Parasitic behavior of Nacobbus aberrans populations from different geographical origin in tomato plants

Mireya Palacios-Alcántara, Nahum Marban-Mendoza, Calixto Leopoldo Carrillo-Fonseca, Jesús Alberto Acuña-Soto, Anselmo de Jesús Cabrera-Hidalgo

Abstract


The parasitic behavior of eight populations of N. aberrans from different geographical origin on tomato plants cv Miroma was evaluated. Tomato plants 29 days old were transplanted in pots previously inoculated with 0.5 g of galls from each population of nematode. Inoculated plants and control plants were kept for 45 days in a greenhouse. After transplanting (dat), three evaluations of penetration and invasion of juveniles were made at 15, 30 and 45 dat. The results showed that at 15 dat, the populations of Romita, Tetela and Chapingo presented the highest penetration and invasion rates with 58, 50 and 50 juveniles/g of root, respectively. At 30 dat, only the Silao population increased its penetration with 66 juveniles/g root, while the rest of the populations showed a significant decrease in their penetration rates. At the end of the experiment, the number of juveniles had increased, causing root swelling in the plants, mainly in those that were inoculated with the populations of Romita (158 juveniles/g of root) and Tetela (102 juveniles/g of root). In conclusion, there are clear differences in the behavior of the populations of N. aberrans in terms of fertility, penetration capacity and invasion of the root system in tomato plants, depending on their geographical origin.


Keywords


False root-knot nematode; parasitic hability; juveniles; penetration; Solanum lycopersicum

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahuja A and Singh SV. 2020. Diagnosis of plant-parasitic nematodes using loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP): A review. Crop Protection 147: pp. 105459 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105459

Byrd DWJr, Kirkpatrick T y Barker KR. 1983. An improved technique for clearing and staining tissues for detection of nematodes. Journal of Nematology 15(1): 142-143. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2618249/pdf/142.pdf

Cabrera-Hidalgo AJ, Marbán-Mendoza N, Valdovinos-Ponce G y Valadez-Moctezuma E. 2015. Genetic variability and phylogenetic analyses of Nacobbus aberrans sensu lato populations by molecular markers. Nematropica 45(2): 263-278. https://journals.flvc.org/nematropica/article/view/87387

Cristóbal-Alejo J, Cid del Prado IV, Marbán-Mendoza N, Sánchez GP, Mora-Aguilera G y Manzanilla-López RH. 2001. Sobrevivencia de estadios biológicos de Nacobbus aberrans en condiciones de campo. Nematropica 31(2): 229-235. https://journals.flvc.org/nematropica/article/view/69628

Evans AAF y Perry RN. 2009. Survival mechanisms, pp. 201-222. En: Perry, R. N., Moens, M., and Starr, J. L. (eds.). Root-knot nematodes. CAB International. Wallingford, Oxon. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845934927.0201

FAOSTAT, Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura. 2021. Cultivos. https://www.fao.org/faostat/es/#data/QC (consulta marzo 2021).

Fernández M y Ortega J. 1982. Comportamiento de las poblaciones de nematodos fitoparásitos en plátano enano Cavendish. Ciencias de la Agricultura 13: 7-17.

Huang SP y Pereira AC. 1994. Influence of inoculum density, host, and low temperature period on delayed hatch of Meloidogyne javanica eggs. Journal of Nematology 26(1): 72-75. https://journals.flvc.org/jon/article/view/66604/0

Inserra, R. N., Griffin G. D. y Anderson J. L. 1985. The false root-knot nematode Nacobbus aberrans. Research Bulletin, Utah Agricultural Experimental Station No. 510. 14 p.

Jones JT, Haegeman A, Danchin EGJ, Gaur HS, Kelder J, Jones MGK, Kikuchi T, Manzanilla-López RH, Palomares-Rius JE, Wesemael WML y Perry RN. 2013. Top 10 plant-parasitic nematodes in molecular plant pathology. Molecular Plant Pathology 14(9): 946-961. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12057

McSorley R. 2003. Adaptations of nematodes to environmental extremes. Florida Entomologist 86(2): 138-142. https://doi.org/10.1653/0015-4040(2003)086[0138:AONTEE]2.0.CO;2

Manzanilla-López RH. 1997. Studies on the characterisation and bionomics of Nacobbus aberrans (Thorne, 1935) Thorne & Allen, 1944 (Nematoda: Pratylenchidae). Ph. D. Thesis. University of Reading, U.K. 395 p.

Manzanilla-López RH, Costilla MA, Doucet M, Inserra RN, Lehman PS, Cid del Prado-Vera I, Souza RM y Evans K. 2002. The genus Nacobbus Thorne & Allen, 1944 (Nematoda: Pratylenchidae): systematics, distribution, biology and management. Nematropica 32(2): 149-227. https://journals.flvc.org/nematropica/article/view/69655

Martínez-Fuentes R, Tovar-Soto A y Torres-Coronel R. 2010. Penetración y Establecimiento de Nacobbus aberrans [(Thorne 1933) Thorne y Allen), 1944] Población Chapingo en Cultivares de Frijol (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Revista Mexicana de Fitopatología 28(1): 61-63. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0185-33092010000100007

Perry RN. 1997. Plant signals in nematode hatching and attraction. pp. 38-50. En: Fenoll C., Grundler F.M.W., Ohl S.A. (eds) Cellular and Molecular Aspects of Plant-Nematode Interactions. Developments in Plant Pathology, vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5596-0_4

Prasad SK y Webster JM. 1967. Effect of temperature on the rate of development of Nacobbus serendipiticus in excised tomato roots. Nematologica 13(1): 85-90. https://doi.org/10.1163/187529267X00968

SIAP-SIACON, Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera-Sistema de Información Agroalimentaria de Consulta. 2021. Modulo Agrícola Estatal. https://www.gob.mx/siap/documentos/siacon-ng-161430 (consulta marzo, 2021).

Sikora EJ y Noel GR. 1996. Hatch and emergence of Heterodera glycines in root leachate from resistant and susceptible soybean cultivars. Journal of Nematology 28(4): 501-509. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19277168/

Souza RM y Baldwin JG. 2000. Differential behaviour of the survival stages of Nacobbus aberrans (Nemata: Pratylenchidae) under sub-optimal environments. Nematologica 2(2): 211-215. https://doi.org/10.1163/156854100508944

Umesh KC. 1994. Competition between the plant-parasitic nematodes Pratylenchus neglectus and Meloidogyne chitwoodi. Journal of Nematology 26(3): 286-295. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2619500/pdf/286.pdf

Van Gundy SD. 1985. Ecology of Meloidogyne spp. -emphasis on environmental factors affecting survival and pathogenicity. pp. 177-182. En: Sasser J. N., and Carter C. C. (eds.). An Advanced Treatise of Meloidogyne. Vol. I. Biology and Control. Carolina State University Graphics, Raleigh, NC.

Zheng L y Ferris H. 1991. Four types of dormancy exhibited by eggs of Heterodera schachtii. Revue de Nématologie 14(3): 419-426. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.539.4099&rep=rep1&type=pdf




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18781/R.MEX.FIT.2203-2

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.