<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article
  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.1" specific-use="sps-1.9" xml:lang="en" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
	<front>
		<journal-meta>
			<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">rmfi</journal-id>
			<journal-title-group>
				<journal-title>Revista mexicana de fitopatología</journal-title>
				<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">Rev. mex. fitopatol</abbrev-journal-title>
			</journal-title-group>
			<issn pub-type="ppub">0185-3309</issn>
			<issn pub-type="epub">2007-8080</issn>
			<publisher>
				<publisher-name>Sociedad Mexicana de Fitopatología A.C.</publisher-name>
			</publisher>
		</journal-meta>
		<article-meta>
			<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18781/R.MEX.FIT.2505-2</article-id>
			<article-id pub-id-type="other">00014</article-id>
			<article-categories>
				<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
					<subject>Phytopathological Note</subject>
				</subj-group>
			</article-categories>
			<title-group>
				<article-title><italic>In vitro</italic> effect of pydiflumetofen against <italic>Fusarium virguliforme</italic> and <italic>Sclerotinia sclerotiorum</italic> isolates from soybean in Iowa, USA</article-title>
			</title-group>
			<contrib-group>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Nieto-Lopez</surname>
						<given-names>Edgar H</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Bierl</surname>
						<given-names>Austin</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Chang-Villatoro</surname>
						<given-names>Desiree</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Joshi</surname>
						<given-names>Parbati</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>González-Acuña</surname>
						<given-names>José F.</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Wiggs</surname>
						<given-names>Stith</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Mueller</surname>
						<given-names>Daren</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<aff id="aff1">
					<label>1</label>
					<institution content-type="original"> Iowa State University, Department of Plant Pathology, Entomology, and Microbiology, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.</institution>
					<institution content-type="normalized">Iowa State University</institution>
					<institution content-type="orgname">Iowa State University</institution>
					<institution content-type="orgdiv1">Department of Plant Pathology</institution>
					<addr-line>
						<postal-code>50011</postal-code>
					</addr-line>
					<country country="US">USA</country>
				</aff>
			</contrib-group>
			<author-notes>
				<corresp id="c1">
					<label><italic>*</italic></label><bold>
 <italic>Autor de Correspondencia:</italic> 
</bold> Daren Mueller <email>dsmuelle@iastate.edu</email>
				</corresp>
			</author-notes>
			<pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic">
				<day>10</day>
				<month>06</month>
				<year>2026</year>
			</pub-date>
			<pub-date date-type="collection" publication-format="electronic">
				<season>Jan-Apr</season>
				<year>2026</year>
			</pub-date>
			<volume>44</volume>
			<issue>1</issue>
			<elocation-id>RMEXFIT25052</elocation-id>
			<history>
				<date date-type="received">
					<day>05</day>
					<month>05</month>
					<year>2025</year>
				</date>
				<date date-type="accepted">
					<day>20</day>
					<month>10</month>
					<year>2025</year>
				</date>
			</history>
			<permissions>
				<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/" xml:lang="en">
					<license-p>Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons</license-p>
				</license>
			</permissions>
			<abstract>
				<title>ABSTRACT</title>
				<p> </p>
				<sec>
					<title>Background/Objective. </title>
					<p>Sudden death syndrome caused by <italic>Fusarium virguliforme</italic> (Fv) and White mold caused by <italic>Sclerotinia sclerotiorum</italic> (Ss) are the most important soybean disease in regards to yield loss in the Northern USA. Few studies have estimated for Fv and Ss isolates from Iowa, the EC50 mycelial growth of the fungicide pydiflumetofen for Fv and Ss; likewise, the EC50 sclerotial production for Ss.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<title>Experimental development. </title>
					<p>Potato dextrose agar (PDA) at 1/3 strength was amended with Saltro<sup>?</sup>(pydiflumetofen 41.7%) at 0.0008, 0.0042, 0.0083, 0.0417, 0.0834, 0.8340, and 834 ppm from serial dilutions. Isolates were incubated in darkness at 25 °C. Fv isolates were evaluated at 7 days and Ss isolates at 48 h after inoculation, measuring the radial growth. The sclerotia number and dried-weight were measured after 21 days of incubation.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<title>Results. </title>
					<p>Pydiflumetofen absolute EC50 values for mycelial growth Fv were 0.045 and 0.048 ppm. The Fv contemporary isolate (FV-RD-0024; collected in year 2024), and the historical isolate (NE205; collected in year 2006-years before pydiflumetofen introduction in the market), both presented EC50 mycelial growth in the range of the baseline (0.04-0.24 ppm) in the USA. EC50 values for the mycelial growth of Ss contemporary isolates ranged from 0.011 to 0.046 ppm, which fall in the baseline from soybean and non-soybean hosts from China. Concentrations of 0.834 and 834 ppm were statistically different (no sclerotia production) than the control, which showed 14.6 sclerotia and 0.066 g.</p>
					<p> </p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<title>Conclusion</title>
					<p>. The EC50 mycelial growth of <italic>F. virguliforme</italic> Iowa isolates fall in the range of previous reported for the USA. The EC50 mycelial growth of <italic>S. sclerotiorum</italic> Iowa isolates fall in the range previous reported outside the USA. Pydiflumetofen has the potential to diminish the sclerotial production but more studies are needed.</p>
				</sec>
			</abstract>
			<kwd-group xml:lang="en">
				<title>Keywords:</title>
				<kwd>EC50 mycelial growth</kwd>
				<kwd>EC50 number sclerotia</kwd>
				<kwd>EC50 dried-weight sclerotia</kwd>
				<kwd>MIC</kwd>
			</kwd-group>
			<counts>
				<fig-count count="2"/>
				<table-count count="2"/>
				<equation-count count="0"/>
				<ref-count count="28"/>
				<page-count count="0"/>
			</counts>
		</article-meta>
	</front>
		<body>
			<sec sec-type="intro">
				<title>Introduction</title>
				<p>The United States is the second-largest producer of soybean (<italic>Glycine max</italic>) globally, with Iowa serving as a key contributor in the Midwest (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">USDA-NASS, 2022</xref>). Iowa ranks as the second-highest soybean-producing state, with a yield of 15.59 million metric ton in</p>
				<p>3.97 million ha (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">USDA-NASS, 2022</xref>). Sudden death syndrome (SDS) caused by <italic>Fusarium virguliforme</italic>, and white mold (WM), caused by <italic>Sclerotinia sclerotiorum</italic>, are the second and third most impactful diseases contributing to soybean yield losses of 0.81 and 0.71 million metric ton, respectively, in the northern USA (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">CPN, 2025b</xref>).</p>
				<p>Sclerotia are fungal structures produced by members of the Sclerotiniaceae family. Disease incidence can be significantly reduced if sclerotia formation is prevented or if they are destroyed in the soil or plant residues (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Xia <italic>et al</italic>., 2019</xref>). Previous research has examined white mold sclerotia production in the field following fungicide applications (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Miorini <italic>et al</italic>., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Vieira <italic>et al</italic>., 2003</xref>). Similarly, other studies have investigated the impact of benzovindiflupyr and flusilazole fungicides on <italic>in vitro</italic> sclerotia production of WM (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Huang <italic>et al</italic>., 2019b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Lu <italic>et al</italic>., 2015</xref>).</p>
				<p>Pydiflumetofen is a second-generation fungicide from the succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor (SDHI)-(FRAC) group 7 (FRAC, 2024), known for its broad-spectrum activity against a wide range of plant pathogens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Duan <italic>et al</italic>., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Huang <italic>et al</italic>., 2019a</xref>). It has been labeled for use on soybean in the USA since 2019, both as a seed treatment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Kandel <italic>et al</italic>., 2019</xref>) and in commercial premix formulations for foliar application to manage diseases such as SDS and WM. While limited research has been conducted on fungicide sensitivity in the USA isolates of Fv and Ss, pydiflumetofen has demonstrated efficacy against <italic>Fusarium graminearum</italic> (from wheat, corn, dry bean, and soybean), <italic>Cercospora sojina</italic> and <italic>Corynespora cassiicola</italic> (from soybean) in the USA, <italic>Sclerotinia sclerotiorum</italic> from oil seed rape, cucumber, tomato, eggplant, kidney bean, pepper and pumpkin in China (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Breunig and Chilvers, 2021</xref>; Duan <italic>et al.</italic>, 2019; Huang <italic>et al</italic>., 2019a; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Neves and Bradley, 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Xu <italic>et al</italic>., 2020</xref>), <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> from tomato in China (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Li <italic>et al</italic>., 2022</xref>) and <italic>Bipolaris maydis</italic> from corn in China (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Sun <italic>et al.</italic>, 2024</xref>).</p>
				<p>The package “drc” (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Ritz <italic>et al.</italic>, 2015</xref>) was explicitly written to estimate dose-response relationships across many disciplines, included plant pathology. It is a robust package describing symmetric and asymmetric dose-response relationships, including those describing hormetic effects (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Knezevic <italic>et al.</italic>, 2007</xref>). Symmetric dose-response curve describes the relationships that can be modeled, showing symmetry around an inflection point, whereas asymmetric dose-response curves do not have this property (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Noel <italic>et al</italic>., 2018</xref>). To estimate the EC50, dose-response models generally use the following parameters: the upper asymptote, lower asymptote, and slope (Noel <italic>et al</italic>., 2018). There are then two definitions that describe the EC50: relative and absolute. The relative EC50 is the inflection point in a dose-response curve, whereas the absolute EC50 is the concentration at which 50% maximal growth occurs (more consistent with the FRAC-defined EC50; Noel <italic>et al</italic>., 2018).</p>
				<p>The objective was to estimate the absolute EC50 for mycelial growth of <italic>Fusarium virguliforme</italic> from Iowa. Additionally, to determine the absolute EC50 values for both mycelial growth and sclerotial production of <italic>Sclerotinia sclerotiorum</italic> from Iowa.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>Experimental development</title>
				<p>Media preparation. One-third strength potato dextrose agar (PDA) was prepared by dissolving 1.3 g of PDA (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI) and 1.0 g of agar (Bacto Laboratories, NSW, Australia) in 100 mL of distilled water. The medium was autoclaved for 1 hour. A stock solution of Saltro<sup>?</sup> (pydiflumetofen 41.7%, Syngenta; flowable concentrate formulated for seed treatment) at 417,000 ppm was diluted with sterile distilled water and incorporated into the PDA medium at 50 °C to achieve final concentrations of 0.0008, 0.0042, 0.0083, 0.0417, 0.0834, 0.8340, and 834 ppm through standard serial dilution. Medium without fungicide served as the control. Amended media were stirred thoroughly and poured into 10 cm diameter petri plates. For consistency, 20 mL of medium was dispensed into each plate using a sterile Falcon tube (Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA).</p>
				<p>Fungal isolates, inoculation and incubation. Monosporic isolates were isolated from roots of soybean plants exhibiting typical SDS symptoms using a modified Nash and Snyder medium by the procedure of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Cho <italic>et al</italic>. (2001</xref>). The <italic>F. virguliforme</italic> isolates were morphologically and molecularly identified by the procedure of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Chilvers and Brown- Rytlewski (2010</xref>). Isolations of <italic>S. sclerotiorum</italic> were carried out from a single sclerotium from the soybean stem with WM symptoms during the harvest season, following the procedure of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Otto-Hanson <italic>et al</italic>. (2011</xref>). The <italic>S. sclerotiorum</italic> isolates grew fast with cottony- white aerial mycelia and formed irregular sclerotia on the border of the PDA petri plate.</p>
				<p>Two isolates of <italic>F. virguliforme</italic> and three isolates of <italic>S. sclerotiorum</italic> were used in total (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 1</xref>). Historical isolates are considered isolates collected before pydiflumetofen introduction in the market (2019) (Fv1<sup>his</sup>), whereas contemporary isolates are considered isolates collected currently and after pydiflumetofen introduction in the market (2019). We were able to obtain historical isolates for <italic>F. virguliforme</italic>, but not for <italic>S. sclerotiorum</italic>. Actively growing cultures of <italic>F. virguliforme</italic> (seven days after inoculation, DAI) and <italic>S. sclerotiorum</italic> (48 hours after inoculation, HAI) on 1/3 strength PDA were used. Agar plugs (0.6 cm diameter) were taken from the colony edge and placed the center of each amended medium-plate. Plates were sealed with film parafilm<sup>?</sup> (Amcor corporate, Zürich, Switzerland) and placed in an incubator at 25 °C dark. After the incubation period (7 DAI for <italic>F. virguliforme</italic> and 48 HAI for <italic>S. sclerotiorum</italic>), plates were scanned to quantify the mycelial growth at 400 dpi with a blue background and a small ruler as a scale-without removing the parafilm<sup>?</sup>. Colony diameters (equatorial and polar) were measured using ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD), and the <italic>S. sclerotiorum</italic> plates were further kept at 25 °C dark.</p>
				<p>Sclerotia Production. These aforementioned <italic>S. sclerotiorum</italic> plates were incubated at 25</p>
				<p>°C dark for 21 days to allow sclerotia formation. All sclerotia were per plate were collected, dried in an oven at 50 °C for 48 hours, and counted and weighed, following the procedure of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Lu <italic>et al</italic>. (2015</xref>).</p>
				<p>Data Analysis. EC50 values for mycelial growth of both fungus (<italic>F. virguliforme</italic> and <italic>S. sclerotiorum</italic>) and for sclerotial production of <italic>S. sclerotiorum</italic> were estimated by fitting three models: the three-parameter log-logistic (LL.3), four-parameter log-logistic (LL.4), and four-parameter Weibull type I (W1.4) and type II (W2.4) dose-response models using the “drc” package in R (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Ritz <italic>et al</italic>., 2015</xref>). The best-fitting model was selected based on Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC), F-tests for lack-of-fit, and examination of residual</p>
				<p>variance, following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Noel <italic>et al</italic>. (2018</xref>), using the “mselect” function in the same package. All fungicide concentrations, including controls, had three replications of a media plate (experimental unit). The petri plates were incubated in a completely random design, and the experiment was performed twice. ANOVA and Fisher’s Least Significant Difference (LSD) post hoc tests were conducted using the “agricolae” package (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">de Mendiburu, 2023</xref>). All data analyses were performed in R studio version (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">R Development Core Team, 2024</xref>). The best-fit models for mycelial growth were the Weibull type II (W2.4) for Fv1 and the four-parameter log-logistic (LL.4) for Fv3. For <italic>S. sclerotiorum</italic>, the best models were W2.4 for Ss1, and Weibull type I (W1.4) for both Ss2 and Ss4 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 1</xref>). The absolute EC50 values of pydiflumetofen for mycelial growth of <italic>F. virguliforme</italic> isolates were 0.045 ppm (Fv1) and 0.048 ppm (Fv3) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 1</xref>). For <italic>S. sclerotiorum</italic>, the absolute EC50 values for</p>
				<p>mycelial growth ranged from 0.011 to 0.046 ppm (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 1</xref>).</p>
				<p>Isolate Ss2 did not produce sclerotia in the control and was therefore excluded from subsequent sclerotia analyses. The best-fit models for sclerotia number and dried-weight were LL.3 for Ss1 and Ss4. Absolute EC50 values for sclerotia number ranged from 0.004 to 0.019 ppm, and for dried-weight sclerotia ranged from 0.101 to 0.137 ppm (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 1</xref>).</p>
				<p>The historical isolate <italic>F. virguliforme</italic> Fv1 isolate (NE305) showed a lower EC50 value than the contemporary Fv3 isolate (FV-RD-0024), indicating greater sensitivity to pydiflumetofen, as expected. Notably, the highest tested concentrations (0.834 and 834 ppm) did not completely inhibit <italic>F. virguliforme</italic> mycelial growth (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">Figure 1</xref>).</p>
				<p>A significant effect of pydiflumetofen concentration on sclerotia number was observed (p &lt; 0.001). Concentrations of 0.0042, 0.0083, 0.0417, 0.0834, 0.834, and 834 ppm significantly reduced the number of sclerotia compared to the control (14.6 sclerotia). The highest concentrations, 0.834 and 834 ppm, resulted in the lowest sclerotia counts recorded</p>
				<p>(0) in the study (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">Table 2</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">Figure 2</xref>). Due to noticeable variation in both the number and size of sclerotia within the same treatment, sclerotia dried-weight was also assessed as a more consistent metric. Pydiflumetofen concentration had a significant effect on sclerotia dried- weight as well (p &lt; 0.001), with concentrations of 0.834 and 834 ppm significantly reducing sclerotia dried-weight (0 g) compared to the control (0.066 g) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">Table 2</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">Figure 2</xref>).</p>
				<p>
					<fig id="f3">
						<label>Figure 1</label>
						<caption>
							<title><italic>Fusarium virguliforme</italic> isolates on 1/3 strength PDA petri plates incubated for 7 days after inoculation (DAI) at 25 °C dark. Petri plates amended with pydiflumetofen fungicide through standard serial dilutions. A) <italic>Fusarium virguliforme</italic> isolate Fv1 (NE305); B) <italic>Fusarium virguliforme</italic> isolate Fv3 (FV-RD-0024).</title>
						</caption>
						<graphic xlink:href="2007-8080-rmfi-44-01-RMEXFIT25052-gf3.gif"/>
					</fig>
				</p>
				<p>
					<table-wrap id="t3">
						<label>Table 1</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Isolates of <italic>Fusarium virguliforme</italic> (Fv) and <italic>Sclerotinia sclerotiorum</italic> (Ss) used in the study including their background information and their absolute EC50 estimated per variable on petri plates amended with pydiflumetofen fungicide (Saltro<sup>?</sup>; Syngenta) at 0.0008, 0.0042, 0.0083, 0.0417, 0.0834, 0.8340, and 834 ppm through standard serial dilutions. The isolate Ss2 (#630) shows one model since it did not produce sclerotia in the control.</title>
						</caption>
						<table cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0">
							<thead>
								<tr>
									<th style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; border-top:1px solid #000;">Fungus</th>
									<th style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; border-top:1px solid #000;">ID</th>
									<th style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; border-top:1px solid #000;">Isolate</th>
									<th style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; border-top:1px solid #000;">EC<sub>50</sub>
 <sup>M</sup>(ppm)</th>
									<th style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; border-top:1px solid #000;">SEM</th>
									<th style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; border-top:1px solid #000;">EC<sub>50</sub>
 <sup>N</sup>(ppm)</th>
									<th style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; border-top:1px solid #000;">SE<sup>N</sup></th>
									<th style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; border-top:1px solid #000;">EC<sub>50</sub>
 <sup>D</sup>(ppm)</th>
									<th style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; border-top:1px solid #000;">SE<sup>D</sup></th>
									<th style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; border-top:1px solid #000;">Model</th>
									<th style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; border-top:1px solid #000;">Collection location</th>
									<th style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; border-top:1px solid #000;">Collection year</th>
								</tr>
							</thead>
							<tbody>
								<tr>
									<td style="font-style:italic">Fusarium virguliforme</td>
									<td>Fv1<sup>his</sup></td>
									<td>NE305 (Gongora-Canul et al., 2012) Mueller’s lab</td>
									<td>0.045</td>
									<td>0.004</td>
									<td>-</td>
									<td>-</td>
									<td>-</td>
									<td>-</td>
									<td>W2.4<sup>Md</sup></td>
									<td>Nevada</td>
									<td>2006</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td style="font-style:italic">F. virguliforme</td>
									<td>Fv3<sub>con</sub></td>
									<td>FV-RD- 0024</td>
									<td>0.048</td>
									<td>0.006</td>
									<td>-</td>
									<td>-</td>
									<td>-</td>
									<td>-</td>
									<td>LL.4<sup>Mb</sup></td>
									<td>Roland</td>
									<td>2024</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td style="font-style:italic">S. sclerotiorum</td>
									<td>Ss1</td>
									<td>Leandro’s lab WM- 2024</td>
									<td>0.011</td>
									<td>0.001</td>
									<td>0.004</td>
									<td>0.005</td>
									<td>0.101</td>
									<td>0.014</td>
									<td>W2.4<sup>Md</sup>; LL.3<sup>Na</sup>; LL.3<sup>Da</sup></td>
									<td>Unknown in IA</td>
									<td>Unknown</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td style="font-style:italic">S. sclerotiorum</td>
									<td>Ss2</td>
									<td>#630 Mueller’s lab</td>
									<td>0.046</td>
									<td>0.004</td>
									<td>-</td>
									<td>-</td>
									<td>-</td>

									<td>-</td>
									<td>W1.4<sup>Mc</sup></td>
									<td>Unknown in IA</td>
									<td>2020</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td style="font-style:italic">S. sclerotiorum</td>
									<td>Ss4</td>
									<td>WM-CO-0024</td>
									<td>0.041</td>
									<td>0.005</td>
									<td>0.019</td>
									<td>0.012</td>
									<td>0.137</td>
									<td>0.019</td>
									<td>LL.3<sup>Na</sup>; LL.3<sup>Da</sup></td>
									<td>Colo</td>
									<td>2024</td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>
						<table-wrap-foot>
							<fn id="TFN4">
								<p>hisHistorical isolate = Collected before pydiflumetofen introduction in the market; <sup>con</sup>Contemporary isolate = Collected currently and after pydiflumetofen introduction in the market; <sup>M</sup>Mycelial growth; <sup>N</sup>Number sclerotia; <sup>D</sup>Dried-weight sclerotia.</p>
							</fn>
							<fn id="TFN5">
								<p>SE = Standard Error; <sup>a</sup>Three-parameter log-logistic (symmetric curve); <sup>b</sup>Four-parameter log-logistic (symmetric curve); <sup>c</sup>Four- parameter Weibull type I (asymmetric curve); <sup>d</sup>Four-parameter Weibull type II (asymmetric curve).</p>
							</fn>
						</table-wrap-foot>
					</table-wrap>
				</p>
				<p>
					<table-wrap id="t4">
						<label>Table 2</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Average of number and dried-weight of sclerotia produced of <italic>Sclerotinia sclerotiorum</italic> isolates Ss1 (WM-2024) and Ss4 (WM-CO-0024) incubated for 21 days in darkness 25 °C. Petri plates amended with pydiflumetofen fungicide. Metrics between both isolates were combined.</title>
						</caption>
						<table cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0">
							<thead>
								<tr>
									<th style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; border-top:1px solid #000;">Concentration (ppm)</th>
									<th style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; border-top:1px solid #000;">Number sclerotia </th>
									<th style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; border-top:1px solid #000;">Groupsz </th>
									<th style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; border-top:1px solid #000;">Dried-weight sclerotia (g)</th>
									<th style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; border-top:1px solid #000;">Groupsz </th>
								</tr>
							</thead>
							<tbody>
								<tr>
									<td>0 </td>
									<td>14.600 </td>
									<td>a </td>
									<td>0.066 </td>
									<td>a </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>0.0008 </td>
									<td>10.00 </td>
									<td>ab </td>
									<td>0.071 </td>
									<td>a </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>0.0042 </td>
									<td>7.167 </td>
									<td>b </td>
									<td>0.068 </td>
									<td>a </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>0.0083 </td>
									<td>7.333 </td>
									<td>b </td>
									<td>0.064 </td>
									<td>a </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>0.0417 </td>
									<td>7.333 </td>
									<td>b </td>
									<td>0.057 </td>
									<td>a </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>0.0834 </td>
									<td>8.667 </td>
									<td>b </td>
									<td>0.051 </td>
									<td>a </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>0.834 </td>
									<td>0 </td>
									<td>c </td>
									<td>0 </td>
									<td>c </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>834 </td>
									<td>0 </td>
									<td>c </td>
									<td>0 </td>
									<td>c </td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>
						<table-wrap-foot>
							<fn id="TFN6">
								<p>zConcentrations with the same letter are not significantly different by Fisher’s Least Significant Difference (LSD) at p&lt;0.05</p>
							</fn>
						</table-wrap-foot>
					</table-wrap>
				</p>
				<p>
					<fig id="f4">
						<label>Figure 2</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Mycelial growth and sclerotia production of <italic>Sclerotinia sclerotiorum</italic> isolates petri plates incubated at 25 °C dark. Petri plates amended with pydiflumetofen fungicide serial dilutions. A) Boxplot. B) Image in which a same isolate lays on each panel, with different concentrations increase from left to right along the row. Panels B-I to B-III: Mycelial growth at 48 hours after inoculation (HAI); B-I) <italic>Sclerotinia sclerotiorum</italic> isolate Ss1 - labeled WM1 (WM-2024); B-II) <italic>Sclerotinia sclerotiorum</italic> isolate Ss2 - labeled WM2 (#630); B-III) <italic>Sclerotinia sclerotiorum</italic> isolate Ss4 - labeled WM4 (WM-CO-0024); Panel B-IV: Sclerotia production at 21 days of incubation (DAI); B-IV) <italic>Sclerotinia sclerotiorum</italic> isolate Ss4 (WM-CO-0024).</title>
						</caption>
						<graphic xlink:href="2007-8080-rmfi-44-01-RMEXFIT25052-gf4.gif"/>
					</fig>
				</p>
				<p>Pydiflumetofen reduced the mycelial growth of <italic>Fusarium virguliforme</italic>. The EC50 mycelial growth values for <italic>F. virguliforme</italic> in this study (0.045-0.048 ppm) fall within the previously reported range of 0.011-0.4602 ppm from soybean isolates in the USA (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Hamilton <italic>et al</italic>., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Olaya <italic>et al</italic>., 2021</xref>). The best-fitting models for mycelial growth were four-parameter types: The Weibull type II (asymmetric) and the log-logistic (symmetric) distributions. The use of the Weibull type II model is consistent with Hamilton <italic>et al</italic>. (2024), who studied the same fungus and active ingredient. However, their maximum</p>
				<p>tested concentration was 100 ppm, whereas this study used concentrations up to 834 ppm. This difference may be attributed to our use of a commercial formulation, while <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Hamilton <italic>et al</italic>. (2024</xref>) used the pure active ingredient. Nevertheless, the highest concentrations tested (0.834 and 834 ppm) in this study cannot be considered the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC).</p>
				<p>The historical isolate Fv1 (NE205), collected in 2006-prior to the introduction of pydiflumetofen in the USA-and the contemporary isolate Fv3 (FV-RD-0024) had EC50 values of 0.045 and 0.048 ppm, respectively. Both values fall within the baseline range of 0.04-0.24 ppm for unexposed isolates in the USA (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Hamilton <italic>et al</italic>., 2024</xref>).</p>
				<p>Pydiflumetofen also had an effect on the mycelial growth of <italic>Sclerotinia sclerotiorum</italic>. The EC50 values obtained in this study were within the baseline ranges previously reported: 0.0058-0.09 ppm (soybean isolates; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Duan <italic>et al</italic>., 2019</xref>) and 0.0015-0.0350 ppm (non- soybean isolates from six different crops; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Huang <italic>et al</italic>., 2019a</xref>), both from China. However, it is worth noting that Huang <italic>et al</italic>. (2019a) used broth media for <italic>in vitro</italic> testing, while our study used solid media. The best fit models for <italic>S. sclerotiorum</italic> mycelial growth were the W1.4 and W2.4 distributions (asymmetric), but these model types were not reported in previous studies using this fungus and fungicide, limiting direct comparisons.</p>
				<p>In addition to inhibiting mycelial growth, pydiflumetofen significantly reduced sclerotia production in <italic>S. sclerotiorum</italic>. The EC50 values for sclerotia number and dried-weight (0.004-0.019 ppm and 0.101-0.137 ppm, respectively) overlap with the ranges reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Gao <italic>et al</italic>. (2020</xref>) in China for non-soybean baseline isolates (mean EC50 values of 0.023 ppm for number and 0.003 ppm for dried-weight). In this study, sclerotia number was significantly reduced starting at 0.0042 ppm, while sclerotia dried-weight was significantly reduced starting at 0.834 ppm. These results are consistent with previous findings that concentrations between 0.2 and 0.8 ppm significantly reduced both the number and dried- weight of sclerotia when using benzovindiflupyr, another second-generation SDHI fungicide (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Huang <italic>et al</italic>., 2019b</xref>). Based on our results, the sclerotial inhibitory concentration <italic>in vitro</italic> appears to be 0.834 ppm.</p>
				<p>The EC50 values for mycelial growth of <italic>Fusarium virguliforme</italic> isolates from Iowa fall within the previously reported range for the USA soybean isolates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Hamilton <italic>et al</italic>., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Olaya <italic>et al</italic>., 2021</xref>). Similarly, EC50 values for <italic>Sclerotinia sclerotiorum</italic> isolates from Iowa are consistent with those reported for isolates from outside the USA (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Duan <italic>et al</italic>., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Huang <italic>et al</italic>., 2019a</xref>). These findings suggest that pydiflumetofen has potential to reduce sclerotia production, an important survival structure in the disease cycle of <italic>S. sclerotiorum</italic>. Therefore, additional studies under field conditions (<italic>in planta</italic>) are warranted to evaluate its effectiveness in disrupting disease progression by targeting sclerotia formation. Commercial fungicide formulations containing this active ingredient (7%) in mixture with more active ingredients, are currently labeled for foliar application on soybean to manage</p>
				<p><italic>S. sclerotiorum</italic> in the USA (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">CPN, 2025a</xref>).</p>
			</sec>
			<sec sec-type="conclusions">
				<title>Conclusions</title>
				<p>The EC50 mycelial growth of <italic>F. virguliforme</italic> Iowa isolates fall in the range of previous reported for the USA. The EC50 mycelial growth of <italic>S. sclerotiorum</italic> Iowa isolates fall in the range previous reported outside the USA. Pydiflumetofen has the potential to diminish the sclerotial production but more studies are needed. This study did not assess the environmental or non-target effects of pydiflumetofen, which should be addressed in future research. To our knowledge, this is the first report estimating the EC50 of pydiflumetofen</p>
				<p>on both mycelial growth and sclerotia production of <italic>S. sclerotiorum</italic> soybean isolates from the USA.</p>
			</sec>
		</body>
		<back>
			<ack>
				<title>Limitations</title>
				<p>This fungicide sensitivity study was based on a limited number of fungal isolates. As such, caution should be exercised when extrapolating these results to broader populations. A larger sample size for future studies would strengthen conclusions and provide more robust baseline data for resistance monitoring.</p>
				<p>Conflicts interest</p>
				<p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this research.</p>
				<p>Funding</p>
				<p>This work was partially supported by the USDA Hatch Project: IOW04108 - Crop Health and Disease Management and the soybean checkoff through the United Soybean Board.</p>
				<p>Author contributions</p>
				<p>Conception and conceptualization: Nieto-Lopez and Mueller; Methodology: Nieto- Lopez, Bierl, Chang-Villatoro, Joshi, and González-Acuña; Software: Nieto-Lopez; Validation: Nieto-Lopez and Parbati Joshi; Formal analysis: Nieto-Lopez; Investigation: Nieto-Lopez; Resources: Mueller; Data curation: Nieto-Lopez; Writing-original draft: Nieto-Lopez and Gonzalez- González-Acuña; Writing-review and editing: Mueller; Visualization: Nieto-Lopez; Supervision: Joshi; Project administration: Nieto-Lopez; Funding acquisition: Mueller.</p>
			</ack>
		<ref-list>
			<title>Referencias</title>
			<ref id="B1">
				<mixed-citation>Breunig M and Chilvers MI. 2021. Baseline sensitivity of <italic>Fusarium graminearum</italic> from wheat, corn, dry bean and soybean to pydiflumetofen in Michigan, USA. Crop Protection 140: 105419. 10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105419</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Breunig</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Chilvers</surname>
							<given-names>MI.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2021</year>
					<article-title>Baseline sensitivity of Fusarium graminearum from wheat, corn, dry bean and soybean to pydiflumetofen in Michigan, USA</article-title>
					<source>Crop Protection</source>
					<volume>140</volume>
					<fpage>105419</fpage>
					<lpage>105419</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105419</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B2">
				<mixed-citation>Chilvers MI and Brown-Rytlewski DE. 2010. First report and confirmed distribution of soybean Sudden death syndrome caused by <italic>Fusarium virguliforme</italic> in southern Michigan. Plant Disease 94 : 1164-1164. 10.1094/PDIS-94-9-1164B</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Chilvers</surname>
							<given-names>MI</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Brown-Rytlewski</surname>
							<given-names>DE.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2010</year>
					<article-title>First report and confirmed distribution of soybean Sudden death syndrome caused by Fusarium virguliforme in southern Michigan</article-title>
					<source>Plant Disease</source>
					<volume>94</volume>
					<fpage>1164</fpage>
					<lpage>1164</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-94-9-1164B</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B3">
				<mixed-citation>Cho JH, Rupe JC, Cummings MS and Gbur EE Jr. 2001. Isolation and identification of <italic>Fusarium solani</italic> f. sp. <italic>glycines</italic> from soil on modified Nash and Snyder’s medium. Plant Disease 85: 256-260. 10.1094/PDIS.2001.85.3.256</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Cho</surname>
							<given-names>JH</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Rupe</surname>
							<given-names>JC</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Cummings</surname>
							<given-names>MS</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gbur</surname>
							<given-names>EE Jr.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2001</year>
					<article-title>Isolation and identification of Fusarium solani f. sp. glycines from soil on modified Nash and Snyder’s medium</article-title>
					<source>Plant Disease</source>
					<volume>85</volume>
					<fpage>256</fpage>
					<lpage>260</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS.2001.85.3.256</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B4">
				<mixed-citation>CPN, Crop Protection Network. 2025a. Fungicide Efficacy for Control of Soybean Foliar Diseases. CPN-1019. 10.31274/cpn-20190620-014 (retrieved August 2025)</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<collab>CPN, Crop Protection Network</collab>
					</person-group>
					<year>2025</year>
					<article-title>Fungicide Efficacy for Control of Soybean Foliar Diseases</article-title>
					<source>CPN-1019</source>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31274/cpn-20190620-014</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B5">
				<mixed-citation>CPN, Crop Protection Network. 2025b. Soybean Disease Loss Estimates from the United States and Ontario, Canada — 2024. CPN-1018-24. 10.31274/cpn-20250317-1 (retrieved August 2025)</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<collab>CPN, Crop Protection Network</collab>
					</person-group>
					<year>2025</year>
					<source>Soybean Disease Loss Estimates from the United States and Ontario, Canada — 2024. CPN-1018-24</source>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31274/cpn-20250317-1</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B6">
				<mixed-citation>de Mendiburu F. 2023. Agricolae: Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. R package version 1.3-7. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=agricolae">https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=agricolae</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="webpage">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>de Mendiburu</surname>
							<given-names>F.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2023</year>
					<source>Agricolae: Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. R package version 1.3-7</source>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=agricolae">https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=agricolae</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B7">
				<mixed-citation>Duan Y, Xiu Q, Li H, Li T, Wang J, et al. 2019. Pharmacological characteristics and control efficacy of a novel SDHI fungicide pydiflumetofen against <italic>Sclerotinia sclerotiorum</italic>. Plant Disease 103 : 77-82. 10.1094/PDIS-05-18-0763-RE</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Duan</surname>
							<given-names>Y</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Xiu</surname>
							<given-names>Q</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Li</surname>
							<given-names>H</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Li</surname>
							<given-names>T</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2019</year>
					<article-title>Pharmacological characteristics and control efficacy of a novel SDHI fungicide pydiflumetofen against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum</article-title>
					<source>Plant Disease</source>
					<volume>103</volume>
					<fpage>77</fpage>
					<lpage>82</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-05-18-0763-RE</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B8">
				<mixed-citation>Gao Y, He L, Zhu J, Cheng J, Li B, et al. 2020. The relationship between features enabling SDHI fungicide binding to the Sc‐Sdh complex and its inhibitory activity against <italic>Sclerotinia sclerotiorum</italic>. Pest Management Science 76 : 2799-2808. 10.1002/ps.5827</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Gao</surname>
							<given-names>Y</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>He</surname>
							<given-names>L</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zhu</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Cheng</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Li</surname>
							<given-names>B</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2020</year>
					<article-title>The relationship between features enabling SDHI fungicide binding to the Sc‐Sdh complex and its inhibitory activity against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum</article-title>
					<source>Pest Management Science</source>
					<volume>76</volume>
					<fpage>2799</fpage>
					<lpage>2808</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ps.5827</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B9">
				<mixed-citation>Gongora-Canul C, Nutter Jr. FW and Leandro LF. 2012. Temporal dynamics of root and foliar severity of soybean Sudden death syndrome at different inoculum densities. European Journal of Plant Pathology 132 : 71-79. 10.1007/s10658-011-9849-4</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Gongora-Canul</surname>
							<given-names>C</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Nutter</surname>
							<given-names>FW</given-names>
							<suffix>Jr.</suffix>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Leandro</surname>
							<given-names>LF.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2012</year>
					<article-title>Temporal dynamics of root and foliar severity of soybean Sudden death syndrome at different inoculum densities</article-title>
					<source>European Journal of Plant Pathology</source>
					<volume>132</volume>
					<fpage>71</fpage>
					<lpage>79</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10658-011-9849-4</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B10">
				<mixed-citation>Hamilton R, Jacobs JL, McCoy AG, Kelly HM, Bradley CA, et al. 2024. Multistate sensitivity monitoring of <italic>Fusarium virguliforme</italic> to the SDHI fungicides fluopyram and pydiflumetofen in the United States. Plant Disease 108 : 1602-1611. 10.1094/PDIS-11-23-2465-RE</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Hamilton</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Jacobs</surname>
							<given-names>JL</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>McCoy</surname>
							<given-names>AG</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kelly</surname>
							<given-names>HM</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bradley</surname>
							<given-names>CA</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2024</year>
					<article-title>Multistate sensitivity monitoring of Fusarium virguliforme to the SDHI fungicides fluopyram and pydiflumetofen in the United States</article-title>
					<source>Plant Disease</source>
					<volume>108</volume>
					<fpage>1602</fpage>
					<lpage>1611</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-11-23-2465-RE</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B11">
				<mixed-citation>Huang XP, Luo J, Li BX, Song YF, Mu W, et al. 2019a. Bioactivity, physiological characteristics and efficacy of the SDHI fungicide pydiflumetofen against <italic>Sclerotinia sclerotiorum</italic>. Pesticide Biochemistry And Physiology 160: 70-78. 10.1016/j.pestbp.2019.06.017</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Huang</surname>
							<given-names>XP</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Luo</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Li</surname>
							<given-names>BX</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Song</surname>
							<given-names>YF</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mu</surname>
							<given-names>W</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2019</year>
					<article-title>Bioactivity, physiological characteristics and efficacy of the SDHI fungicide pydiflumetofen against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum</article-title>
					<source>Pesticide Biochemistry And Physiology</source>
					<volume>160</volume>
					<fpage>70</fpage>
					<lpage>78</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pestbp.2019.06.017</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B12">
				<mixed-citation>Huang XP, Luo J, Song YF, Li BX, Mu W, et al. 2019b. Favorable bioactivity of the SDHI fungicide benzovindiflupyr against <italic>Sclerotinia sclerotiorum</italic> mycelial growth, sclerotial production, and myceliogenic and carpogenic germination of sclerotia. Plant Disease 103 : 1613-1620. 10.1094/PDIS-05-18-0729-RE</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Huang</surname>
							<given-names>XP</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Luo</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Song</surname>
							<given-names>YF</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Li</surname>
							<given-names>BX</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mu</surname>
							<given-names>W</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2019</year>
					<article-title>Favorable bioactivity of the SDHI fungicide benzovindiflupyr against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum mycelial growth, sclerotial production, and myceliogenic and carpogenic germination of sclerotia</article-title>
					<source>Plant Disease</source>
					<volume>103</volume>
					<fpage>1613</fpage>
					<lpage>1620</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-05-18-0729-RE</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B13">
				<mixed-citation>Kandel YR, Bradley CA, Chilvers MI, Mathew FM, Tenuta AU, et al. 2019. Effect of seed treatment and foliar crop protection products on Sudden death syndrome and yield of soybean. Plant Disease 103 : 1712-1720. 10.1094/PDIS-12-18-2199-RE</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Kandel</surname>
							<given-names>YR</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bradley</surname>
							<given-names>CA</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Chilvers</surname>
							<given-names>MI</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mathew</surname>
							<given-names>FM</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Tenuta</surname>
							<given-names>AU</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2019</year>
					<article-title>Effect of seed treatment and foliar crop protection products on Sudden death syndrome and yield of soybean</article-title>
					<source>Plant Disease</source>
					<volume>103</volume>
					<fpage>1712</fpage>
					<lpage>1720</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-12-18-2199-RE</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B14">
				<mixed-citation>Knezevic SZ, Streibig JC and Ritz C. 2007. Utilizing R software package for dose-response studies: The concept and data analysis. Weed Technology 21 : 840-848.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Knezevic</surname>
							<given-names>SZ</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Streibig</surname>
							<given-names>JC</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ritz</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2007</year>
					<article-title>Utilizing R software package for dose-response studies: The concept and data analysis</article-title>
					<source>Weed Technology</source>
					<volume>21</volume>
					<fpage>840</fpage>
					<lpage>848</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B15">
				<mixed-citation>Lu XM, Zhu ZQ, Di YL and Zhu FX. 2015. Baseline sensitivity and toxic action of flusilazole to <italic>Sclerotinia sclerotiorum</italic>. Crop Protection 78: 92-98. 10.1016/j.cropro.2015.08.022</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Lu</surname>
							<given-names>XM</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zhu</surname>
							<given-names>ZQ</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Di</surname>
							<given-names>YL</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zhu</surname>
							<given-names>FX.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<article-title>Baseline sensitivity and toxic action of flusilazole to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum</article-title>
					<source>Crop Protection</source>
					<volume>78</volume>
					<fpage>92</fpage>
					<lpage>98</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cropro.2015.08.022</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B16">
				<mixed-citation>Li X, Gao X, Hu S, Hao X, Li G, et al. 2022. Resistance to pydiflumetofen in <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic>: Risk assessment and detection of point mutations in sdh genes that confer resistance. Pest Management Science 78 : 1448-1456. 10.1002/ps.6762</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Li</surname>
							<given-names>X</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gao</surname>
							<given-names>X</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hu</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hao</surname>
							<given-names>X</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Li</surname>
							<given-names>G</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2022</year>
					<article-title>Resistance to pydiflumetofen in Botrytis cinerea: Risk assessment and detection of point mutations in sdh genes that confer resistance</article-title>
					<source>Pest Management Science</source>
					<volume>78</volume>
					<fpage>1448</fpage>
					<lpage>1456</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ps.6762</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B17">
				<mixed-citation>Miorini TJ, Raetano CG and Everhart SE. 2017. Control of White mold of dry bean and residual activity of fungicides applied by chemigation. Crop Protection 94: 192-202. 10.1016/j.cropro.2016.12.023</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Miorini</surname>
							<given-names>TJ</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Raetano</surname>
							<given-names>CG</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Everhart</surname>
							<given-names>SE.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2017</year>
					<article-title>Control of White mold of dry bean and residual activity of fungicides applied by chemigation</article-title>
					<source>Crop Protection</source>
					<volume>94</volume>
					<fpage>192</fpage>
					<lpage>202</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cropro.2016.12.023</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B18">
				<mixed-citation>Neves DL and Bradley CA. 2021. Baseline sensitivity of <italic>Cercospora sojina</italic> and <italic>Corynespora cassiicola</italic> to pydiflumetofen. Crop Protection 147: 105461. 10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105461</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Neves</surname>
							<given-names>DL</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bradley</surname>
							<given-names>CA.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2021</year>
					<article-title>Baseline sensitivity of Cercospora sojina and Corynespora cassiicola to pydiflumetofen</article-title>
					<source>Crop Protection</source>
					<volume>147</volume>
					<fpage>105461</fpage>
					<lpage>105461</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105461</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B19">
				<mixed-citation>Noel ZA, Wang J and Chilvers MI. 2018. Significant influence of EC50 estimation by model choice and EC50 type. Plant Disease 102 : 708-714. 10.1094/PDIS-06-17-0873-SR</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Noel</surname>
							<given-names>ZA</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Chilvers</surname>
							<given-names>MI.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2018</year>
					<article-title>Significant influence of EC50 estimation by model choice and EC50 type</article-title>
					<source>Plant Disease</source>
					<volume>102</volume>
					<fpage>708</fpage>
					<lpage>714</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-06-17-0873-SR</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B20">
				<mixed-citation>Olaya G, Linley R and Edlebeck K. 2021. Pydiflumetofen Sensitivity of <italic>Fusarium virguliforme</italic> Isolates Causing Sudden Death on Soybeans. <italic>In</italic>: Plant Health Meeting, Virtual meeting, Phytopathology 111 : 159-159. Amer Phytopathological Soc.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Olaya</surname>
							<given-names>G</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Linley</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Edlebeck</surname>
							<given-names>K.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<month>10</month>
					<year>2021</year>
					<chapter-title>Pydiflumetofen Sensitivity of Fusarium virguliforme Isolates Causing Sudden Death on Soybeans</chapter-title>
					<source>Plant Health Meeting, Virtual meeting, Phytopathology</source>
					<volume>111</volume>
					<fpage>159</fpage>
					<lpage>159</lpage>
					<publisher-name>Amer Phytopathological Soc</publisher-name>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B21">
				<mixed-citation>Otto-Hanson L, Steadman JR, Higgins R and Eskridge KM. 2011. Variation in <italic>Sclerotinia sclerotiorum</italic> bean isolates from multisite resistance screening locations. Plant Disease 95 : 1370-1377. 10.1094/PDIS-11-10-0865</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Otto-Hanson</surname>
							<given-names>L</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Steadman</surname>
							<given-names>JR</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Higgins</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Eskridge</surname>
							<given-names>KM.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2011</year>
					<article-title>Variation in Sclerotinia sclerotiorum bean isolates from multisite resistance screening locations</article-title>
					<source>Plant Disease</source>
					<volume>95</volume>
					<fpage>1370</fpage>
					<lpage>1377</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-11-10-0865</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B22">
				<mixed-citation>Ritz C, Baty F, Streibig JC and Gerhard D. 2015. Dose-response analysis using R. PloS one 10 : e0146021. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146021 </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Ritz</surname>
							<given-names>C</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Baty</surname>
							<given-names>F</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Streibig</surname>
							<given-names>JC</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gerhard</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<article-title>Dose-response analysis using R</article-title>
					<source>PloS one</source>
					<volume>10</volume>
					<elocation-id>e0146021</elocation-id>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146021</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B23">
				<mixed-citation>R Development Core Team. 2024. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.R-project.org/">https://www.R-project.org/</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<collab>R Development Core Team</collab>
					</person-group>
					<year>2024</year>
					<source>R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing</source>
					<publisher-name>R Foundation for Statistical Computing</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Vienna, Austria</publisher-loc>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.R-project.org/">https://www.R-project.org/</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B24">
				<mixed-citation>Sun Y, Kun W, Bingyun Y, Junpeng Y, Bing L, et al. 2024. Anti-fungal activity of a novel succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor pydiflumetofen against <italic>Bipolaris maydis</italic>. Crop Protection 178: 106570. 10.1016/j.cropro.2023.106570</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Sun</surname>
							<given-names>Y</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kun</surname>
							<given-names>W</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bingyun</surname>
							<given-names>Y</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Junpeng</surname>
							<given-names>Y</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bing</surname>
							<given-names>L</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2024</year>
					<article-title>Anti-fungal activity of a novel succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor pydiflumetofen against Bipolaris maydis</article-title>
					<source>Crop Protection</source>
					<volume>178</volume>
					<fpage>106570</fpage>
					<lpage>106570</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cropro.2023.106570</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B25">
				<mixed-citation>USDA-NASS. 2022. Crop Production Annual Summary. United State Department of Agriculture-National Agricultural Statistics Service. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://usda.library.cornell.edu/concern/publications/k3569432s">https://usda.library.cornell.edu/concern/publications/k3569432s</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<collab>USDA-NASS</collab>
					</person-group>
					<year>2022</year>
					<source>Crop Production Annual Summary</source>
					<publisher-name>United State Department of Agriculture-National Agricultural Statistics Service</publisher-name>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://usda.library.cornell.edu/concern/publications/k3569432s">https://usda.library.cornell.edu/concern/publications/k3569432s</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B26">
				<mixed-citation>Vieira RF, Pinto CM and Paula Júnior TJD. 2003. Chemigation with benomyl and fluazinam and their fungicidal effects in soil for White mold control on dry beans. Fitopatologia Brasileira 28: 245-250. 10.1590/S0100-41582003000300004</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Vieira</surname>
							<given-names>RF</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pinto</surname>
							<given-names>CM</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Paula</surname>
							<given-names>TJD.</given-names>
							<suffix>Júnior</suffix>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2003</year>
					<article-title>Chemigation with benomyl and fluazinam and their fungicidal effects in soil for White mold control on dry beans</article-title>
					<source>Fitopatologia Brasileira</source>
					<volume>28</volume>
					<fpage>245</fpage>
					<lpage>250</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/S0100-41582003000300004</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B27">
				<mixed-citation>Xu J, Jia W, Hu C, Nie M, Ming J, et al. 2020. Selenium as a potential fungicide could protect oilseed rape leaves from <italic>Sclerotinia sclerotiorum</italic> infection. Environmental Pollution 257: 113495. 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113495</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Xu</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Jia</surname>
							<given-names>W</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hu</surname>
							<given-names>C</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Nie</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ming</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2020</year>
					<article-title>Selenium as a potential fungicide could protect oilseed rape leaves from Sclerotinia sclerotiorum infection</article-title>
					<source>Environmental Pollution</source>
					<volume>257</volume>
					<fpage>113495</fpage>
					<lpage>113495</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113495</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B28">
				<mixed-citation>Xia S, Xu Y, Hoy R, Zhang J, Qin L, et al. 2019. The notorious soilborne pathogenic fungus <italic>Sclerotinia sclerotiorum</italic>: An update on genes studied with mutant analysis. Pathogens 9 : 27. 10.3390/pathogens9010027</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Xia</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Xu</surname>
							<given-names>Y</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hoy</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zhang</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Qin</surname>
							<given-names>L</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2019</year>
					<article-title>The notorious soilborne pathogenic fungus Sclerotinia sclerotiorum: An update on genes studied with mutant analysis</article-title>
					<source>Pathogens</source>
					<volume>9</volume>
					<fpage>27</fpage>
					<lpage>27</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/pathogens9010027</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
		</ref-list>
	</back>
</article>