RMF Logo

Article filters

Search Papers:

For searching before 2024 see Archive (2000-2023)
  • Vol. 2026, 44(1)
  • Phytopathological Note

Comparative in vitro and in vivo study of anthracnose in papaya (Carica papaya) caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides and Colletotrichum truncatum

By Yuridia Rodríguez González, Ernesto Castañeda Hidalgo*, Celerino Robles, Gisela Margarita Santiago Martínez, Verónica Martínez Gallegos, Salvador Lozano Trejo

*Corresponding Author.

Received: 23/September/2025 – Published: 16/December/2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18781/R.MEX.FIT.2509-3

  • PDF
  • HTML
  • XML

Abstract Background/Objective. Globally, Mexico is the leading exporter of fresh papaya, with Oaxaca being the largest national producer. However, anthracnose, a disease caused by species of the Colletotrichum spp. complex, can affect up to 40% of production. The objective of the research was to identify the causal agent of anthracnose in producing localities of Oaxaca and to evaluate the effectiveness of different products (chemical and biological) in reducing the severity of this disease under in vitro and in vivo conditions.

Experimental Development. A sampling of fruits with anthracnose lesions was carried out at 12 sites in the municipalities of Villa de Tututepec de Melchor Ocampo and Santa María Huazolotitlán, Costa de Oaxaca. The isolates were identified by morphological analysis and microcultures. Three chemical fungicides (prochloraz, benomyl and azoxystrobin) and three biological fungicides (Bacillus subtilis, Trichoderma sp. and Bacillus cereus) were evaluated in vitro and in vivo, with a completely randomized design, with Duncan's mean comparison (p ≤ 0.005).

Results. Colletotrichum gloeosporioides and C. truncatum were identified as being associated with anthracnose. In in vitro tests, prochloraz was the most effective treatment, with inhibition values of 86.42% against C. truncatum and 48.66% against C. gloeosporioides, achieving an overall effectiveness of 75%. Likewise, B. subtilis and Trichoderma sp. showed high in vitro efficacy (≥ 70%), demonstrating a potential for biological control under laboratory conditions.

Conclusions. Colletotrichum gloeosporioides (in 66.7% of the sampled sites) and C. truncatum (in 33.3% of the sampled sites) were confirmed as the cause of anthracnose in papaya in the Costa region of Oaxaca. In in vivo tests, prochloraz was the most effective treatment with 75% effectiveness against C. truncatum and 50% against C. gloeosporioides. Benomyl showed intermediate effectiveness, with 65% against C. truncatum and 45% against C. gloeosporioides, with severities of 60-73%. Biological treatments showed low effectiveness: Trichoderma sp. (35 and 15%) and B. subtilis (25 and 30%) for C. gloeosporioides and C. truncatum, respectively, with high severities between 73 and 93%. B. cereus and azoxystrobin showed intermediate behavior, with 30-40% effectiveness and severities of 75-86%. Overall, the results indicate that systemic fungicides outperformed biological agents by more than 30-40% in effectiveness, while biological agents showed less than 35% control and greater than 80% severity, confirming their limited performance in post-harvest.

Keywords: Biocontrol, Carica papaya, Colletotrichum spp., Synthetic pesticide

Table 1. Evaluated concentrations of chemical fungicides and biological agents used against <em>Colletotrichum gloeosporioides</em> and <em>C. truncatum</em> in papaya fruits.
Table 1. Evaluated concentrations of chemical fungicides and biological agents used against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides and C. truncatum in papaya fruits.
Table 2. Visual and quantitative scale for classifying anthracnose damage in papaya fruits according to lesion area.
Table 2. Visual and quantitative scale for classifying anthracnose damage in papaya fruits according to lesion area.
Table 3. Analysis of variance of the effect of different products on lesions in <em>Carica papaya</em> var. Maradol fruits caused by <em>C. truncatum</em> 10 days after inoculation.
Table 3. Analysis of variance of the effect of different products on lesions in Carica papaya var. Maradol fruits caused by C. truncatum 10 days after inoculation.
Table 4. Analysis of variance of the effect of different chemical and biological products on lesions in <em>Carica papaya</em> var. Maradol fruits caused by <em>C. gloeosporioides</em>, 10 days after inoculation.
Table 4. Analysis of variance of the effect of different chemical and biological products on lesions in Carica papaya var. Maradol fruits caused by C. gloeosporioides, 10 days after inoculation.
Table 5. Effect of different chemical and biological products on lesions in <em>Carica papaya</em> var. Maradol fruits caused by <em>C. truncatum,</em> 10 days after inoculation.
Table 5. Effect of different chemical and biological products on lesions in Carica papaya var. Maradol fruits caused by C. truncatum, 10 days after inoculation.
Table 6. Effect of different products on lesions in <em>Carica papaya</em> var. Maradol fruits caused by <em>C. gloeosporioides</em>, 10 days after inoculation.
Table 6. Effect of different products on lesions in Carica papaya var. Maradol fruits caused by C. gloeosporioides, 10 days after inoculation.
Table 7. Effectiveness and severity in Carica papaya var. Maradol fruits of six fungicides seven days after inoculation with <em>C. truncatum</em> and <em>C. gloeosporioides</em> species.
Table 7. Effectiveness and severity in Carica papaya var. Maradol fruits of six fungicides seven days after inoculation with C. truncatum and C. gloeosporioides species.
Figure 1. Morphological characteristics of <em>Colletotrichum gloeosporioides</em> (1A) and <em>C. truncatum</em> (1B) isolated from papaya fruits.
Figure 1. Morphological characteristics of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides (1A) and C. truncatum (1B) isolated from papaya fruits.
Figure 2. Inhibition diameter after seven days of growth for <em>C. gloeosporioides</em> (A) and <em>C. truncatum</em> (B) with three doses and six fungicides using the disk diffusion technique. Evaluated doses: prochloraz, H = high 3 g L⁻¹; M = medium 2 g L⁻¹; L = low 1 g L⁻¹; benomyl, H = high 0.6 g L⁻¹; M = medium 0.4 g L⁻¹; L = low 0.3 g L⁻¹; azoxystrobin, H = high 0.3 g L⁻¹; M = medium 0.2 g L⁻¹; L = low 0.1 g L⁻¹; B. subtilis, H = high 4 g L⁻¹; M = medium 3 g L⁻¹; L = low 2 g L⁻¹; <em>Trichoderma</em> spp., H = high 1.5 g L⁻¹; M = medium 1.2 g L⁻¹; L = low 1 g L⁻¹; <em>B. cereus</em> 1.5 × 10⁸ CFU mL⁻¹. Means followed by the same letter within each species are not significantly different (Duncan, 0.05).
Figure 2. Inhibition diameter after seven days of growth for C. gloeosporioides (A) and C. truncatum (B) with three doses and six fungicides using the disk diffusion technique. Evaluated doses: prochloraz, H = high 3 g L⁻¹; M = medium 2 g L⁻¹; L = low 1 g L⁻¹; benomyl, H = high 0.6 g L⁻¹; M = medium 0.4 g L⁻¹; L = low 0.3 g L⁻¹; azoxystrobin, H = high 0.3 g L⁻¹; M = medium 0.2 g L⁻¹; L = low 0.1 g L⁻¹; B. subtilis, H = high 4 g L⁻¹; M = medium 3 g L⁻¹; L = low 2 g L⁻¹; Trichoderma spp., H = high 1.5 g L⁻¹; M = medium 1.2 g L⁻¹; L = low 1 g L⁻¹; B. cereus 1.5 × 10⁸ CFU mL⁻¹. Means followed by the same letter within each species are not significantly different (Duncan, 0.05).