapse; width: 100%; text-align: center;">
								<thead>
									<tr>
										<th>Fungicida</th>
										<th>Dosis (L<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
									</tr>
								</thead>
								<tbody>
									<tr>
										<td>Captan</td>
										<td>2 g (A), 3 g (B), 4 g (C)</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td>Tebuconazol</td>
										<td>1 mL (D), 2.5 mL (E), 3.75 mL (F)</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td>Carbendazim</td>
										<td>4 mL (G), 5 mL (H), 6 mL (I)</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td>Extracto de Canela y Neem</td>
										<td>5 mL (J), 10 mL (K), 15 mL (L)</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td>Ácido Peracético</td>
										<td>0.25 mL (M), 0.50 mL (N), 0.75 mL (O)</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td>Fungicida orgánico a base de cítricos</td>
										<td>5 mL (P), 7.5 mL (Q), 10 mL (R)</td>
									</tr>
								</tbody>
							</table>
							<table-wrap-foot>
								<fn id="TFN2">
									<p>Nota: Las letras en el paréntesis se usarán para referir el tratamiento aplicado.</p>
								</fn>
							</table-wrap-foot>
						</table-wrap>
					</p>
				</sec>
			</sec>
			<sec sec-type="results|discussion">
				<title>Resultados y discusión</title>
				<sec>
					<title>Identificación de síntomas en plantas de fresa</title>
					<p>Se observaron síntomas en plantas según lo documentado por <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Rebollar-Alviter et al. (2020</xref>): tizón en hojas, muerte regresiva de los brotes, pudrición y deformación de frutos, achaparramiento de plantas, así como pudrición de la raíz y la corona (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f8">Figura 1</xref>). Estos síntomas son similares entre especies de Neopestalotiopsis. Al respecto, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Baggio et al. (2021</xref>) menciona que los tejidos más afectados por N. rosae son la raíz y cuello de la raíz, aunque tienen una baja incidencia en frutos y hojas. De la misma forma, autores como <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Obregón et al. (2018</xref>) indicaron que N. clavispora muestra síntomas en hojas en las que manifiestan zonas intervenales necróticas de color rojizo que comienzan en los márgenes y van avanzando conforme se hace senescente el tejido. Según los autores, la raíz y el cuello de esta también se ve afectado lo que finalmente provoca la muerte de la planta. La especie N. clavispora causa tizón en el cáliz y en el receptáculo de fresa (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Shi et al., 2022</xref>).</p>
					<p>
						<fig id="f8">
							<label>Figura 1</label>
							<caption>
								<title>Síntomas en plantas de fresa infectadas por Neopestaloptiosis sp. A) Achaparramiento de plantas, B) Tizón en hojas, C y D) Deformación en frutos maduros e inmaduros.</title>
							</caption>
							<graphic xlink:href="2007-8080-rmfi-42-04-RMEXFIT202428-gf8.gif"/>
						</fig>
					</p>
				</sec>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>Identificación del agente causal</title>
				<p>Después de ocho días de crecimiento, las colonias en medio PDA presentaron textura algodonosa, micelio color blanco que fue tornándose a salmón y márgenes concéntricos. Cuando el cultivo tuvo seis días se formaron masas negras de esporas (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f9">Figura 2</xref>). A los 12 días se produjeron acérvulos globosos de color negro en el medio de crecimiento y sobre el tejido los estromas presentaron forma irregular (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f9">Figura 2</xref>). Los conidios presentaron tres células centrales de color oscuro y dos basales hialinas, con tres apéndices apicales (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f9">Figura 2</xref>). La morfología del patógeno coincidió con las características de género descritas por Maharachchikumbura et al. (2014); sin embargo, de acuerdo con algunas características señaladas por Maharachchikumbura et al. (2012), el aislado de Neopestaloptiopsis de este estudio podría tratarse de N. rosae, especie que fue confirmada presente en cultivo de fresa en México (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Rebollar-Alviter et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
				<p>
					<fig id="f9">
						<label>Figura 2</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Crecimiento de Neopestalotiopsis sp. en medio PDA después de dos semanas de la inoculación. A) Desarrollo de colonias en medio de cultivo con acérvulos negros, B y C) Conidios del hongo.</title>
						</caption>
						<graphic xlink:href="2007-8080-rmfi-42-04-RMEXFIT202428-gf9.gif"/>
					</fig>
				</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title><italic>Patogenicidad de Neopestaloptiosis sp.</italic></title>
				<p>Las plantas inoculadas con el aislado presentaron síntomas 24 h di (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f10">Figura 3</xref>), donde inicialmente se observaron pequeñas manchas marrones de 2 mm en hojas, después de 56 h di se observó tizón de hojas, necrosis en tallo y debilitamiento de la planta (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f10">Figura 3</xref>). Después de 168 h di los daños se encontraron muy avanzados, el tallo presentó necrosis en aproximadamente 70 % del tallo y ablandamiento total. Las manchas presentes en las hojas abarcaron más del 80 % de la superficie foliar (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f10">Figura 3</xref>). La sintomatología coincidió con la documentada por <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Rebollar Alviter et al. (2020</xref>) y <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Gilardi et al. (2019</xref>) en cultivo de fresa, tanto en hojas como en fruto.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title><italic>Actividad antagónica de Trichoderma sobre Neopestalotiopsis</italic></title>
				<p>El análisis estadístico indicó que existieron diferencias significativas (p &lt; 0.05) en la inhibición del crecimiento entre las cepas evaluadas. De acuerdo con la comparación de medias se encontraron tres grupos de inhibición, la cepa T1 fue la que presentó el mayor PICR (70 %), mientras que las cepas T675, T2 y T10 fueron las que exhibieron menor inhibición (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f11">Figura 4</xref>). En general el PICR se mantuvo entre el 60 al 70 %, por lo que las cepas pueden considerarse con potencial para el control del patógeno. Al respecto <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Yao et al. (2023</xref>) tras un análisis de diferentes estudios indica que una cepa de Trichoderma puede considerarse con potencial en el control efectivo de la enfermedad cuando la inhibición de crecimiento supera el 50 %.</p>
				<p>
					<fig id="f10">
						<label>Figura 3</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Síntomas en plantas de fresa causadas por Neopestalotiopsis sp. A) Tizón en hojas, B) Necrosis en tallo y C) Necrosis en cuello y raíz.</title>
						</caption>
						<graphic xlink:href="2007-8080-rmfi-42-04-RMEXFIT202428-gf10.gif"/>
					</fig>
				</p>
				<p>Algunos autores han evaluado el efecto de Trichoderma para el control de Neopestalotiopsis. Uno de los primeros trabajos fue el de Mora-Morales et al. (2020) quienes evaluaron in vitro el efecto antagónico de T. harzianum sobre Pestalotiopsis (Neopestalotiopsis sp.), sus resultados mostraron una PICR del 71.11 %. Otros autores como <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Amrutha y Vijayaraghavan (2018</xref>) evaluaron el efecto antagónico de T. asperellum contra Neopestalotiopsis clavispora aislada de fresa, determinaron en promedio 66 % de inhibición en el crecimiento del patógeno en pruebas in vitro; y una reducción de la enfermedad del 74 %. Los autores indicaron que para el manejo de la enfermedad con productos biológicos y químicos es necesario considerar las condiciones agroclimáticas para tener una mayor eficiencia en el control. En otro estudio realizado por <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Liu et al. (2024</xref>) en el que evaluaron el efecto antagónico de metabolitos volátiles y metabolitos de fermentación producidos por T. asperellum sobre el crecimiento de N. clavispora, determinaron inhibición de 79.67 y 69.84 %, respectivamente. También identificaron que, el efecto antagónico se debió a la competencia por el sustrato, producción de antimicóticos y parasitismo. Adicionalmente, indicaron que la aplicación de T. asperellum promovió el crecimiento de la fresa, la altura de la planta, la longitud de la raíz, el peso fresco total, el peso de la raíz, el peso fresco del tallo y el peso seco de la raíz. Por otra parte, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Pandey et al. (2022</xref>) determinaron que T. reesei incidió en el crecimiento in vitro de Pseudopestalotiopsis theae, sus resultados mostraron una inhibición del 81.2 %. Cuando llevaron el experimento a plantas en condiciones de vivero la severidad de la enfermedad fue de entre 67.5 y 75 %. En este sentido los autores indicaron que T. reesei fue capaz de producir metabolitos volátiles y no volátiles con efecto inhibitorio, además en las plantas inoculadas con el antagonista encontraron acumulación de enzimas de defensa como polifenol oxidasa, peroxidasa, fenilalanina amonio liasa, β-1, 3-glucanasa, y quitinasa. De la misma forma, a los 45 di estas plantas mostraron aumento en la altura, diámetro del tallo, peso brotes y raíces.</p>
				<p>
					<fig id="f11">
						<label>Figura 4</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Porcentaje de Inhibición de Crecimiento Radial de Neopestalotiopsis sp. obtenidos por confrontación con cepas de Trichoderma (p≤0.05).</title>
						</caption>
						<graphic xlink:href="2007-8080-rmfi-42-04-RMEXFIT202428-gf11.gif"/>
					</fig>
				</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title><italic>Antagonismo de las cepas de Trichoderma</italic></title>
				<p>Según la escala de <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bell et al. (1982</xref>), se encontraron niveles de antagonismos II y III (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t6">Cuadro 3</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f12">Figura 5</xref>), es decir en el tipo II las cepas de Trichoderma colonizaron las dos terceras partes de medio de cultivo, limitando el crecimiento del fitopatógeno; en el III, Trichoderma y el patógeno colonizaron cada uno la mitad de la superficie, el crecimiento fue similar entre las cepas (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t6">Cuadro 3</xref>). Diversos autores han indicado que Trichoderma posee diferentes mecanismos de antagonismo, destacando el micoparasitismo, competencia por espacio y alimento y la antibiosis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Álvarez et al., 2022</xref>). Uno de los principales es el micoparasitismo, pueden presentar estructuras en forma de ganchos, enrollamientos o apresorios alrededor del hospedante que le permiten penetrar al interior del patógeno y degradarlo (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Mukherjee et al., 2022</xref>; Álvarez et al., 2022). Este mecanismo está acompañado por la secreción de enzimas como la quitina para degradar la pared celular del patógeno (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Yao et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Companioni-González et al., 2019</xref>).</p>
				<p>En este estudio se encontraron los mecanismos de micoparasitimo: adhesión y enrollamiento de las cepas de Trichoderma a la hifa del patógeno, además de lisis de hifa, formación de ganchos y penetración del antagonista al patógeno (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f13">Figura 6</xref>).</p>
				<p>
					<fig id="f12">
						<label>Figura 5</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Confrontaciones de cepas de Trichoderma contra Neopestalotiopsis sp. Donde T = Trichoderma y P = patógeno. El número que se encuentra en la parte superior derecha corresponde a la identificación de la cepa de Trichoderma. Se observa que T1, T5 y T7 mantiene un nivel de antagonismo de II, mientras que T4, T8 y T10 un nivel III.</title>
						</caption>
						<graphic xlink:href="2007-8080-rmfi-42-04-RMEXFIT202428-gf12.gif"/>
					</fig>
				</p>
				<p>
					<fig id="f13">
						<label>Figura 6</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Mecanismos de parasitismo de Trichoderma sp frente a Neopestaloptiopsis sp. A) Enrollamiento, B) Formación de ganchos y C) Adhesión y lisis.</title>
						</caption>
						<graphic xlink:href="2007-8080-rmfi-42-04-RMEXFIT202428-gf13.gif"/>
					</fig>
				</p>
				<p>
					<table-wrap id="t6">
						<label>Cuadro 3</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Nivel de antagonismo según <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bell et al. (1982</xref>) y mecanismos de micoparasitismo.</title>
						</caption>
						<table border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" style="border-collapse: collapse; width: 100%; text-align: center;">
							<thead>
								<tr>
									<th>Nivel de antagonismo</th>
									<th>Cepa</th>
									<th>Mecanismo del micoparasitismo</th>
								</tr>
							</thead>
							<tbody>
								<tr>
									<td>II</td>
									<td>1S1, T175, T675, T5</td>
									<td>Adhesión, enrollamiento</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>II</td>
									<td>8L9, T3</td>
									<td>Enrollamiento, formación de ganchos</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>II</td>
									<td>THP</td>
									<td>Lisis, enrollamiento</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>II</td>
									<td>T1, T2</td>
									<td>Adhesión</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>II</td>
									<td>T3</td>
									<td>Enrollamiento, formación de ganchos</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>II</td>
									<td>T6</td>
									<td>Adhesión, enrollamiento, formación de ganchos</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>II</td>
									<td>T7</td>
									<td>Adhesión, penetración a hifa</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>III</td>
									<td>T4, T8</td>
									<td>Enrollamiento</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>III</td>
									<td>T9, T10</td>
									<td>Enrollamiento, formación de ganchos</td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>
					</table-wrap>
				</p>
				<sec>
					<title><italic>Evaluación de control de Neopestalotiopsis sp. empleando fungicidas comerciales</italic></title>
					<p>De acuerdo con el análisis estadístico, se encontraron diferencias significativas entre tratamientos. La comparación de medias indicó que el fungicida sistémico Tebuconazol, el Extracto de Canela y Neem, y el Ácido Peracético, en todas las concentraciones empleadas, fueron los productos que inhibieron el crecimiento de Neopestalotiopsis sp. en 100 % (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f14">Figura 7</xref>). El fungicida de contacto Captan inhibió el crecimiento del patógeno en 81, 83 y 86 %, siguiéndole el fungicida orgánico a base de cítricos con 52, 60 y 63 %; y el fungicida sistémico Carbendazim inhibió en un 28, 42 y 52 % con respecto al testigo.</p>
					<p>
						<fig id="f14">
							<label>Figura 7</label>
							<caption>
								<title>Crecimiento de Neopestalotiopsis sp en medio PDA con fungicidas comerciales. Test: testigo sin producto; A-C: Captán 200, 300 y 400 g 100 L<sup>-1</sup>; D-F: Tebuconazol 100, 250 y 375 mL 100 L<sup>-1</sup>; G-I: Carbendazim 400, 500 y 600 mL 100 L<sup>-1</sup>; J-L: Extracto de Canela y Neem 500, 1000 y 1500 mL 100 L<sup>-1</sup>; M-O: Ácido Peracético 25, 50 y 75 mL 100 L<sup>-1</sup>; P-R: Fungicida orgánico a base de cítricos 500, 750 y 1000 mL 100 L<sup>-1</sup>. 400 g y 600 mL 100 L<sup>-1</sup> (p≤0.05).</title>
							</caption>
							<graphic xlink:href="2007-8080-rmfi-42-04-RMEXFIT202428-gf14.gif"/>
						</fig>
					</p>
					<p>Debido a las grandes pérdidas económicas que ha generado Neopestaloptiopsis se han realizado estudios para determinar el manejo de la enfermedad, al respecto Rebollar- Alviter et al. (2020) evaluaron el control in vitro de Neopestaloptiosis rosae empleando Captan y otros productos como Azoxistrobin, Fenopyroxad + Piraclostrobina, Piraclostrobina + Boscalid, Iprodiona, Difenoconazol, Prochloraz, Cyprodinil + Fludioxonil. Los resultados en cuanto a la inhibición en el crecimiento del patógenos sugirieron que Captan, Fludioxonil + Cyprodinil, Difenoconazol e Iprodion tuvieron el mayor efecto para el control de Neopestaloptiopsis. De la misma forma, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Baggio et al. (2023</xref>) realizaron estudios para determinar la sensibilidad de patógeno frente a fungicidas comerciales, sus resultados indicaron que Captan, Thiram y Clorotalonil tuvieron mayor efectividad. Autores como Acosta-González et al. (2024) señalaron que, al aplicar fungicidas, principalmente Pidiflumetofen + Fludioxonil, Ciprodinil + Fludioxonil y Procloraz de forma preventiva, lograron la disminución de la incidencia y severidad de la enfermedad, también disminuyó la mortalidad de las plantas. Los autores indicaron que cuando los fungicidas se aplicaron de forma preventiva se consiguió una eficiencia del 99 al 100 %; sin embargo, cuando se usaron de forma curativa, es decir después que se expresaron los síntomas, la eficiencia fue de 0 al 37 %.</p>
					<p>Por otro lado, productos a base de extractos vegetales como ajo, manzanilla, ruda, canela, tagetes, acacia, neem, chile, pimienta, agave, ruda, ricino, chicalote, pino, cítricos, gobernadora y otros, están autorizados en México como plaguicidas para el cultivo de fresa (COFEPRIS, 2024). Por lo tanto, son una alternativa importante para el manejo orgánico en este cultivo. Los resultados que se obtuvieron en este trabajo con el Extracto de Canela y Neem demostraron que puede aplicarse para inhibir el crecimiento del patógeno sin causar estragos ambientales a largo plazo. Otros autores como <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Darapanit et al. (2021</xref>) demostraron que extractos etanólicos a base de cúrcuma (Curcuma longa), jengibre (Zingiber officinale), zacate limón (Cymbopogon citratus), jamaica (Hibiscus sabdariffa) y clavo de olor (Syzygium aromaticum) inhibieron el crecimiento de cepas de Neopestalotiopsis y Pseudopestalotiopsis, principalmente los extractos de Cúrcuma y clavo de olor en concentraciones de 10,000 mg L<sup>-1</sup>. En general los extractos a base de plantas producen metabolitos secundarios como esteroides, alcaloides, taninos, terpenos, fenoles, flavonoides y resinas que presentan propiedades antimicrobianas (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Lengai et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
				</sec>
			</sec>
			<sec sec-type="conclusions">
				<title>Conclusiones</title>
				<p>El control in vitro obtenido con las 15 cepas de Trichoderma evaluadas se determinó por el PICR en un intervalo de 63 al 70 %. La cepa T1 fue la que presentó mayor porcentaje de inhibición en el crecimiento radial del patógeno. El nivel de antagonismo que se encontró fue clase II y clase III, con mecanismos de parasitismo de enrollamiento, adhesión a la hifa del patógeno y lisis. En el caso del control de crecimiento del patógeno con los fungicidas, se determinó 100 % de inhibición con Tebuconazol, Extracto de Canela y Neem y Ácido Peracético; los ingredientes activos Captan y Carbendazim tuvieron una inhibición del crecimiento del 86 y 52 % con las dosis 400 g y 600 mL 100 L<sup>-1</sup>, respectivamente. Los resultados de este estudio son referencia para el desarrollo de un manejo integral con aplicaciones preventivas y de control con Trichoderma sp. y productos orgánicos como alternativa a moléculas químicas, que contribuyen en la reducción de inóculo primario proporcionando una protección a las plantas una vez establecidas en campo.</p>
			</sec>
		</body>
	</sub-article>
</article>